HEMI T04 said:
Bruce with you experience with Methanol injection with and without intercoolers. Whats is your opinion on intercoolers and methanol injection, if you are using a high % alcohol ,say 50% and above of the total fuel flow. Are intercoolers actualy required/beneficial when you are using this much alcohol/cooling/anti detonation. As the indy cars had amazing turbo power outputs with 100% methanol and no intercoolers. In other words will the intercooler give you more power if you had 100% methanol injection into each cylinder, as the restriction on the turbo system and weight of the cooler/plumbing have to be included also.
There comes a point when you run *enough* alky/ fuel, for in cylinder cooling that you start running out of air. You can pack in all the fuel (methanol, gasoline, nitro, nitrous), you want, but the problem becomes having enough O2 to make max HP.
The first order of business, IMO, is getting the air charge as cool as possible. Then packing all the fuel you can burn into the chamber, and balancing that with whatever in-cylinder cooling additives, you're allowed, and tuning that for max HP.
So, what I've wound up doing, is running the biggest, most effective Intercooler that I could find (ie a Cotton's), and running the best designed Alky Kit I could find, ie Razor's.
FWIW, as I recall the Indy rules didn't allow for Intercooling, so no one experimented much with them. If the rules had allowed them, I'd imagine then all the cars would have had them.
If I was racing in a class, where I could run gas or alky, I'd run alky. If I had the choice of gasoline, with an intercooler, OR alky without an intercooler, I'd have to spend alot of time, figuring out what that application would benefit most from having.