Dyno Challenge Results.

Status
Not open for further replies.

RUQWKNF

KEEPER OF SECRETS
Staff member
Joined
May 26, 2001
First, I want to say a big Thank You to Richard, for letting us use his dyno for the day and also for letting us use his tools and resources for anything our guys needed. We Greatly Appreciate all of it and your hospitality. What an awesome shop.

Next, I'd like to say Thank You to Shane for putting on this event in the first place. I know I'll definitely be back next year for sure.

Also, Thank You to our 5 participants for dyno-ing their cars and not holding anything back. It was great to see the guys open up their turbo boxes. Sorta like a kid on Christmas morning type moment. Smiles all around. :D
.
.
.
The plan was to let each car owner make 3 dyno pulls and swap turbos. But we were not locked into just 3 pulls. This is on a conservative Mustang Dyno.

So without further delay, here are the 5 cars and their combos, and the results.




Up first was Rick Hunt with his white GNXray. His combination consisted of a .020 over rebuilt 109, ported iron heads with matching intake, 210/205 cam, stock upper plenum and throttle body, TE-44 turbo with HD actuator, Precision Stock Location IC, 60# injectors with 93 octane Turbo Tweak chip. Hot wired XP pump, adj fuel pressure regulator, good plug wires, stock headers and crossover pipe, 3" BGC downpipe into 2.5" cat back exhaust. 3" MAF pipe with cone K&N filter, Scanmaster & Powerlogger with WB O2 sensor. 200 tranmission with a Dayco 2400 stall converter. Stock rear end. Running on GNX wheels with regular radials. A very nice combination. For his turbo, I chose one of our Billet 6265 turbos with the air cooled dual ball bearing cartridge and a .63 A/R housing.

TE-44 pulls

1st pull = 318 hp @ 4875 rpm / 359.7 tq @ 4144 rpm. Boost 17psi, 18* WOT timing

2nd pull = 316.9 hp @ 5089 rpm / 364.7 tq @ 4132 rpm. Boost 16.7psi, 18* WOT timing.

3rd pull = 298.8 hp @ 4973 rpm / 331.3 tq @ 4189 rpm. Boost 14.5psi, same WOT timing.



Billet 6265 with ACBB pulls


1st pull = 308.2 hp @ 5249 rpm / 322.1 tq @ 4854 rpm. Boost 15.9psi, 18* WOT timing.

2nd pull = 319.8 hp @ 5447 rpm / 333.9 tq @ 4796 rpm. Boost 16.7psi, same timing.

3rd pull = 313.7 hp @ 5454 rpm / 327.8 tq @ 4902 rpm. Boost 16.2psi, same timing.

At this point, Jack Cotton mentioned to Harry about which wastegate actuator we were running? My reasoning was to run a standard spring actuator due to 93 octane fuel limitations and I did not want the boost to run away and hurt his motor on pump gas. Not thinking about the wg puck cracking open too soon and hurting hp and tq down low, but that is exactly what was happening. Harry noticed that the puck was starting to open at around 7psi, which was killing all his bottom end torque. Boost was just linear with rpm at that point. Thankfully, Rick had a heavy duty actuator from his TE-44 that he could bolt on. Which he did. Well, we ran out of time to re-dyno his car after the actuator swap, but we were able to make another pull, first thing Tuesday morning. We added a little more fuel and made the last pull. The results were favorable.

4th pull = 337 hp @ 5241 rpm / 348.1 tq @ 4759 rpm. 17.7psi and same timing.

So this gives him a hp difference of 19 hp at almost exactly the same boost level. (17psi vs 17.7psi) Very good start.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2nd up was Steve Thompson and his '67 Firebird. His combinaiton consisted of a RPE built TA block 274 CI motor, fully ported GN1-R heads, Champion intake, XFI with internal datalogger, Cast GT4276 journal bearing turbo. 160# injectors, Weldon 2015 pump, 4" downpipe, 3.5" exhaust, TH350 trans with brake, custom converter and custom air to air intercooler. Cal was doing the tuning.


