Facts about Gun Control!!

"To each his own"...:rolleyes:

Claude.

Ahhh, Claude. :rolleyes:

there's the bitch of it all. your 'gun control' doesn't allow to each his own. it allows your 'wait for the cops' mentality but it makes my 'shoot back' mentality illegal. i agree to each his own 110%!!! but you people who actually think guns kill people are trying to outlaw my rights, and that is called tyranny. if you honestly believed it should be to each his own, then you'd be all for abolishing the joke that is 'gun control', because that would allow me to do 'my own' thing without being a felon and you to continue to be an unarmed subject.
 
Ahhh, Claude. :rolleyes:

there's the bitch of it all. your 'gun control' doesn't allow to each his own. it allows your 'wait for the cops' mentality but it makes my 'shoot back' mentality illegal. i agree to each his own 110%!!! but you people who actually think guns kill people are trying to outlaw my rights, and that is called tyranny. if you honestly believed it should be to each his own, then you'd be all for abolishing the joke that is 'gun control', because that would allow me to do 'my own' thing without being a felon and you to continue to be an unarmed subject.

Well there it is, liberals want everyone to have their rights as prescribed in the constitution, problem is they want to leave out the parts they don't like.
 
Ahhh, Claude. :rolleyes:

there's the bitch of it all. your 'gun control' doesn't allow to each his own. it allows your 'wait for the cops' mentality but it makes my 'shoot back' mentality illegal. i agree to each his own 110%!!! but you people who actually think guns kill people are trying to outlaw my rights, and that is called tyranny. if you honestly believed it should be to each his own, then you'd be all for abolishing the joke that is 'gun control', because that would allow me to do 'my own' thing without being a felon and you to continue to be an unarmed subject.

Well, it's YOUR way of looking at it and it's all right...It's not a question of who's right or wrong here...just that you and I have different opinions, nothing more (to me at least...). Everybody can't always agree...and that's what I meant when I said "to each his own" ;)
'bye!

Claude. :)
 
Murder did not begin with the gun and won't end if you eliminate it.

Legislation only affects those that abide by laws. The majority of crimes committed with guns are committed with weapons illegally owned to begin with. If we cannot enforce current legislation on criminals, how can one realistically expect that further legislation will have any impact?

Places with the highest percentages of gun ownership in the USA are not coincidentally the safest places to live. For those of you that doubt this, travel to middle America where everyone has a gun and violent crime is almost unheard of.

Contrast this with places with very strict gun control measures like Chicago or Washington D.C. and you see some of the highest murder rates in the country. For awhile, you would have been more likely to die of a gunshot wound in D.C. than from a gunshot wound as a US service member in Iraq. This is in a city that only up till recently effectively had an outright gun ban.

Regardless of any crime stats, you should study the intent of the founding fathers.
An armed citizenry is an important weapon against tyranny or mob rule. It's been proven time and time again throughout history. Unarmed citizens are easy to control.
You may think tyranny in the US is a far fetched notion but that is only because you are not a student of history.
Governments and nations are challenged, some rise, and all have inevitably fallen with some to have risen again. The one common theme is that armed (firearms or other) violence was always a factor either by action or by threat.

To believe that this trend has ceased on this planet is to believe in fairy tales of world peace and utopia.

If you wish to let someone else bear the burden of your protection, or risk your life and well being because of a utopian view of the world, don't let me stop you.
Likewise, don't impose your fairytale ideas of the world on me.
 
Studies have been done that show owning a gun can reduce the threat of crime greatly. A study that mandated every home own a gun showed huge decreases in home burglaries. Areas where rape was very prevalent showed a major decrease when the Police started training women to use guns.
Ownership of firearms is a deterrent.
Saying this I also know a better job can be done controlling the where about's of all guns. If every gun sold is registered to a person and that person loses the gun to theft or sale, a paper trail must follow. If one cannot account for their weapon they must be held accountable.
 
Murder did not begin with the gun and won't end if you eliminate it.

Legislation only affects those that abide by laws. The majority of crimes committed with guns are committed with weapons illegally owned to begin with. If we cannot enforce current legislation on criminals, how can one realistically expect that further legislation will have any impact?

Places with the highest percentages of gun ownership in the USA are not coincidentally the safest places to live. For those of you that doubt this, travel to middle America where everyone has a gun and violent crime is almost unheard of.

