MFS 6265 turbo results 9.96@135.73 ***updated 9/19/2014***

That Turbo works real good on that combo.picking up that kind of power with those numbers isn't easy.the spool time must be close to 62/65 to get peak power increase and get it in all in under 5600rpm.
 
Mr.Spool said:
That Turbo works real good on that combo.picking up that kind of power with those numbers isn't easy.the spool time must be close to 62/65 to get peak power increase and get it in all in under 5600rpm.
Click to expand...
It didn't stop at 5600. It picked up all the way to 6000 where I stopped the test. It spends a lot of time between 5100 and 5500 the way it is now


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
bison said:
The it didn't stop at 5600. It picked up all the way to 6000. It spends a lot of time between 5100 and 5500 the way it is now
Click to expand...
I was going to ask;)but I didn't know how much info you wanted out in this thread.
 
Is that stock cam / valvetrain? If your OK with sharing info....

Edit...just reread the first post....its been awhile
 
Last edited:
nice! guess the stock crank, rods and pistons can go pretty far with a good tune.... cause lord knows u beat the balls off that thing. thats like a 6 hr round trip smh thats awesome. the 60 has a lot left in it to.

bison said:
In the 9's. 93/alky, MFS 6265. Stock block, crank, rods, pistons, rings.
50ccea4e060be27960854c031c526dfd.jpg



BPE2013@hotmail.com
Click to expand...
 
REAPER231 said:
Badass bison , a nice pair of flowing heads don't hurt either :)
Click to expand...
This is true but when you're out of turbo it won't matter what heads you run. You have to look at the mechanical aspect of the engine. Compression ratio and cam timing. The engine has to become more efficient with the external parts. An 8.3:1 stock shortblock isn't going to work with high drive pressure


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I'm a little confused. I kinda thought you were a cop, but it seams clear you are a scientist of sorts. Thanks for your testing and knowledge!
 
bison said:
This is true but when you're out of turbo it won't matter what heads you run. You have to look at the mechanical aspect of the engine. Compression ratio and cam timing. The engine has to become more efficient with the external parts. An 8.3:1 stock shortblock isn't going to work with high drive pressure


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Badass ! Great build
 
After being away from this community (on a consistent basis) for 10 years I see this post and still amazed at what people are doing with these cars. Pretty damn amazing Bison!
 
GNVAIR said:
After being away from this community (on a consistent basis) for 10 years I see this post and still amazed at what people are doing with these cars. Pretty damn amazing Bison!
Click to expand...
Thank you. There's even more potential than this with these parts. This is by no means the limit. Plenty of room for improvement. Better 60', better air, higher CR, external wastegate. Lots could be done to shave a couple more tenths off


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
1987 Buick Regal Turbo T
Replies
6
Views
1K
mapmaker
M
T
Amazing 1986 Grand National
Replies
4
Views
2K
Tom Kelly
T
GNVYUS 1
Garrett G30-770 Turbo vs TA49, 1990s vs 2020s, GN Mustang DYNO Results Inside!!
2 3
Replies
43
Views
9K
GNVYUS 1
GNVYUS 1
T
Buick is in the family DNA
Replies
6
Views
824
Chuck Leeper
Chuck Leeper
WE4TP
FOR SALE: 1987 Buick Turbo-T WE4/WO2 $60,000 Package Deal
Replies
0
Views
2K
WE4TP
WE4TP
Top