There is a very marked gain at 2.0". At 3.0" there is a dramatic drop. About 15 hp per cylinder at the peak values (6% power loss). From 3.0 to 4.0", another drop, but not as drastic. Above 4.0", with each additional inch there are more drops, but comparatively minor compared to the 2 through 4 inches range. I've looked at lengths to 7.0 inches. I really don't want to go any longer than that.When working with tunned runners, I would think that you would need to double or tripple the length to get you back to the same optimum fequency. 1 inch may start dropping power but there should be a point where it starts to pick up again ??
Allan G.
The pattern shows that with additional runner length the top end drops and the low to midrange gains. The teeter point is around 7,300 rpm. I only plan to be under 7,300 rpm for a split second during the launch, so I'm not really concerned with low to midrange torque.
If you study high rpm engines, you will notice that short runners are the order.
Blower intakes are the same way. Short runners. Blowers supply their own torque, so tuning in long runners to pump up the low to mid-range is not necessary.
In my case, nitrous will be used to pump up the low to midrange, and get the turbo spooling, so sacrificing top end performance with longer intake runners will not be necessary.