And btw
We have a car here with the same swing arm you say doesnt work going low 9s on a 64.
no he doesnt need the boost control and the turbo cannot be run all in on an hd actuator.
6466 Turbo Talk.
- Thread starter 434nova
- Start date
We have a car here with the same swing arm you say doesnt work going low 9s on a 64.
no he doesnt need the boost control and the turbo cannot be run all in on an hd actuator.
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2011
Was there a big spool difference between the 64 bb .63 and the 6771 .85 triplex bb on Dynoman's car from 0-32 psi?Yes very true
That was the thinking for sure and for good reason.
But.....
On multiple combos with the triple bb ctr wheels they spool so fast going to the bigger ar is the smarter way.
Spooling faster and getting the backpressure down can and needs to be done
Dynoman ran the same 64 bb turbo as you with a .63 ex housing.
We switched him to a 67/71 triple bb on an .85 pte and off the footbrake it spooled to 34psi in .5 sec from 1psi
I won tell you how much more power it made as well
Also at any rpm while cruising boost can be made or recovered while driving.
that's a 6mm increase on turbine wheel and 3mm increase on compressor wheel with a massive increase going to the .85 ex housing vs the .63.
That's what the newer turbos can be all about.
I've had the same result on with my stuff as well on even bigger turbos
This info is on buicks too not some import
Im aware the power increase was substantial
I beg you to go back and read his first comment in here. He simply said not true to what you said.
You are the one that went wayyyy off into the bushes. At this point I think he’s just having fun with you. It’s easy.
A lot of us have been on this board for a long time but rarely post. For reasons like this. You usually go on with these long, vague posts about these top secret cars.
Ps….I’ve never met Dave
Gosh that’s neat. Is it a real car that any of us would know of? Or one of the secret cars from the world of Spool?
In all fairness huh
do you understand n/t?
Or street racing?
Do you understand this is the internet?
I have given plenty of info that would be highly beneficial to those that go down this path.
I'm not going to tell you everything
It would be to long winded for you anyway
I race and those around me do in alot of different environments.
There is a part of me personally that thinks we wouldn't have an issue if we were all face to face.
There are plenty of things you cant read between each other on the internet.
My car has gone 9.4x with a 1.34 60’ with a 6466. Race weight is 3750.do you understand n/t?
Or street racing?
Do you understand this is the internet?
I have given plenty of info that would be highly beneficial to those that go down this path.
I'm not going to tell you everything
It would be to long winded for you anyway
I race and those around me do in alot of different environments.
There is a part of me personally that thinks we wouldn't have an issue if we were all face to face.
There are plenty of things you cant read between each other on the internet.
But nobody knows my car or any of my buddy’s cars that have all done similar feats.
I’ll say it again…a lot of us have been on this site for a long time. Longer than you.
We had a 6767 on there 1stWas there a big spool difference between the 64 bb .63 and the 6771 .85 triplex bb on Dynoman's car from 0-32 psi?
Im aware the power increase was substantial
Then changed the exhaust wheel to a 71
There was no loss in spool between them
There was also no loss in spool time vs the 64 as well
nice!My car has gone 9.4x with a 1.34 60’ with a 6466. Race weight is 3750.
But nobody knows my car or any of my buddy’s cars that have all done similar feats.
I’ll say it again…a lot of us have been on this site for a long time. Longer than you.
We too are in the dont advertise world
These are track times or street times?
That's getting it done at 3750.
From the 60ft all the way through.
But.....
You cant even come out to play here unless your running 8 sec and faster
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2009
Yes , it spooled way faster than the 64 . On a test ride I was going about 35-40mph , hit it pretty hard ,car went sideways and I got out of it . Inspecting the log afterwards , at 65% throttle the boost was at 32psi in less than .4 sec and the motor was making 920hp ...that's why it went sideways LOL . Night and day difference from the Tnetics 64 with .63 housing to the 6771 .85 housing . The boost definitely needs to be ramped in because it comes on like a supercharger .Was there a big spool difference between the 64 bb .63 and the 6771 .85 triplex bb on Dynoman's car from 0-32 psi?
Im aware the power increase was substantial
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2009
No , different motor built by Dave Husek for E85 , stroked , cam Dave had custom ground ,10-1compression , GN1 aluminum heads , SwainTec coated pistons , combustion chamber , exhaust ports , valve faces & exhaust stems . Dave spent a lot of time on the valve train geometry to get it perfect . The motor is very strong .
Car weighs 3780 lbs.
I need to update my signature , much has changed !!
Yes you do
Bad ass combination
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2009
I updated my signature .
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2011
Thanks for the Data, thats some good stuff
I remember when the Gt-q wheel was the greatest thing since sliced bread. man how far we've come.
you probably mentioned this elsewhere and i missed it, apologies in adv. Is the 0.85 AR housing on the Comp turbo a 3-bolt inlet and Buick compatible 4-bolt exhaust? GN1 DP with external waste gate?
- Joined
- May 25, 2001
Unless I am mistaken I think it is a PTE Buick .85 housing that is used for it?