Contrast this with places with very strict gun control measures like Chicago or Washington D.C. and you see some of the highest murder rates in the country. For awhile, you would have been more likely to die of a gunshot wound in D.C. than from a gunshot wound as a US service member in Iraq. This is in a city that only up till recently effectively had an outright gun ban.

Regardless of any crime stats, you should study the intent of the founding fathers.
An armed citizenry is an important weapon against tyranny or mob rule. It's been proven time and time again throughout history. Unarmed citizens are easy to control.
You may think tyranny in the US is a far fetched notion but that is only because you are not a student of history.
Governments and nations are challenged, some rise, and all have inevitably fallen with some to have risen again. The one common theme is that armed (firearms or other) violence was always a factor either by action or by threat.

To believe that this trend has ceased on this planet is to believe in fairy tales of world peace and utopia.

If you wish to let someone else bear the burden of your protection, or risk your life and well being because of a utopian view of the world, don't let me stop you.
Likewise, don't impose your fairytale ideas of the world on me.

Excellent post Pablo!
 
As a Generation we are F!@#$d... We are the last gate keepers of the Second Amendment... fast forward >>>The MTV generation will let this happen (disarming of America), and not long after this generation is gone. I just hope we can hold out for another 20-30 years until that happens, hopefully not in my lifetime... this is a well thought out time phased plan to PSYOP Americans into not caring about surrendering their right to bear Arms.... Look at a majority of the Kids 15-35 years of age... Do you think protecting their rights is a priority... maybe the right to text message.... :confused:
 
hey now! i'm only 21. ;)
but i'll be the first tell you that you can have my guns bullets first!

i'm more afraid that by the time i get out of school and can finally afford my gun addiction legitimately, i won't even be able to buy a red ryder.

i tell ya cars and guns = NO money! :)
 
Guns cause crime like flies cause trash.

Why is there very little violent crime in places where there are lots of guns? If England has less violence due to the lack of guns then it follows that Switzerland and Israel would have proportionately more criminal violence - and they do not.

And to the foreigner that thinks our Constitution is stupid - I'm glad you don't like it - stay away!!! Don't come here!!!
 
Anybody read the whitehouse page? They are coming after the guns... How else can you make "all" the guns childproof?
 
Urban Policy

Address Gun Violence in Cities: Obama and Biden would repeal the Tiahrt Amendment, which restricts the ability of local law enforcement to access important gun trace information, and give police officers across the nation the tools they need to solve gun crimes and fight the illegal arms trade. Obama and Biden also favor commonsense measures that respect the Second Amendment rights of gun owners, while keeping guns away from children and from criminals. They support closing the gun show loophole and making guns in this country childproof. They also support making the expired federal Assault Weapons Ban permanent.

Better get what you can get NOW!!!!!!
 
'boma is a goddamnliar

The cops and the BATFE have access to the gun trace info and desire to keep it to themselves because the only reason to repeal the Tiahrt Amendment is for the traitor libtards to use it to harass gun owners and MFR's.

Also - there is no such thing as a gun show loophole. There was at one time but it was closed long ago; the term continues because it makes the ignorant public think that anybody can get what they want at a gun show and that is not true, all guns must be transferred via FFL. It is not even legal for a father to give a gun to his adult son as a gift - must be transferred as if it was bought new in a gun store just like gun show buys.

Either the White House does not know the most basic gun regulations or they are liars, or they traitors - I think they are all three = ignorant traitors and liars !!!!!!

In as much as he flip flopped on taxes three times already - I do not know how we can trust this chump :( Thanks a lot. goddamnamerica---http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nH5ixmT83JE
 
It is really not about gun control.

It is about people control!

They are slowly turning this country into socialist dictatorship and we are letting them.

Mikey
 
More laws won't make less crime. We already have laws on the books with serious consequences for crime. It is not enforced and that is the problem. Quit making life in jail better than life on the street for these criminals.
We just had some jerk killed by an armed 78 year old homeowner when he kicked in her front door. He had 33 arrests for burglary, auto theft, battery and assault since 1996. What do you think he would have done to her while she was trying to get her gun out of the safe?
We don't need more laws limiting the law abiding.

...citizen uses a gun defending themselves they go to jail over there. It doesn't matter what the odds against him were.
Dead is dead whether by gun, knife, club, whatever.

The gun lets a 95lb. 78 year old grandma even the odds with a 250lb. 25 year old assailant or assailants. That is the whole point of firearms!

