4.11 gears
my best with the 342 gear was 11.82@114.87mph on a 1.67 60ft on the bfg drag radial.swapping to the 411 gear, car went 11.64@114mph with a 1.64 60ft,so they grew on me
sometimes i use it sometimes i dont,car ended up going into the 10s without it,but it needed that 30psi to do it.imagine if it was lightI appreciate that. Thank you. Makes a lot of sense when your using nitrous. Seemed to have forgotten that in the other thread...
It's never everything I race alot now and was running 2 cars at one point.the threads i threw out there is only what I was willing to share at the time.i had run 10s/11s on a 49 on race gas on the same combo before I was even on the board and the car was lighter and on slicks. then wanted to be purely street and do it on pump gas alky,with a stereo ac heat no lightweight wheels or slicks and skinnies but through a full exhaust not making any sounds and no fiberglass parts,which at the time Julio's alky kit wasn't even around,had to make my own.it was more of a quest and how I wanted to run the car, we were all driving alot to shows too back then and 10s and 11s was really fast back then for a street car.Out of curiosity, when did you run those numbers? Both your threads are here at the top of this section. In 2008 everything is in this thread, in 2010 you retired that old combo and put in the RPE built 109 and never looked back.
I one car,the other had a stock motor 49 at 32psi single nozzle on drag radials and it was lighter and ran high 11s on a stock turbo before the 49.the rpe motor is in my nt car with a whole new combo and its purpose is to go fast for as long as it can lolput in the RPE built 109 and never looked back.
What dont you understand?thought I explained above,those threads talk about boost numbers and 10s and low 11s on a 49 turbo some of which my car at the higher weight maybe that's why your confused.my car never was stuck at 1.58 60ft,it used to do that off a 1lb leave on the converter, right off the foot brake, the 1.52 60ft was on a rpe motor that's when I was breaking it in at low boost and low timing on pump gas and meth I was shocked that it ran damn near the other combo not even trying.you seem to be pulling and picking and trying to move timeframes about posts.ive posted plenty of data regarding 49 turbos and nearly stock motors.keep saying this but they need to be squeezed at higher weight and must 60ft and 330 to run a number.at lower weight difference story,I've had 2 cars at 2 different weights show the same thing as well as my few of my friends cars show nearly identical results.It's your story, I'm just curious how far your willing to go with it. In 2012 this was you....
and in 2014 this was you.....
Your sixty foot has always been 1.58 from 2008 to 2014 when you mentioned the TA49 turbo and your best sixty foot in that time frame was a 1.52 with your RPE motor that you mentioned for 4 years as being your best. When something sounds too good to be true, it usually is. In no way am I doctoring, fabricating or maliciously putting words in your mouth. This is all you.