MeanBuicks
Scaring the neighbors!
- Joined
- May 24, 2001
You couldn't be more wrong. The adjuster is there to settle the claim at a fair amount. Any offer that an insurance company makes is based on something. A total loss offer is usually based on a few dozen similiar vehicle sales in the local region. It's illegal for an insurance company or their employees to say "This car may be worth $10k, but I'm just going to offer $5k to try and save the company some money". Usually the issues with classic cars are because there are not many sales to compare your vehicle to. And like someone mentioned above, the adjuster doesn't understand the value of a particular vehicle like a n/a Regal vs. a GN.
An insurance company has no benefit to drag out a claim. Few insurance companies make money from the premium they collect. They make money by investing. The more claims they have open means that they have to keep more money stored in reserve to pay for open claims. This means they have less money to invest. There is constant pressure on adjusters to close claims. A common phase in the industry is that "a closed claim is a good claim", even if you had to overpay to get rid of the claim.
Dude...you obviously never had to deal with Nationwide over a stolen GN because everything you just stated is EXACTLY the way they dealt with my claim. They stalled, low balled, hired a crooked third party appraiser and even practically accused me of arranging the theft. F***heads!