Mikey

I don't advocate keeping guns locked away when you're home. You misunderstood. When out of the home I DO believe in responsibly securing the firearms not going along with me. And yes, just as guns aren't the only means of crime, they aren't the only means of security.
The Clyde Enterprise

Maybe if Frank had a machete on a nail at the back door it woulda bought him the ten more feet to a loaded shotgun. Too many what ifs...The only sure thing is that he's just the latest guy I used to know... At least Sandy has convinced my wife to get her permit...


As a Generation we are F!@#$d... We are the last gate keepers of the Second Amendment... fast forward >>>The MTV generation will let this happen (disarming of America), and not long after this generation is gone. I just hope we can hold out for another 20-30 years until that happens, hopefully not in my lifetime... this is a well thought out time phased plan to PSYOP Americans into not caring about surrendering their right to bear Arms.... Look at a majority of the Kids 15-35 years of age... Do you think protecting their rights is a priority... maybe the right to text message.... :confused:

Have you, or any of us taken some punk kid to a cons. club or range to shoot? At 18 I wasn't really into guns. A coworker twice my age(younger than I am now)invited me to his club trap shooting. An experience I'll never forget! Damn if I wasn't Good at it, and that Remington (3200 I think) was Awesome! I couldn't afford the hobby then, but at that point I knew I Wanted to! If nobody had ever put a damn fine piece of equipment in my hand and breifed me on it's use, then turned me loose to see my own results... I might be indifferent to what I will not accept today in gun control.
 
Have you, or any of us taken some punk kid to a cons. club or range to shoot? At 18 I wasn't really into guns. A coworker twice my age(younger than I am now)invited me to his club trap shooting. An experience I'll never forget! Damn if I wasn't Good at it, and that Remington (3200 I think) was Awesome! I couldn't afford the hobby then, but at that point I knew I Wanted to! If nobody had ever put a damn fine piece of equipment in my hand and breifed me on it's use, then turned me loose to see my own results... I might be indifferent to what I will not accept today in gun control.

Uhhh ummm yeah.... I'm an Active duty SFC (E-7) in the Army... I've taken younger Soldiers to the range not only to learn how to shoot but how to keep themselves and others alive... most of the youngers Soldiers I see are not into what "we" as a generation are into regardless of exposure to fire arms....
 
At least you have a chance to work with those who Will be required to use a gun. Who really cares what their interests are? My grandparents didn't like rock-n-roll or fast cars either! The real problem is our going from mediocrity to stupidity. Yeah and while we blame the boomers for F'ing it all up, who really let things slip to where they are now? Have we been blissfully unaware, apethetic or too self involved to change the dumbing down of America. Is it too many single parents, too many dual income households? I don't know but I'm disgusted with what my oldest doesn't need to know to get thru 5th grade. It's like cliffs notes education. Half A$$ed. My kids will learn what they need to, not just what they have to. Stupid people accustomed to having their stimulus spoon-fed thru videogames will be sheep to the slaughter of the constitiution. Who's to blame when it comes? This is broader than just gun control and our measures of counteraction must be too. Before this grand experiment is declared a failure.
 
At least you have a chance to work with those who Will be required to use a gun. Who really cares what their interests are? My grandparents didn't like rock-n-roll or fast cars either! The real problem is our going from mediocrity to stupidity. Yeah and while we blame the boomers for F'ing it all up, who really let things slip to where they are now? Have we been blissfully unaware, apethetic or too self involved to change the dumbing down of America. Is it too many single parents, too many dual income households? I don't know but I'm disgusted with what my oldest doesn't need to know to get thru 5th grade. It's like cliffs notes education. Half A$$ed. My kids will learn what they need to, not just what they have to. Stupid people accustomed to having their stimulus spoon-fed thru videogames will be sheep to the slaughter of the constitiution. Who's to blame when it comes? This is broader than just gun control and our measures of counteraction must be too. Before this grand experiment is declared a failure.


I agree with that statement. Living where I do, it's almost impossible to not introduce my sons to guns. We hunt, we fish, and for the most part we enjoy the outdoor sports. BTW, yes we use guns when fishing, at least when we are shark fishing off the coast!!

Take a kid hunting, doesn't matter if you don't own land or live in a city. Take the time to get a kid out in the outdoors, teach them about stewardship and responsiblility. Guns are a necessary tool when used in the proper manner. Sometimes I think we place to much emphasis on the defensive capabilities of guns. I use my guns on a regular basis, not to defend myself, but to hunt or help manage land.

