With untouched heads around 460-470whp with 22* advance. Enough to run 11.0-11.10.I have pushed my Te62 to 29-30lbs a few times this summer and runs great. Specs are 935cfm's and 630 HP capable. Dont know what that equates to in my combo for HP, but it flies!!!
:biggrin:
There is little advantage to balancing a stock bottom end. It comes from GM balanced. Adding steel caps will not prevent the stock crank from flexing either. Lower engine speeds and lower cylinder pressures will minimize the flex.The last tear down of my engine was in the 90's and I was not aware of billet caps and girdles at that time.My engine was a stock teardown and rebuild that was balanced,rods beamed and the heavy D5 was later dumped for a precision 9.5.The shear and torsional forces applied to the crank are reduced.The engine balance will also reduce destructive vibration in the shortblock.Such changes will lengthen the life of stock shortblock along with the absence of detonation.
There is little advantage to balancing a stock bottom end. It comes from GM balanced. Adding steel caps will not prevent the stock crank from flexing either. Lower engine speeds and lower cylinder pressures will minimize the flex.
Those same dopes usually have a 12 sec or slower car that breaks every week. You're not pushing the stock parts to the limit either. If you were they would break. The funny thing is you often see people breaking better than stock parts making less power.I have over 300 passes on my stock engine, over half of which have been in the 11.0 range with a few 10.90s. With my weight I am right at 500 rwhp. Many people have told me that I am flirting with disaster by pushing the stock parts to the limit.