Where the hell are you guys seeing 40 thousand dollar STI's???
Sticker is 32k, and most ppl (including me) are getting them for just under 30K.
Is that still more than your 7k Gn? Obviously. Do you have a warranty? Nope. Does your car ride and drive just like a brand new car? Nope.
Could the 67 beetle I had 12 years ago, that I sunk 3500 bucks into have kicked the hell out of your 7k GN, I would bet my life on it. (it could also have kicked the isht out of 99% of STI's to be fair)
BTW to the original poster, I woudnt sweath your buddy's Legacy GT, even with a few bolt ons the legacy GT is a high 13 low 14 sec car if he drives it right. I am not a legacy guy so dont quote me on this, but I have yet to see a stock legacy anywhere near 13's.
Now a modded forester XT on the other hand.. I have seen quite a few 12 sec examples. But dont you guys run 12s with just a boost controller?? It shouldnt be much of a problem.
To what STI's run in the 1/4.
There have been a couple guys that have done 12.9 with them BONE STOCK, but thats REALLY rare and takes perfect conditions and driving. Most good drivers run 13.2. Bolt on a turboback exh, and run some sort of engine management and mid 12's are easily attainable, on the stock intercooler. I have seen 11's on the stock intercooler.
RE: trap speed
yes the AWD kills it. We run the times we run because of the incredible launch. Why do you think RWD 300chp cars dont run as fast? because of the traction. It works both for and against us. AT lower power levels AWD is a big advantage for the ET, but once you get to a certain level, RWD is the way to go, just too much loss through the AWD system
Not to call anyone out here, but dont put a theoretical 1/4 mile time in your signiture. That makes you no better than the honda douches. You claim 10's show me a slip. I have seen far to many "my car makes 500whp and is capable of 10's" running 14s to care.