- Joined
- May 27, 2001
Brian,
That is interesting information, since PTE does not do compressor maps you will not really know where the turbo needs to be to flow the air.
I have the .63 on my 6265 RS, I just have to get it on before I can give you
any feed back. My school of thought with getting the .63 is my motor with the stock cam and lower rpm range would make more power under the curve with the smaller turbine housing.
That is interesting information, since PTE does not do compressor maps you will not really know where the turbo needs to be to flow the air.
I have the .63 on my 6265 RS, I just have to get it on before I can give you
any feed back. My school of thought with getting the .63 is my motor with the stock cam and lower rpm range would make more power under the curve with the smaller turbine housing.
Well, I found through testing earlier in the year, the car was about 1mph faster in the 1/4 with the old TE-63-1 turbo I have. So, now with the new converter I would like to see if this still holds true.:wink:
The 6265 has a 85 PTE exhaust housing and the 63 has a 63 PTE housing. I thought I would see more top end out of the 6265 than I have. Is it possible that the 85 is to much for my mild combo? And, would I have been better off to go with a 63ex on the 6265? That is a little bit of what I am after here. I know it is not an accurate comparison, but, I want to check it out for curiousity. Since it is basically a "free" mod at this point.
Brian