Rule changes

Kip

Well-Known Member
As already brought up by Otto, losing the “ no aftermarket automated shift actuation” rule.
 

Tweeked6

Tsm RRA
Staff member
What would TSM gain by changing this rule? What would TSM lose by changing this rule? Let’s discuss
 

sackracing

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Mini Tubs are not an advantage with a tire size limit
Coilovers are not an advantage you can put a coilover spring on top of the rearend
 

Tweeked6

Tsm RRA
Staff member
I disagree with the mini tub. You can get the car lower. That is an advantage. We can talk about coilovers but I do not want to see vertical coil overs. I have asked to see pictures of what people would want to run but nobody sent me anything. I would intertain voting on stock location coil overs only.
 

Tweeked6

Tsm RRA
Staff member
If we take a vote on shifter stuff, we need to take a vote on traction control too.
I also see we need for a vote on allowing M1 fuel.
I would like to loosen up the weight a little on 109 block cars I think possibly although John Plog is really doing well!!!
 

sackracing

Well-Known Member
Staff member
I can’t see the relation to traction control. The rule was put in when Dick Kereny was going fast and using one. It wasn’t traction control related.
 

sackracing

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Keep in mind there are only a few Rules that really affect the speed of the class

Stock suspension
Weight
Cylinder heads
Turbo size
Tire size
Fuel

Everything else is just stuff that makes car count suffer
 
Top