Thats funny. . .STi slower than stock turbo Buick. Next youll tell me that the GN's. . say the quickest year
87 . . not 86 with the chrome on the grill. . will also beat the AWD GMC Syclone right?
Read Motor Trend? just tested the 2006 STI . .so you know it ran a 13.0 flat. Fact. . STi has a better HP-weight ratio. . how do you like those apples???
Fact: Japanese cars outlast american cars. . due to better quality. So how did your non clear coat paint hold up. . over the years? Also the 3.8 turbo with the plastic timing chain teeth and inadequate oil pressure are good for 60-100,000 miles if your lucky. If the PCV didnt pressurize the pan and blow out the GM rope type rear main. On the other hand. . Japanese. . and unique boxer engine will run for 200,000 +miles. Subaru,Porsche and BMW motorcycles use the horizontally opposed design. . whats that tell you? Smaller package delivers more punch then 3.8V-6!. . lower center of gravity too. (thats right. . your car goes 1,320 ft in a perfectly level dry paved track)
My STi's AWD is standard. . .the limited slip diff was an option on the Turbo Buick. . code (G 80) I believe. . where you going with that? 1 wheel peel.. .245HP / 355 lbs going to A single 215/65 rear tire. Talk all you want about power this and that. . .power is nothing without traction. Im hooking up on 100% of the time.
ps Bryan. .read this shootout. . STi spanks 400HP RWD GM V8 :
Read this and weep