HellOnWheels said:
Well good!!
I read his post as asking for octane ratings!!
He asked a two part question, the first part was what octane is 91 proof alcohol.
The second part was asking what produces the most power, alcohol or methanol. That is like asking what is stronger, wood or mahogany. So I made the clarification that methanol is an alcohol and that there are several types of alcohol perhaps helping him to be more specific in his question.
The question is still kind of vague even if we assume that "alcohol" refers to ethanol in his question. There are alot of factors involved in how much power is made with which alcohol. In the strictest sense, there is more power to be had from ethanol since it has more energy content pound per pound.
Since we are using it as a supplementary fuel and cooling agent, in actual practice, methanol seems to be more effective since you can use alot of it (low stoich afr throws off your mixture little) which compounds the benefits of its high latent heat properties. If you used isopropyl (for an extreme example) in the same quanitity you would have to greatly reduce the amount of gasoline in the chamber. This is removing a fuel from the chamber (gasoline) with higher energy content than alcohol that would also be absorbing heat from the chamber as it changes state.
Since methanol carries its own oxygen, it doesnt force you to reduce the amount of gasoline in the chamber to the same degree. So you've added alcohol to the chamber, an agent with a high latent heat in addition to close to the same amount of gasoline you allready had. The total energy content balances out to be probably greater than the isopropyl/gasoline mix, and, probably greater latent heat since you have more gasoline and alcohol alltogether. Despite the fact that isopropyl has much more energy content per gallon, the greater cooling effects of the gasoline/methanol and probably neglible difference between total energy allow methanol to win the day.
There is probably a long equation to tell you definitively how much more energy a specific lambda of a fixed amount of different types of alcohol mixed with a variable amount of gasoline
You don't need an equation to know that the richer the input afr is required for a given alcohol, the greater amount of heat it will absorb in the chamber for a fixed amount of alcohol and variable amount of gasoline to maintain the same lambda. In this case, methanol clearly wins hands down. That is making no mention of the fact that it has a much higher latent heat. Its a double whammy.
Ethanol is somewhat inbetween iso and meth in its energy content and latent heat and stoich AFR. It seems to me that there is a correlation between energy content the three. From what I have observed, it would seem to me that what is eliminating the knock in the chamber the most is the latent heat property of the fuel. Boost makes for more power and if you are knocking you cant run more boost. For a given amount of methanol you will absorb more heat than ethanol, and be able to run more gasoline which also absorbs heat. The result is alot more heat pulled from the chamber than ethanol and probably a neglible energy difference (If there are any chemists here that can work out the energy difference I would love to see that)
I am no chemist and am just going off of what I have observed in testing and from my own research online, Im sure I've goofed in how I've explained it somehow but that is what makes sense to me. If there are any chemists out there please chime in.
Proof refers to how much alcohol is in a beverage, the proof number is twice the percentage of the alcohol content measured by volume at a temperature of 60 °F (15.5 °C). So 91 proof means that whatever beverage he is thinking of using is only 45.5% ethanol, the rest is water. So if you want to accomplish the same thing as 91 proof alcohol, you can just get ethanol and mix it to where it is 45.5% alcohol and the rest water. Since alcohol is not flammable under 50% I would guess that the octane rating would either be infinite or pretty darn high.