Also, don't forget, the best means of self defense is common sense. I keep a gun, but in the end I should be mindful of my desisions and surroundings. Don't make poor decisions that will put you in a position to have to defend yourself. Most situations can be avoided with exercising some common sense.
 
We use guns to kill bowfin too:biggrin: They are heck on a bass bait:biggrin:
 
I believe all the items mentioned are not as bad as they would be with no enforcement IE regulation.
Could regulations be created that would do a better job? Yes more severe penalties and less leniency from the Courts. So answer is, the regulation of each has had an impact.
Key word here is better


You must be from the right. Say something and it must be true? LOL Canada's population has about 29% gun ownership compared to US 39%. They do have guns. Canada has a rate of homicide by guns of .076 per 100k population, US 3.72 per 100k.
England has about 5% gun ownership and deaths by guns at 0.11 per 100k
Both countries have much less total homicide then the US
What are you smoking?



I know it is a long read but we needed the facts.

Gun Ownership and Homicide Rates

GUNS IN OTHER COUNTRIES
Myth: Countries with strict gun control have less crime
Fact: In America, we can demonstrate that private ownership of guns reduces crime, but from country to country there is no correlation between gun availability and the violent crime rate. Consider this:
Use detailed data, we can contrast the per capita homicide rate with the per capita gun ownership rate between different industrialized countries. Doing so shows zero correlation between the availability of guns and the overall homicide rate.
Fact: Countries with the strictest gun-control laws also tended to have the highest homicide rates.324
Fact: According to the U.N., as of 2005, Scotland was the most violent country in the developed world, with people three times more likely to be assaulted than in America. Violent crime there has doubled over the last 20 years. 3% of Scots had been victims of assault compared with 1.2% in America 325
Fact: “ ... the major surveys completed in the past 20 years or more provides no evidence of any relationship between the total number of legally held firearms in society and the rate of armed crime. Nor is there a relationship between the severity of controls imposed in various countries or the mass of bureaucracy involved with many control systems with the apparent ease of access to firearms by criminals and terrorists.”326
324 “Violence, Guns and Drugs: A Cross-Country Analysis”, Jeffery A. Miron, Department of Economics, Boston University.
325 “Scotland tops list of world's most violent countries”, The Times, September 19, 2005
326 Colin Greenwood, “Minutes of Evidence”, Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs, January 29, 2003. Contact Crime Victimization Rates

Fact: Switzerland has relatively lenient gun control for Europe327, and has the third-lowest homicide rate of the top nine major European countries, and the same per capita rate as England and Wales.328
Fact: Indeed, the Swiss basically have a military rifle in nearly every closest. "Everybody who has served in the army is allowed to keep their personal weapon, even after the end of their military service."329
Fact: “We don't have as many guns [in Brazil] as the United States, but we use them more.”330 Brazil has mandatory licensing, registration, and maximum personal ownership quotas. It now bans any new sales to private citizens. Their homicide rate is almost three (3) times higher than the U.S.331
Fact: In Canada around 1920, before there was any form of gun control, their homicide rate was 7% of the U.S rate. By 1986, and after significant gun control legislation, Canada’s homicide rate was 35% of the U.S. rate – a significant increase. 332 In 2003, Canada had a violent crime
327 In Switzerland, handguns are obtainable once a person obtains a simple police permit that is valid for six months. “Federal law over weapons, weapon accessories and ammunition (weapon law, WG)”, Federal Assembly of the Swiss Confederation, May 2007 - http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/5/514.54.de.pdf
328 Carol Kalish, International Crime Rates, Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report (Washington: Department of Justice, May 1988). 1984 data for Switzerland, and the 1983 data for England and Wales.
329 Swiss Defense Ministry statement, May 15, 2004 ,”Army rifles remain racked at home”, swissinfo - Swiss news and information platform about Switzerland, business, culture, sport, weather.
330 Rubem César Fernandes, executive secretary of Viva Rio, a nongovernmental agency that studies urban crime, Christian Science Monitor, “Chocolates for guns? Brazil targets gun violence.”
331 U.S. data Bureau of Justice Statistics, “Homicide trends in the United States”, September, 2004. Brazil data Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2005.
332 Gary Kleck, “Targetting Guns”, 1997 at 360.
U.K. Violent Crime and Firearm Ownership rate more than double that of the U.S. (963 vs. 475 per 100,000).333
Fact: Many of the countries with the strictest gun control have the highest rates of violent crime. Australia and England, which have virtually banned gun ownership, have the highest rates of robbery, sexual assault, and assault with force of the top 17 industrialized countries.334
Fact: The crime rate is 66% higher in four Canadian prairie provinces than in the northern US states across the border.335
Fact: Strict controls over existing arms failed in Finland. Despite needs-based licensing, storage laws, transportation restrictions,336 Finland experienced a multiple killing school shooting in 2007.337
Myth: Britain has strict gun control and a low crime rate
Fact: Since gun banning has escalated in the UK, the rate of crime – especially violent crime – has risen.
Fact: Ironically, firearm use in crimes has doubled in the decade since handguns were banned.338
Fact: 67% of those with an opinion believe that “As a result of gun and knife crime, the area I live in is not as safe as it was five years ago.”339
333 Juristat: Crime Statistics in Canada, 2004 and FBI Uniform Crime Statistics online.
334 Dutch Ministry of Justice, Criminal Victimization in Seventeen Industrialized Countries, 2001.
335 “A Comparison of Violent and Firearm Crime Rates in the Canadian Prairie Provinces and Four U.S. Border States, 1961-2003”, Parliamentary Research Branch of the Library of Parliament, March 7, 2005.
336 United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, “National Report by Finland”.
337 Pekka-Eric Auvinen shooting in Tuusula, Finland on November 8, 2007.
338 “Weapons sell for just £50 as suspects and victims grow ever younger”, The Times, August 24, 2007.
339 YouGov survey of 2,156 residents in Sept 2007.
U.K. Violent Crime and Firearm Ownership

