Falcon351C
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2003
Hey Guys,
I posted a while ago about how I was looking for a quad. I recieved many replies and the info was very helpful. Now im to the point where im going to buy one. Tuesday is the day it happens. And I still got one little problem. I've settled on artic cat...but I dont know if I should go with the 300 4x4 or the 400 4x4. I love the amazing ground clearance....and beefyness of the 400....but it's auto...and it is belt driven. And from the beginning I have said I wouldnt go with the belt drive. why I chose that? I dont know. I guess it would just always be in the back of my head that the belt could fail. So thats why I come here. I want the truth....cold hard facts. Will the belt driven automatic last as long...and be as tough and reliable as the standard clutchless manual design of the 300? I'd love to go with the bigger motor, power and stance of the 400...but not if it wont last as long as the 300. all the riding will be "normal" use. But I wont be afraid to point the thing in the biggest mud holes and narliest trails I can find out here in northern california. So what do you hardcore quad guys think? this is pretty much my deciding factor. I trust in the turbobuick community....dont let me down guys =)
just a side note...the artic cats run a suzuki drive train..and the trans on the auto is fully sealed and has a metal case...
I posted a while ago about how I was looking for a quad. I recieved many replies and the info was very helpful. Now im to the point where im going to buy one. Tuesday is the day it happens. And I still got one little problem. I've settled on artic cat...but I dont know if I should go with the 300 4x4 or the 400 4x4. I love the amazing ground clearance....and beefyness of the 400....but it's auto...and it is belt driven. And from the beginning I have said I wouldnt go with the belt drive. why I chose that? I dont know. I guess it would just always be in the back of my head that the belt could fail. So thats why I come here. I want the truth....cold hard facts. Will the belt driven automatic last as long...and be as tough and reliable as the standard clutchless manual design of the 300? I'd love to go with the bigger motor, power and stance of the 400...but not if it wont last as long as the 300. all the riding will be "normal" use. But I wont be afraid to point the thing in the biggest mud holes and narliest trails I can find out here in northern california. So what do you hardcore quad guys think? this is pretty much my deciding factor. I trust in the turbobuick community....dont let me down guys =)
just a side note...the artic cats run a suzuki drive train..and the trans on the auto is fully sealed and has a metal case...