Lets see now...... in attached link i have pic of what i think is the bar to the rev kit?
http://www.t6p.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3729
http://www.t6p.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3729
Originally posted by Swede2
Good luck Uffe and you have to change your profile
I am looking forward to see your car in action sometime... but this will take some years right ?
Daniel
Originally posted by Mac in SD
Uffe, the 153 block is "on-center" while the stock block and early stage blocks were "off-center." What this means is that the cylinders were shifted .120 each way to center the crank throws on the cylinder bores. The cam and crank are the same in either on- or off-center, but the front face of the block is .120 further out than a stock or early stage block. That means that if you use a stock front cover, the cam sensor gear, as well as the water pump pulley, will be .120 out of alignment. Some builders say the easy fix is to shim the crankshaft timing chain gear out .120, and then everything will line up, which is true as far as the Cam nose sprocket and crank sprocket, and the water pump and main accessories. BUT, the cam sensor gear will be riding out on the edge of the cam drive gear, in other words it won't be centered. There have been reports of rapid cam gear wear in on-center blocks, and I think it's because of this misalignment. So, in my opinion, it's better to remove .120 from the gasket face of the front cover, then also the main accessory bracket in order to line things up. Even Buick said that front covers needed to be shortened when using the on-center block. Again, that's just my opinion.
Originally posted by The Swede
Any one having the typical flow numbers on full ported Stage2 heads?
Thanks!
EightSecV6 said:You can count the number of cars tha thave run faster than 7.50 with a Buick V6 on 3 fingers (of course I am sure that number will be corrected by the experts )
EightSecV6 said:FM is Federal Mogul, I stock them in all sizes but I would think you should be able to get them local somewhere?????
EightSecV6 said:You can count the number of cars tha thave run faster than 7.50 with a Buick V6 on 3 fingers (of course I am sure that number will be corrected by the experts )
The Swede said:Hey John!
Hopefully we will count in the crazy Swedes soon in the low 7's club.
Thank you all for your support to help us to build a really fast StageII over here in Sweden!
John Wilde said:With the more aerodynamic body and the meth I would think that you would have no problem. In fact I would go out on a limb and say you could hit a 6 depending on what your race weight is.
John Wilde said:Ask and you shall receive.
There are 4.
In Chronological Order =)
-Buddy Ingersol
-Ken Duttweiler
-Bill Anderson
-Big Al
There are a couple more that are close but no cigar!
-Bob Borelli
-Shawn Lilly
-Gary Lee