Thought this is SUPER COOL wanted to know everyone's thoughts

[t3intercooled]

http://www.ebay.com/itm/391296195285?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT

 

[stricken6]

a specific VIN designating it as an "experimental" car, and no Title.

does that make it a garage ornament?

 

[t3intercooled]

Thats what Im wondering. Would it be like a kit car titling wise?

 

[Chuck Leeper]

IMO, it makes it a BS ad..
AIRC, GM DOES NOT sell prototype vehicles.

 

[t3intercooled]

IMO, it makes it a BS ad..
AIRC, GM DOES NOT sell prototype vehicles.

So, I contacted GM and they responded:

Generally, we do not sell our prototypes/concept vehicles. However, occasionally one of these vehicles may be available to select entities with the intent that the vehicle cannot be driven on public roads/highways, titled or have warranty coverage, etc. Unfortunately, we do not have information on which entities have access to these vehicles.

 

[El Corvino]

GM emptied out there museum a few years ago for extra cash flow. I remember because I wanted to buy the 1996 Impala SS station wagon. "intent that the vehicle cannot be driven on public roads/highways"... BS, while Cali and other states are strict, everyone knows you can take what ever has tires and rolls to Florida and register it at a kit car. So yes, more than likely it is a legit GM build that some executive's friend or family member got for nothing and is trying to sell for a few $$$.

 

[turbo39151]

I like it! It's the right color and everything. (I'd prefer a turbo but S.C. is fine too)