NHRA releases initial findings from Kalitta tragedy at Englishtown

IEATV8S

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
6/27/2008


While still conducting its investigation into the details of last week's tragic accident that took the life of driver Scott Kalitta, NHRA announced today some of its initial findings and subsequent steps being taken to continue its efforts to make the sport safer.

The loss of Scott Kalitta, a passionate champion driver and devoted family man, still weighs heavy on the hearts of everyone at NHRA, as we reflect on his many accomplishments and pass along our deepest condolences to his wife Kathy, his sons Corey and Colin, his father Connie, his cousin Doug, the entire Kalitta family and team, and all those he left behind.

It has been determined that a tragic series of events took place that fateful afternoon. An engine explosion near the end of the run resulted in separating most of the car's body from the chassis. The car's parachutes did not blossom, and the vehicle continued down the right side of the shut down area at a high rate of speed. It went off the top end of the track, up into the right catch net pole, and hit the television camera boom beyond the end of the sand trap before coming to a rest.

This sequence of events resulted in the passing of the two-time world champion and veteran second-generation driver.

The New Jersey State Police investigation team was on site the same day, working with NHRA officials as both conducted their investigation. Once it becomes available, NHRA will analyze the State Police report for any additional information on the incident. NHRA also continued its own investigation by bringing mechanical engineer and accident reconstruction expert David McCandless, M.S. M.E., P.E., to the site. McCandless is an independent engineer with more than 15 years of experience in reconstructing vehicular accidents. McCandless worked with NHRA officials, members of the Kalitta race team, and officers from the New Jersey State Police accident investigation team on site. McCandless examined and analyzed the vehicle, the track and other data, and his investigation is still underway. The Delphi technical team and Ford recovered and are analyzing the “Blue Box” data recorder data and NHRA is using this data and analysis in its investigation.

After its preliminary investigation, NHRA identified several areas to analyze and determine whether changes should be made to build upon the sport's long standing safety record, given the inherent risks and ever-present dangers associated with race cars traveling a quarter mile at more than 300 mph.

Technical Issues to be Investigated


Engine failure. NHRA, working with the Kalitta race team, has examined the engine, and will work with the Kalitta team and other teams to analyze what might be done to reduce such incidents in the future.


Parachute materials. Since the parachutes did not blossom, NHRA will work with parachute manufacturers and suppliers and SFI to analyze parachute mounting techniques and materials. Even though fire does not appear to have prevented the chutes from blossoming in this situation, NHRA also will work with manufacturers and suppliers to identify a parachute material that could be more fire resistant.


Brakes. Research will be conducted to explore whether there is a way to increase brake efficiency when cars lose downforce due to the loss of the body.


Shutdown Area. In light of this tragic incident, NHRA is looking into the shutdown area. NHRA has requested data from FIA regarding design and make-up of runoff areas in other forms of motorsports to see if it has any useful application to the unique forces in drag racing. Together with the racing community and outside groups, NHRA will research and analyze catch nets and restraint devices that are used in other applications, including military applications. In addition, NHRA will analyze additional methods that might be developed at the top end of the race track to help arrest runaway vehicles, given the speed, mass and other factors synonymous with NHRA drag racing.


Speed. NHRA has implemented many initiatives to enhance safety including measures to keep speeds from increasing, personal protective gear, vehicle improvements, and track enhancements such as sand traps, catch nets and concrete barriers the entire length of the drag strip. NHRA is considering whether current speeds should be further limited or reduced to potentially improve safety. To analyze this issue NHRA will develop a task force that also includes members of the racing community to evaluate how to reduce the speed of Top Fuel and Funny Car vehicles.

NHRA will continue to seek and welcome input from race teams on these and other issues in the coming weeks and months ahead. NHRA will release additional information from its ongoing investigation as it becomes available, as well as provide updates on the recently announced initiatives.
 
Very tragic event.:frown:

I don't agree with limiting speed in any racing event. That is the name of the game- go fast. Safety is surly top concern, I realize that. It is the evolution of the class- going faster and faster, so all aspects of safety need to evolve too. To make things safe let's limit the speed to 200?, 150?, maybe 100? Better yet let's just not race at all, limit racing to bench racing. Ofcourse that has its own dangers too.
 
Very tragic event.:frown:

I don't agree with limiting speed in any racing event. That is the name of the game- go fast. Safety is surly top concern, I realize that. It is the evolution of the class- going faster and faster, so all aspects of safety need to evolve too. To make things safe let's limit the speed to 200?, 150?, maybe 100? Better yet let's just not race at all, limit racing to bench racing. Of course that has its own dangers too.

X 2 !

Claude.:redface:
 
I didnt like how many racers were questioning the shut down and video tower after the tradgedy. Pedregon was going on and on about the shut down being to small. Well then dont race it wasnt an issue before the race. If you want longer shut downs then boycott the track totally.
 
