The non-TR commercial stuff from Carrol, Aquamist, etc, seems to be water oriented. They claim that alky only adds less 5% effectiveness and not worth the cost unless needed to prevent freezing.
There does seem to be some anecdotal evidence that up to 50% methanol will make a significant improvement. Since the aforementioned systems are not methanol freindly, they may well ignore that, or feel that the benefits do not justify the addittional cost to make them methanol freindly. Other forms of alky are less destructive and work to prevent freezing, but do not have the properties to add significantly to overall effectiveness.
Also, in a TR that has maxed out the MAF there needs to be a way to adjust fueling to compensate for the added boost. Alky is fuel so varying the mix is another tuning tool, especially when still using a non-alky chip or an alky chip that just has extra timing but not water optimized fuel tables.
All of this is just from my research. One of these days I am going to do some track testing but I really want a progressive alky controller that tracks injector pulse width and boost in order to maintain a user selectable water/gas ratio and drive the ShureFlow pump.
HTH,
Tom