Rafs-T-Type
Not so Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2009
It's our constitutional rights. Not much to review there.I think New Mexico needs to review there state laws.
It's our constitutional rights. Not much to review there.I think New Mexico needs to review there state laws.
Im not talking about Constitutional rights, Im talking NM's state law concerning handguns. What I gathered from the video is an officer doesnt have the legal right to question a persons "permission" to be carring an firearm.It's our constitutional rights. Not much to review there.
Power struggle? The police are supposed to be in control of the situation otherwise they are useless. This clown didnt put his had on the gun or he would have been drawn on or tazed if the officers had tazers.Mr.Spool said:wow that's a catch 22.wouldn't feel great having a stranger with a gun walk up on me if I was the cop,but I can see the op right to carry and not break any law.but common sense need to be used here and if there wasn't any I could have got ugly. all throughout that video you can see the balance of power struggle.
This dufus wasn't just walking down the street. He approached the officer while he was fully engagaed with a motorist. He got so close that the officer had to turn his attention away from the motorist and both address and direct the individual to back away. That's what happened in this video. Based on his stupididty alone, this interaction could have gone a lot differently for both the cop and dufus boy. Ever see a video of a cop shot while his own dash cam was rolling. The motorist can pose a threat as well as this dick every moment the officer has to engage either of them. This jackoff put the officer's safety at risk and I would have taken control of him until I was done...then he would have been free to leave...and if he didn't listen to me, he'd have lunch balogna sandwich style.First off let's look at the whole picture please.
1. Open carry is legal he is doing nothing wrong.
2. Cops "for the most part"are wrapped way too tight these days with criminals being let off so lightly and they having to face them repeatedly.
3. No ex-con/criminal is going to open carry.
4. Non-criminal, legal carry people have a .0001 rate of committing a crime with a gun.
5. If the cop was called to a disturbance and someone appeared with a gun that is a whole different scenario.
So with that information given if I was an officer who witnesses someone walking down the street with a gun I would not feel threatened. I would ask him his intention and nothing more. Depending on location and laws I would not push the boundary as many officers like to believing we don't deserve to breath their air.
Mikey
Jesus Christ they're multiplying! These retards are going to make laws change even faster. Unbelievable!
I wasn't even looking for anything related and still came across this.
D
So...if we continue to carry guns around they will make it so we can't carry guns around? So the only way to protect our right to carry guns would be to not carry guns?
It's our constitutional rights. Not much to review there.
Just my .02
But I think y'all are missing the big picture here. It's our constitutional rights is what I think the video is really all about. This is not Nazi Germany. We don't have to show our papers just because a cop says so. The cop are suppose to know the laws not just some of them. They are suppose to protect our all of our Constitutional rights not just some of them. It had nothing to do with the girl and everything to do with if the cops new the laws or not is what I got out of the video . I think it's more of an Educational video on our rights than it is watch me Harass a cop video.
Like I said just me .02
Shaun
the guy never walked up to the officer, he was clearly across the street, never interfered with the officer in the performance of his duties.
If my girl gets stopped and I have a opportunity to be there, I would . I would wait till the officer completes his duties and then find out from her what the ticket is for. my view of this is the officer did not like to be video taped, I am very sure the officer knows what the law is in his state, if he feels uncomfortable with people open carrying around him, I can understand that but he also has to realize that in his state that is totally legal. I give the guy credit for knowing his rights, and I give the cop credit for knowing when to just to let it go.
in my opinion the camera was what ticked the cop off, if he was worried about the firearm he would have stopped what he was doing
and addressed the bigger issue which is of course the firearm, he did not do that, he finished his ticket , got back in his car and followed
the guy and made a stop. I would have addressed the guy first, upon learning that this guy was the girls boyfriend.
I would have called for back-up , when another unit arrived , I would have advised him of the situation and told my back-up to just keep
an eye on him while I finished writing my citation. I CAN CLEARLY UNDERSTAND THE SAFETY ISSUE . I just don't think he liked
been video tapped. I feel video tapping keeps everyone honest, some cops are used to been video taped some are not. I can see both sides of the argument here, the bottom line is the guy knows his rights and did not break any laws. the officer has a right to be cautious, I would have. open carry or not. you always have to be more aware when someone who is not in law enforcement is carrying a firearm, you just don't know that persons intention, he might be a normal guy and that's great or he might be a guy who's about to loose it. its
that unknown factor that can make someone feel uncomfortable. good topic