Ian, we had 7 cars to choose from with the three plates that were purchased.
Therefore, none had more than one plate and none ended up in the trunk.
Strike, you are absolutely correct. Many thought the earth was flat but someone came up with a power plate and proved them wrong.
The results are quite simple with regard to the Plate.
It has been installed and compared to plate/no plate in back to back runs and shown to improve performance numerous times over in front of independent onlookers including Nick's test on the GSCA car at the Nats....Lot's of people standing around watching the installation and runs on that one. Plate is a bit thin to hide nitrous in, I think.
It has been dyno'd by at least three different groups of people and proven to improve performance.
It is used by some of the fastest stock block cars in the country and shown to improve consistency and speed. It is very important to note that
Stock Block/Stock Intake is the key here. It does not matter what happens on a low nine second stage car, etc. How many people run the times of the TSM top guys consistently and go home with head gaskets and blocks intact? Not too many, or TSM would be a lot more crowded.
Those that look at it and say it cannot work are ignoring reality and are in the flat earth category.
The fact that it works has been proven multiple times. The only argument that may remain is why/how it works.
Jason has published his tests and his theories. Dynos, flow measurements, and real world results have substantiated his claims.
Those that claimed that boost improvements (more can be run) is due to restriction in the plate have been disproven as noted in one of the prior posts in this thread where pressure was measured above and below the plate.
Jason spent a long time perfecting the idea and made much more definitive measurements that simply sticking his hand under a "weedeater
"
Those, that have the ability to look at such a complex matter as airflow thru a tb, plenum, intake, and heads and say it does not work, Should be able to quickly prove their point.
I fail to understand why Jason has to prove anything further about his product in the face of demonstrated success by independent individuals who use the product, not sell it.
Perhaps the person that can prove that it does not redirect air flow as advertised will also demonstrate why it
really works? Until then, it is just eyeball engineering to claim it cannot work. Wait, I don't want to insult any real engineers so let's call it eyeball pseudo-engineering.
I await definitive disproof.