I would be the first to promote the thought of being different and coming up with new ideas, that is the way I have always been (if I didnt think that way I wouldnt even be dealing with a hotair drivertrain when I have an '87 engine on the stand). However, the reason your hearing the "same thing" from "everyone" is that these cars have been around (roughly) 20 years now. I know and have heard of people who were tweaking and altering these cars when they were new, before there were any '86-'87 intercooled TRs (i.e. modifying and using an Edelbrock .231 intake). Im not implying that everything has been tried, but a whole lot of things have been, and so a lot of people here are speaking from experience or what theyve learned from others experiences who have traveled down the same road before.
I think a key question would be, how fast are you talking about going? Depending on the answer, alky, intercoolers, etc. may not even be an issue (yet). There are other issues with the hotair car (i.e. airflow restrictions) that can/should be addressed first.
If I wanted to just go with what is proven I would drive a mustang.
Hmm, "what is proven"? I think alot of the guys here already know from my past posts, but if you want, I can list the major problems that my engine had. They would definately show the potential of a hotair, as I was still able to spank the majority of the Mustangs (let alone the Camaros, TAs, etc) I faced at the track w/o alky.
Anyone can build a Mustang. It take something special to build a Turbo Regal
Im sorry but I dont think there is really a comparison, TRs were already something much more special to begin with