Cast GT4276 journal bearing pulls


1st pull = 672.9 hp @ 6912 rpm / 552.5 tq @ 6473 rpm. 25 psi

2nd pull = 682.8 hp @ 7015 rpm / 510.9 tq @ 7015 rpm. 25 psi

3rd pull = 742.2 hp @ 6734 rpm / 579.5 tq @ 6594 rpm. 25.4 psi



Billet HP7675 ACBB pulls


1st pull = 772.8 hp @ 6690 rpm / 610.4 tq @ 6619 rpm. 24.5 psi

2nd pull = 815.1 hp @ 6813 rpm / 628.3 tq @ 6813 rpm. 27.7 psi

3rd pull = 832 hp @ 6861 rpm / 657.9 tq @ 6842 rpm. 28.3 psi

4th pull = 820.8 hp @ 6861 rpm / 628.8 tq @ 6836 rpm. 29.8 psi

So, this gives him a hp difference of 30.6 hp with almost 1 psi of boost. Which is awesome. Of course he made more power with only 3.8 psi more boost. 832 hp is a big number for sure.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Our 3rd player in the game was Tyler Shull and his GN. His combo consisted of a Cast 6765 dbb turbo with S cover and .63 A/R 3-bolt housing, .030 over 109 block, stock crank & rods, T&D roller rockers, Champion ported and polished iron heads and matching intake, , CAS V4 stock location intercooler, PTC 3200 converter with 200 trans, Red's double pumper kit, 60# injectors, Razor's alky injection kit, Turbotweak alky chip with PLX wideband O2 and Powerlogger. The turbo I chose for this car, was our Billet 6765 with air cooled ball bearing chra. So, the only thing that changed on this test was the compressor wheel and air cooled dual bb chra.


Cast 6765 dbb, S cover.


1st pull = 428.2 hp @ 5107 rpm / 457.2 tq @ 4816 rpm. Detonation. 22 psi.

2nd pull = 452.8 hp @ 5061 rpm / 474 tq @ 4970 rpm. 20.9 psi.



Billet 6765 air cooled bb, S cover.


1st pull = 429 hp @ 5110 rpm / 448.6 tq @ 4847 rpm. 20 psi.

2nd pull = 458.4 hp @ 5185 rpm / 480.3 tq @ 4930 rpm. 21.5 psi.

3rd pull = 482.6 hp @ 5229 rpm / 495.1 tq @ 4915 rpm. 23 psi.

So, he picked up 29.8 hp with only 2 psi more. Which shows the power potential of the Billet 67 wheel once the boost is turned up past 20psi. Nice gains. And he told me that the spool up difference on the street was incredible.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our 4th contestant was Derek Godwin and his '86 T-Type. His combo was a Cast PT70 GTQ journal bearing turbo with a T4 .68 A/R housing. Built 109 block, 235 CI with Diamond pistons, block girdle, 218/212 hydraulic roller cam, Eagle crank, Oliver rods, ARP fasteners throughout. PTE Oil filtration kit, ported and polished iron heads with matching intake, roller rockers, 70mm throttle body, 70mm upper plenum, Cotton's Performance front mount intercooler, Turbosmart external wastegate. XFI EMS system, individual EGT setup, volt booster, 83# injectors through stock fuel lines, alky injection kit, dual XP in tank pumps. 3.5" downpipe into dual 3" cat back exhaust system. PTC converter in a TH400 trans with brake. 3.42 gears with spool. For Derek's combo, I chose one of our Billet 71 HPQ turbos with our ACBB cartridge. And because of this ACBB cartridge, I wanted to see the spool up difference between the T4 .81 A/R housing and the T4 .68. I figured it should not be that difficult to spool it and he would have very good flow capability with the .81 housing. Jack was tuning.



Cast PT70 GTQ T4 .68 pulls


1st pull = 449.4 hp @ 5327 rpm / 492.7 tq @ 4782 rpm. 21 psi.

2nd pull = 493.6 hp @ 5147 rpm / 518.2 tq @ 4902 rpm. 24 psi.

3rd pull = 536.3 hp @ 5261 rpm / 545.9 tq @ 5062 rpm. 28 psi.


Billet 71 HPQ ACBB T4 .81 pulls


1st pull = 505 hp @ 5196 rpm / 514.2 tq @ 5011 rpm. 24.5 psi.

2nd pull = 558.6 hp @ 5390 rpm / 553.6 tq @ 5185 rpm. 30 psi.

