corsair231
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2005
and here's why... (NSFW- some language)
It's amazing how the interviewer states Clinton's discretion was in the past and no longer relevant while Trump's conversation 8 years prior is not in the past but is the future and very relevant. Besides the fact that Clinton's apples are not equal to Trump's oranges, I think the truth is that Clinton abused the power of the office making his apples a whole lot more rotten than Trump's private conversation oranges.
It's amazing how the interviewer states Clinton's discretion was in the past and no longer relevant while Trump's conversation 8 years prior is not in the past but is the future and very relevant. Besides the fact that Clinton's apples are not equal to Trump's oranges, I think the truth is that Clinton abused the power of the office making his apples a whole lot more rotten than Trump's private conversation oranges.