It uses nothing more than how much power it takes to propel said weight to a said mph in 1320 ft. It really is that simple
The Ultimate Turbo Anti-lag System
- Thread starter Alky V6
- Start date
- Status
The joke here is you, you throw out these wild numbers with no back up 126 mph in the 1/8 at your weight is no where near 1180 hp. Dont try and pass your BS on us save it for your nitrous purging fans...
If the engine will flow it, no matter how many cylinders, then you can use the turbo. High flow heads would allow a small engine to use the flow of a relatively large turbo.
You and I both have the same understanding of turbos. Most turbos are max rated at the limits of their efficiency. For instance, if a turbo is advertised as being able to support 1500 hp, that will usually mean that the turbo will flow that at around 65% efficiency. You really don't want to run a turbo at less than 65% eff.
Now if you take that same 1500 hp turbo and run it at an airflow to support only 1200 hp, you should be smack dab in the middle of the eff island for that turbo. That would be running the turbo at 75-78% eff. That would give you lower compressed temps and a denser charge. I guess by the way you hate large turbos, you think it's better to run closer to 65% eff.
Shoot me a fax number and tomorrow I'll send a spec sheet for you to fill out. It will require detailed specs of the engine power curve and the chassis. If you can't fill it out completely, don't waste my time.
Ya heads make a difference, small heads need more boost at the rate your failing its going to take 70+ lbs to make the power you should. think ya still got 42 lbs left Ill give ya a hint NOOOOOOOOOOOO. Theres cars that have made the power your making with STOCK IRON BUICK HEADS ported with a 70 turbo think them heads flow better than yours, still want the congrats......
Tony. You're like the annoying side kick. Please, stop embarrassing yourself.BINGO!!!!!!!!! 181 cubes 4 cyl 1500 hp with a 88 does that tuner no anything about 224 cid motors
Then, it's simply wheel hp that does nothing to show how much hp is lost in the drivetrain.
These are specs Tony and his Engine builder would share,we would have to extend this to them.
Dont waste your time turbos rated at 1500 hp, i make 1478 hp by your numbers it would probably show 2000 hp seeing how your about 25% high on yours and we all now no thats BS....
Tony. Are you sure you're in the right section? I think you're looking for the political section.
Tony. Let me ask you something. If you talk to a chassis dyno operator and ask him how much hp is lost through the drivetrain using a high stall TC, what do you think the answer will be? Let me give you a real good clue. You've already answered it.
Stop being a fool.
You got the annoying part right, dont come on here with your BS and your lack luster performance and look for CONGRATS!!!!
Some of those ricers go pretty fast with those small engines, and large turbos. I think you gave a good example earlier. And you're right. The import crowd was forward thinking enough to use nitrous too.Nitrous,purging,blow off valves oversized turbos,doesnt spool for 200 ft, You sure that isnt a Honda your working on, Damn SO Cal ricers.....
So Otto. The Buick crowd never used nitrous before me?
Give me your fax number and I'll leave it up to you to come up with the specs. I'm sure you can get them from whomever.
You dont have a high stall its tight by your standards remember ??. I spool an 88 turbo on a pro tree think my converter is tighter than yours who is being the fool now!!!
You should first ask a chassis dyno operator what they consider to be a high stall torque converter before you take the chance of planting that large foot of yours so deeply down your throat. Jeez.
- Status