So he made 22.3 more hp with only 2 psi more. And spool up was very nice.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our 5th contestant was Steve Sullivan and his TSM class legal car. His combination consisted of a Cast PT70 HPQ journal bearing and TSM legal turbo. 240 CI 109 block TSM motor. Billet crank, Champion GN-1 heads fully ported with matching Champion stock style intake. 218/218 billet roller cam, Cotton's Performance front mount intercooler, Fast Bank to Bank system, ATI torque converter and TA Performance headers. Car has run a 9.54 @ 142 at 3600#. Jack Cotton was tuning.



Cast PT70 HPQ pulls


1st and only pull = 608.2 hp @ 6170 rpm / 540.1 tq @ 5699 rpm. 27.4 psi.



Billet 71 HPQ with ACBB chra pulls


1st pull = 605.4 hp @ 6259 rpm / 508 tq @ 6258 rpm. 27 psi.

2nd pull = 612.5 hp @ 6252 rpm / 515.1 tq @ 6239 rpm. 26 psi.

3rd pull = 608.1 hp @ 6095 rpm / 609.8 tq @ 5449 rpm. 26 psi.


So, on his 2nd pull, he was able to make 4.3 hp more with 1.4 psi less boost. Which is very good all things considered. I'm sure if we would have had more time, they could have tuned more into the combo.



I took video of each and every dyno pull. I need to get them edited up and posted on You Tube, which might take me some time as my skillz are a little rusty. I also have some pictures I took that I need to get on my PB account that I will post up as well. Which should not take very long at all.

When the dust settled, all 5 of the contestants were happy with the results. And all of them happily purchased their turbos. One thing that these numbers do not show, is the actual difference in spool up characteristics between the two turbos. The dyno did not have that capability, but I'm sure the guys could review their data logs and tell us some very valuable info. Temps hovered in the 50*- 57* range on both days and when that fan kicked on, it got cold in the dyno room. No casualties were experienced, except of course for tire wear, he he he. :D



So there you have it everyone. I was pleasantly surprised with the results. Too see the smiles on everyone's faces was priceless. Again, I'd like to Thank Richard for his generous hospitality and for letting these guys use his tools and resources whenever they needed anything. And I do mean anything. That was way more than we ever expected. Also, I'd like to thank you 5 guys again, for participating in this challenge. I thought it went very smoothly.

I would also like to thank Paul, for all his hard work and with running the dyno. You did great and it was very nice working with you.

And Gene, thank you for all your help and wrenching. You really helped alot of us out and we all greatly appreciate it.

Also, Bob Bailey with his tuning help and first hand Inventor/Creator help with our guys who were using his Power Logger. I can't tell you how Awesome that is, to have the person who invented the Power Logger there to help you with your tune and your datalogs. You can't get any better than that.

And last, but certainly not least, I'd like to personally thank Clint for all his hard work and organizational skills. I would not have been able to make this happen without your help and guidance. You did an Excellent job. And I know you're still hard at it, at the track.

I thoroughly enjoyed my time at the event and can't wait to go back next year. Thanks again to all of you who made this happen and who helped me. Richard, Clint, Shane, Paul, Gene, Cal, Otto, Jack, Harry, Bob

Patrick Rubio
 
More power, less boost. Kool. Did each participant purchase the Billet turbo after or did some choose not to?
 
All 5 participants purchased their turbos after the dyno challenge was over.
:D

Patrick
 
I'm sure a Dynojet would have yielded much higher dyno numbers.

A few people got a hell of a deal on their turbo's. Im sure next year will be an even better event.
 
wow, great info thanks for sharing. i was waiting for this post. im sure you will see some turbo sales in the near future.
 
Thanks Patrick, I have been waiting for this with baited breath.
 
Interesting results. It would have been cool to have a stock long block/turbo thrown in there for comparo too.
 
Very cool Patrick. I'm really impressed with Steve Thompsons results most of all. I didn't think there would be much in the 70 to 71 billet HPQ test. The 70 can move plenty of air to run 9.0's. It's really going to take the right combo to bring the real difference out.
 
On the 1st car...

So i bet there are a bunch of TR's with the std duty actuator that are having the same issue and don't know it. What about a RJC (or similar) boost controler,wouldn't that have the same affect as HD actuator since they limit flow to the actuator until the air pressure over comes the ball and spring?

Nice test and I will definately being buy one this year.
 
Some pics from Monday.

