There's a lot of point. The owner is a street racer and doesn't want his info all over the internet. He would be happy to line up against other racers in the northeast though. The 64 and the 67 both use the same turbine. With the small ex housing there isn't any noticeable difference.
Fastest Passes with the Precision 6466 Post Here
- Thread starter blackgn1
- Start date
I understand what ur saying... I would have never actually made a post in the thread is all so I was wondering what your mentality was...... All your response did was raise more questions that u cant / dont want to speak on
If you posted a time/mph ( i.e. 9.8@136) w/ no further info, how would anyone know who's car it is or any info about the person/combo/etc?
Moving on....what do you think the 6466 can do on 231ci/250ci/S2 set up, taking into account the builds are appropriate for the 6466 turbo?
The car ran within a tenth of the quickest post I've seen here and was a vacuum launch and the car is fairly stock appearing and 3650lbs. Boost under 30psi. The car has to be built for it's intended purpose or it won't go. The 6466 will support 9.50 power in a full weight car.
I agree... The turbo has already performed at the same level VS the 67hpq and is no where near maxed out. My guess is the 6466 makes at least 75 horse more than the 70GTQ that I have... in TAI land amongst the quickest cars the 64 and 67 out perform my 70 as they are running at under 30psi what it takes me over 30psi to do..
The 70gtq has been high 140's in the quarter and I doubt the 6466 will run that fast. I ran 138.4mph@3600 lbs with the same exact turbo that's on your car and the boost was low 20's in 1st/2nd and 24 most of third with a couple frames hitting 25.1psi on 93/alky. With good fuel and 32-33psi/revised timing it will run 146-147mph. They all give up fast when they hit backpressure and that's the limitation of all the 3 bolt turbos when running the wastegate traditionally. If you're taking more boost to run the number with the same turbo then you need to look elsewhere for the hp. Switching turbos won't increase it. The engine is this particular car has very favorable valve timing events and is using a tang 4 bolt housing and an electronic boost controller.
9.50's if the backpressure is kept under control. Who defines what an appropriate build is?
20psiofevil
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2013
Subscribed.
Also if anyone wants me to post numbers on a 6466 I will but you're gonna have to loan me one first
Also if anyone wants me to post numbers on a 6466 I will but you're gonna have to loan me one first
Brian, You can post up my numbers anytime... (just not in the same class as previous posts) once you are done with the motor maybe you can drive the car down the track.. I am not sure my car will have enough to be worthy of this thread, but Brian you have my support to try...
Howling Mad
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2010
Because it "NEW"
It won't.... its rated less than the 67. May make different power depending on a specific combo
SCOOBY DOO
BASED CANADIAN PATRIOT!!
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2007
Would be a good step up for someone like myself from the 6262 which I currently beat on.
How far have u pushed the 62? Combo and boost??
SCOOBY DOO
BASED CANADIAN PATRIOT!!
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2007
6.90 at 101.58 at 28 PSI...with mostly bolt on junk. TT 5.7 chip....tuning with NB...flat tappet cam...stock rockers...stock bottom end...AC convertor...old skool alky and 94. Had the heads opened up last fall when I had the engine freshened up. Should be able to knock a few tenths off that this year.
forcefed3.8's
Buckeye Bullet
- Joined
- May 26, 2002
The 6766 has been 8.8s in TSM trim. You are splitting hairs between the 64 and the 67. Not much of a spool up difference. The 67 is my choice of turbo.