I agree, skip the 20-20 hindsight and don't race if you think it's not safe to. That's what top fuel driver Alan Bradshaw did before the tragedy. It was ironic he was interviewed on TV during the earlier qualifying runs and said he left his team because they were not doing everything they could re: safety and then later there was the tragedy.

Here's an idea... why don't they get rid of those stupid generic bubble bodies they use and make the bodies look more like real cars... like the funny cars of the 60's. They could modify anything and have as much nitro and HP as they could muster, but the cars would have to look more like indentifyable real cars instead of that phony body used now. The cars would be more fun to watch and have less top end MPH so they might be safer on older tracks even though they still would be racing all out.

Paul
 
I have an idea how about having a sensor at the finish line pop your chute regardless of speed. Every pass a chute must open whether the driver pulls or not.
 
There is a military device that could possibly be used in some way here.
There is a "net" used to stop questionable approaching vehicles to checkpoints overseas.
The way it works, it is deployed in a similar manner to spike strips, although this consists of a metal mesh net. The net actually will be grabbed by the tires and wrapped around both front and possibly rear axles. The car will no longer roll, and instead is brought to a halt by the friction of the netting material against the road surface.

I can't remember where exactly I saw this.

Also, on the subject of the chutes, I could see having remote control over them in case of emergency. Similar to how monster trucks have remote activated "kill-boxes" installed. They are activated by someone other than the driver, so if something happens to the driver, someone else can shut down the vehicle.
 
I would make the device mandatory today. The only time they dont pull the chute on a funny car or dragster is an aborted pass during qualifing. This is only done to save time on the turnaround.

Every car that crosses the line has a chute open period. To me there is no down side.
 
I have to agree with the racers on this one.

Kalitta never got the car slowed down when he hit the sand trap. The chutes did not deploy and from what I could see he never got a hand on the brake either.

The only way you are going to slow a car down doing 300 plus mph is a longer shut off area. The length of the shut off is not consistent among all the tracks. Vegas has a quarter mile shut off and it is uphill.

With the explosions going on like they are in funny car, maybe explosive bolts on the body would be interesting. Once the body is off the drivers can at least see and breathe well enough to steer and get the car slowed down some.
 
After 1 of Force's many fires/explosions, he had a body ejection device. Don't remember seeing it approved by Wally and crowd.
As for speed.. Doubt there are many folks in the crowd that can tell 290 mph, from 320.
Safety is "on the edge" when you are pulling 12HP/ci, using ungodly boost, and an unstable compound for fuel.[The 45 min turn around limit doesn't help w/ accuracy in the pit operations, either.]
Goodyear has been expressing concern w/ the ability of current tire technology, to safely run 330mph.
It all adds up...."Mess w/ the bull long enough, and you'll get the horn"...
 
I believe he was unconcious after the motor blew at the stripe. The brakes were never appiled, but another factor as to why the car was still traveling so fast on impact was the heads were blown off enough that there was no compression which resulted in no engine breaking slowing the car down. You could hear the car free wheeling as it went by.
 
Here's an idea... why don't they get rid of those stupid generic bubble bodies they use and make the bodies look more like real cars... like the funny cars of the 60's. They could modify anything and have as much nitro and HP as they could muster, but the cars would have to look more like indentifyable real cars instead of that phony body used now. The cars would be more fun to watch and have less top end MPH so they might be safer on older tracks even though they still would be racing all out.

I believe that class is called ProMod. A four letter word as far as the NHRA is concerned. To go back to cars that look like showroom cars is a bad idea. The current FC body is an aerodynamic device. A one piece wing sort off. That's why when it blows off the cars wreck. That's why these short wheel base cars go fast. IMO the class is just fine as it is. If you want stock than you have ProStock. If you want nitro than you have ProMod. Aint nothing can help an unconscience driver except to help stay conscience in the first place. And I dont think remote devices are the key either. I bet when all is said and done nothing will have changed. Englishtown will still have a short shut down area. Hmm. Just like diapers,hold down straps,blow off shields,45 minute teardowns,etc I bet something comes down the pike on penalizing teams and crew chiefs if thier motors grenade from now on. And that will probably mean lots of rules on how you can build a motor in the Fuel Classes in the future. You know it's going to happen. NHRA is just like NASCAR. It's all about entertainment. Not racing as us little guys know it.
 
Good for them. This is a good start. 1/8 mile is something to look at. Some of these cars will still run 290-300 @ 1000 ft. Still to fast for most tracks.
 
Safety nets would be easy. It's the track length that becomes the issue. Im sure they could configure some sort of mechanism that is retractable when not needed.
 
Point is, that if a track doesnt have a safe enough shut down area, like most of our NHRA tracks ( sand and all), they need to be modified, until up to speed. He flat out would not have died if he had the right amount of shut down and sand, parachute or no parachute!
 
Top