DSC02348.jpg



DSC02350.jpg



DSC02351.jpg



DSC02353.jpg



DSC02357.jpg



DSC02358.jpg



DSC02360.jpg



DSC02361.jpg



DSC02362.jpg



DSC02363.jpg



Still working on the videos.

Patrick
 
Patrick,

Looking forward to the videos.
If I could make one request, please no music.
We want to hear what the turbos sound like.
 
New Turbo

I would like to thank Precision Turbo & Engine for holding this wonderful event and all the people from their shop…. I would also like to thank all the experts that helped work on these cars from Harry and Patrick, Cal Hartline, Jack Cotton, Bob Bailey, Paul, Gene and all the others who supported the dyno runs and of course Richard for the fantastic facility.

As for the performance of my car, I was very pleased with the gains that were made with the new turbo running ONLY pump gas. I believe we could have made even more power if more time were spent on the dyno with additional tuning, but we had several cars to run and it was on there long enough. I’m sure real gains will be achieved when I put more boost into it.

After talking to the experts present about this turbo and the untapped performance gains that were capable, along with a little convincing I decided to add an alky kit to the vehicle. This allowed me to bring the new turbo into its happy place of more boost. So we called Julio of Alky Control and installed his kit at Richards shop Friday morning. Needless to say the new turbo and the alky worked but was able to bring my MPH up 6.5 in the eighth mile and lower my E/T by .844 at the track. Yes that is not a typing error and it was done on regular radials to boot. And the truth of the matter is, it is not even close to it's potential yet, as I need to do more tuning in order to gain the optimum performance at only 21 psi of boost I was running. Plus I know additional boost can be used, but I have just started with this system and I need to walk before I can run.

I was not planning on putting this on my car as the TT chip I was running was not made for running alky. I changed the timing from 18-20 to 20-22 after my first run down the track.

My first impressions of the turbo are very favorable. Even before adding the alky it's a wonderful turbo. Considering its size its does not need a high RPM stalls torque converter, as my restalled 12" converter spools it up just fine. Overall, this turbo is excellent for the street.

After talking to Patrick more in depth about this turbo, he said the real sweet spot is in the 18 to 28psi range. With potential to make even more power beyond that.
I’m taking the car out for a ride……see you on the street.:D
 
A HUGE thank you to patrick and precision ! i couldn't be happier with the turbo. I can't tell any difference in the spool up, but we did go from a .63 ar to an .81 ! So, with that said, I think it was a win win ! Same spool up with a larger exhaust housing is great ! Again thanks for all your help, knowledge, and especially the great deal on a turbo !!!
 
I hope all the billet wheel haters read this :D


Ok... I wasn't going to post anything but... And FWIW, I'm not a billet wheel hater as I had one of the, if not the very first billet 6768!!

But last year on Richard Clark's dyno we had a Te45a P-trim car make more HP & TQ at the same boost level (20psi) as the 6765 car listed above with a smaller combination otherwise!!. We never went higher than the 20psi with it...

Also last year we had a car there with a very old version Limit Engineering Te70 Q-trim that made the same HP but much more torque as Derek's billet-71turbo at the same boost level (24psi). Again with a smaller combination otehrwise!!. We never went higher than 24psi with it.

I'm not posting this to "call out" anyone's car, combination, or tuner. But I would like to hear thoughts from the turbo guru's....??


K.
 
Ok... I wasn't going to post anything but... And FWIW, I'm not a billet wheel hater as I had one of the, if not the very first billet 6768!!

But last year on Richard Clark's dyno we had a Te45a P-trim car make more HP & TQ at the same boost level (20psi) as the 6765 car listed above with a smaller combination otherwise!!. We never went higher than the 20psi with it...

Also last year we had a car there with a very old version Limit Engineering Te70 Q-trim that made the same HP but much more torque as Derek's billet-71turbo at the same boost level (24psi). Again with a smaller combination otehrwise!!. We never went higher than 24psi with it.

I'm not posting this to "call out" anyone's car, combination, or tuner. But I would like to hear thoughts from the turbo guru's....??


K.
I think it's pretty common knowledge now that the Billet wheels make their power at the higher boost levels not lower.
 
I think it's pretty common knowledge now that the Billet wheels make their power at the higher boost levels not lower.


Ok... But it's also common knowlege that the Te45a shines at higher levels, not lower as well...

Also... Derek's car made much higher #'s last year as well, but I'm not too sure on what his boost levels were then.


K.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top