robert duncan
Active Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2014
Guy on facebook just told me that the first three numbers on GM transmissions indicates how strong a transmission is. Like th350 to th400, so 700 is stronger than 200. Is that true? Seems chevy guys get all bent out of shape when you tell them that the 200 is a better transmission because all they know is chevy shit. I cited a quote by Lonnie Diers:
700 or 200?
"Honestly its not even a fair fight. The 2004R will handle power that far exceeds that of any 700R4 or 4L60 that can be built at any price. 2004R has a better gear ratio spread, better overdrive ratio, will fit many more applications, lighter, stronger ... I can go on and on. The 700R4 is best left to applications where its the only option such as 4WD or All WD, tow vehicles, Lower HP applications or for folks that are more concerned with budget versus strength and reliability." -- LONNIE DIERS
I'm not a transmission builder, but I believe it. Hell, what Buick guy would you ever talk to who said he put a 700 in a GN. I never heard of one. It's almost laughable. Any other thoughts out there?
700 or 200?
"Honestly its not even a fair fight. The 2004R will handle power that far exceeds that of any 700R4 or 4L60 that can be built at any price. 2004R has a better gear ratio spread, better overdrive ratio, will fit many more applications, lighter, stronger ... I can go on and on. The 700R4 is best left to applications where its the only option such as 4WD or All WD, tow vehicles, Lower HP applications or for folks that are more concerned with budget versus strength and reliability." -- LONNIE DIERS
I'm not a transmission builder, but I believe it. Hell, what Buick guy would you ever talk to who said he put a 700 in a GN. I never heard of one. It's almost laughable. Any other thoughts out there?