Fact: Street robberies soared 28% in 2001. Violent crime was up 11%, murders up 4%, and rapes are up 14%.340
Fact: This trend continues in 2004 with a 10% increase in street crime, 8% increase in muggings, and a 22% increase in robberies.
Fact: In 1919, before it had any gun control, the U.K. had a homicide rate that was 8% of the U.S. rate. By 1986, and after enacting significant gun control, the rate was 9% – practically unchanged.341
Fact: “ ... [There is] nothing in the statistics for England and Wales to suggest that either the stricter controls on handguns prior to 1997 or the ban imposed since have controlled access to such firearms by criminals.”342
Fact: Comparing crime rates between America and Britain is flawed. In America, a gun crime is recorded as a gun crime. In Britain, a crime is only recorded when there is a final disposition (a conviction). All unsolved gun crimes in Britain are not reported as gun crimes, grossly undercounting the amount of gun crime there. 343 To make matters worse, British law enforcement has been exposed for falsifying criminal reports to create falsely lower crime figures, in part to preserve tourism.344
Fact: A continuing parliamentary inquiry into the growing number of black market weapons has concluded that there are more than three million illegally held firearms in circulation - double the number believed to have been held 10 years ago - and that criminals are more willing than ever to use them. One in three criminals under the age of 25 possesses or has access to a firearm. 345
Fact: Handgun homicides in England and Wales reached an all-time high in 2000, years after a virtual ban on private handgun ownership. More than 3,000 crimes involving handguns were
340 British Home Office, reported by BBC news, July 12, 2002.
341 Gary Kleck, “Targetting Guns”, 1997 at 359.
342 Colin Greenwood, “Minutes of Evidence”, Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs, January 29, 2003.
343 Gallant, Hills, Kopel, “Fear in Britain”, Independence Institute, July 18, 2000.
344 “Crime Figures a Sham, Say Police “, Daily Telegraph, April 1, 1996.
345 Reported in The Guardian, September 3, 2000.
recorded in 1999-2000, including the 42 homicides, 310 cases of attempted murder, 2,561 robberies and 204 burglaries.346
Fact: Handguns were used in 3,685 offences in 2000 compared with 2,648 in 1997, an increase of 40%.347 It is interesting to note:
• Of the 20 areas with the lowest number of legal firearms, 10 had an above average level of "gun crime."
• Of the 20 areas with the highest levels of legal guns, only 2 had armed crime levels above the average.
Fact: Between 1997 and 1999, there were 429 murders in London, the highest two-year figure for more than 10 years – nearly two-thirds of those involved firearms – in a country that has virtually banned private firearm ownership.348
Fact: Over the last century, the British crime rate was largely unchanged. In the late nineteenth century, the per capita homicide rate in Britain was between 1.0 and 1.5 per 100,000.349 In the late twentieth century, after a near ban on gun ownership, the homicide rate is around 1.4.350 This shows that the homicide rate does not vary with either the level of gun control or gun availability.
Fact: The U.K. has strict gun control and a rising homicide rate of 1.4 per 100,000. Switzerland has the highest per capita firearm ownership rate on the planet (all males age 20 to 42 are required to keep rifles or pistols at home) has a homicide rate of 1.2 per 100,000. And to date, there has never been a schoolyard massacre in Switzerland.351
Fact: "… the scale of gun crime in the capital [London] has forced senior officers to set up a specialist unit to deal with ... shootings."352
Myth: Gun control in Australia is curbing crime
