C cold85 Member Joined Jan 13, 2002 Nov 21, 2010 #21 i think it is to fast off because i looked at my xfi log and looks to be about 1.5 seconds before i hit 60 mph not .85
i think it is to fast off because i looked at my xfi log and looks to be about 1.5 seconds before i hit 60 mph not .85
G groumoutis Active Member Joined May 1, 2009 Nov 22, 2010 #23 My 92 Accord did a 0-60 in 3.5 minutes. Downhill with the wind at my back of course.
C cchilly Member Joined Mar 15, 2007 Nov 22, 2010 #24 I don't think its very accurate, or maybe it depends on your combination. I tried the old promod times and it came up with .44 seconds. It was actually like 1 second according to the racepak. Chris
I don't think its very accurate, or maybe it depends on your combination. I tried the old promod times and it came up with .44 seconds. It was actually like 1 second according to the racepak. Chris
B BlownV6 Well-Known Member Joined Mar 26, 2004 Nov 22, 2010 #25 My dragster has run a 4.23 1/8 mile at 163+ which calculates to .57 seconds. I can believe that!! Mike
My dragster has run a 4.23 1/8 mile at 163+ which calculates to .57 seconds. I can believe that!! Mike
Y YouLikeThat Member Joined Aug 24, 2004 Nov 22, 2010 #26 2.48 Jason Hoard's 87 Turbo T is .8 YouTube - jho 5 .08@ 151.5 MPH 275/60/15 Hossier DR
Y YouLikeThat Member Joined Aug 24, 2004 Nov 22, 2010 #27 cchilly said: I don't think its very accurate, or maybe it depends on your combination. I tried the old promod times and it came up with .44 seconds. It was actually like 1 second according to the racepak. Chris Click to expand... I found one a few years ago that factored in the 60' time also. I can't find it now.
cchilly said: I don't think its very accurate, or maybe it depends on your combination. I tried the old promod times and it came up with .44 seconds. It was actually like 1 second according to the racepak. Chris Click to expand... I found one a few years ago that factored in the 60' time also. I can't find it now.