Hey guys, I dyno'd the fiero the other day. heres the graphs tell me what you see the problem to be.
My cam is a hydraulic roller .512/.512 226/220 duration at .050", on 116 lobe separation 110 intake centerline. Ive been told my cam is mismatched to my combo. My engine is a series II 3800 that has been built up like a grand national V6, (somewhat). It has forged 8:1 pistons, forged rods, fully balanced. Garrett T66 turbo, .70 a/r T3 turbine (possibly too small and now a restriction?) Spearco water/air 2-230 intercooler. A guy mentioned a larger a/r turbine may yeild more upper rpm power, and adding a smaller cam (possibly going back to stock) would get the spool time back. Im thinking maybe a .440/.440 lift, 216/210 on 115 LC might work ok. What do you guys think? I know the technology for the series II's isnt really developed yet, but the turbo buicks of the 80's is still the grassroots foundation of our research. Thanks for any help.
My cam is a hydraulic roller .512/.512 226/220 duration at .050", on 116 lobe separation 110 intake centerline. Ive been told my cam is mismatched to my combo. My engine is a series II 3800 that has been built up like a grand national V6, (somewhat). It has forged 8:1 pistons, forged rods, fully balanced. Garrett T66 turbo, .70 a/r T3 turbine (possibly too small and now a restriction?) Spearco water/air 2-230 intercooler. A guy mentioned a larger a/r turbine may yeild more upper rpm power, and adding a smaller cam (possibly going back to stock) would get the spool time back. Im thinking maybe a .440/.440 lift, 216/210 on 115 LC might work ok. What do you guys think? I know the technology for the series II's isnt really developed yet, but the turbo buicks of the 80's is still the grassroots foundation of our research. Thanks for any help.