Exactly what I was going to say! There is an ethics commission that oversees states attorneys.
That is complete bullchit Adam. Your not the type of person to bullchit anyone and you always show class so im sorry to see that you got taken like that.
I deal with those type of calls for a living. I am certified to teach landlord/Tenant law and am extremely familiar with it. Probably as much as any attorney. I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt that you got hosed!
Are you saying also that you have a written contract stating the deposit was non-refundable? If that is so I can tell you with 100% certainty the police are wrong and full of chit!
Anytime a citizen comes to the police for case like that we always refer them to the civil court. It's a contract between two citizens and any violation of that is a breach of contract, not law. A Tort is a whole different ball game and has no place in the police department.
Not to mention, if the police WERE going to entertain this incident they would have to contact you personally to conduct an investigation. That is police 101...
So in order to get an arrest warrant signed by a judge which first needs to be brought to a prosecutor they would have to describe in the affidavid what your version of events were and why and how they have now developed probable cause.
Even if it was not written, a verbal contract is still binding in a court of law and belongs in civil court either way.
Are you telling me that warrant is going to read that this person came to the PD and stated he gave you $1100 and you stole his money and never returned it?
It is simply not feasable that any arrest warrant would not indicate your version of events and how the police have now debunked it or refuted it and therefore now believe they have developed enough PC to apply for an arrest warrant.
They don't have that. Trust me.
I think the DC is bullchiten you and saying if you don't make restitution you are going to be arrested vs. I have this arrest warrant sitting on my desk. I'm still not sure how or why they would come to that conclusion if you had a written contract stating it was nonrefundable but whatever.
If there was a warrant already signed by a judge it would now have to be served. You don't get to pick and chose.
The DC can't just decide on his own that he is going to vacate a warrant from NCIC..... that is laughable! It doesn't work like that anywhere.
Charges like that would be felonious in nature and would have to be served by state statute. State statute mandates that you
SHALL arrest for felony charges. He never had chit on his desk. He had a note from ur buddy the prosecutor advising the DC to put some pressure on you. That's what he had on his desk probably....
I would seek out a good civil rights attorney immediately and seek your own restitution and much more. That case is a home run for any decent civil rights attorney.
They Police imo have stepped over their authority and intimidated you into paying up or getten arrested. When the police function outside the color of law they are now stepping on ones civil rights and subject to arrest themselves.
That's just my $.02 Adam. I would not be satisfied with how that ended. You were forced to pay for something that you did not have to pay for or face jail. FBI drools over cases like this where they can show a history between a prosecutor and a target like you. Very unethical.
Prosecutors think they are impervious to punishment because they are at the top of the food chain. Lol... They are human just like you.
Don't think because they are the Police that they know better either. Trust me, they need to be questioned more often then you think due to their incompetence. Especially down there I hate to say.