Fact: Crime rose after a sweeping ban on private gun ownership. In the first two years after gun-owners were forced to surrender 640,381 personal firearms, government statistics show a dramatic increase in criminal activity.353In 2001-2002, homicides were up another 20%. 354
Offence category
Increase from pre-ban
Armed robbery
170.1%
Kidnapping/abduction
144.0%
Assault
130.9%
Attempted murder
117.6%
Sexual assault
112.6%
346 “42 killed by handguns last year “, The Times, January 10, 2001, reporting on statistics supplied by the British Home Office.
347 “Illegal Firearms in the UK”, Centre for Defense Studies at King's College in London, July 2001.
348 Ibid.
349 Clive Emsley, Crime and Society in England 1750-1900, at 36 (1987).
350 Stephen P. Halbrook, “Where Kids and Guns Do Mix”, Wall Street Journal, June 1999.
351 Ibid.
352 Associated News Media, April 30, 2001.
353 Australian Bureau of Statistics, “Crime and Justice - Crimes Recorded by Police”, 2000.
From the inception of firearm confiscation to March 27, 2000, the numbers are:
• Gun murders up 19%
• Armed robbery up 69%
• Home invasions up 21%
The sad part is that in the 15 years before national gun confiscation:
• Firearm-related homicides dropped nearly 66%.
• Firearm-related deaths fell 50%.
Fact: Gun crimes are rising throughout Australia after guns were banned. In Sydney alone, robbery rates with guns rose 160% in 2001, more in the previous year.355
Fact: A ten year study that concluded Australian firearm confiscation had no effect on crime rates.356
Myth: Japan has strict gun control and a less violent society
Fact: In Japan, the murder rate is almost 1 per 100,000. In the U.S., there are about 3.2 murders per 100,000 people each year by weapons other than firearms.357 This means that even if firearms in the U.S. could be eliminated, we would still have three times the murder rate of the Japanese. Japan’s murder rate may be low, but its suicide rate is over 20 per 100,000 people. Japanese are being murdered and committing suicide at a rate of about 21 per 100,000. In the U.S., our combined murder and suicide rate is about 21 also.
Myth: Gun bans enacted elsewhere work
Fact: Though illegal, side-street gun makers thrive in the Philippines, mainly making submachine guns which are the simplest to manufacture. Estimates are that almost ½ of all guns in the Philippines are illegal.358
Fact: Chinese police destroyed 113 illegal gun factories and shops in a three-month crackdown in 2006. Police seized 2,445 tons of explosives, 4.81 million detonators and 117,000 guns.359
354 Australian Institute of Criminology, “Report #46: Homicide in Australia, 2001-2002", April 2003.
355 The Sydney Morning Herald, “Costa targets armed robbers”, April 4, 2002.
356 "Gun Laws and Sudden Death: Did the Australian Firearms Legislation of 1996 Make a Difference?", Dr. Jeanine Baker and Dr. Samara McPhedran, British Journal of Criminology, November 2006.
357 Japan data “1996 Demographic Yearbook”, United Nations, 1998: US data FBI Uniform Crime Statistics, 1996.
358 “Filipino gunsmiths are making a killing”, Taipei Times, May 7, 2005.
359 China Radio International Online, September 7, 2006.
Myth: The United States has the highest violence rate because of lax gun control
Country
Homicides per 100,000 population
Colombia
62
Jamaica
32
Russia
20
Mexico
13
Estonia
10
Latvia
10
Lithuania
10
Belarus
9
Papua New Guinea
8
Kyrgyzstan
8
Fact: The top 10 countries for homicide do not include the U.S.360
360 United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Centre for International Crime Prevention, Seventh United Nations Survey of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems, covering the period 1998 – 2000.

I listed all my sources, where did you get your facts from?

Mikey
 
Top