Recent content by Darth Fiero

They've been busy.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/epa-fines-tuning-company-dollar300000-for-producing-and-selling-emissions-defeat-devices/ar-AAAFtvl?ocid=spartandhp

Back peddling indeed... Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-08-18/u-s-sues-harley-for-selling-emission-control-defeat-devices

He's lucky one of those fence posts he rolled over didn't impale him. That street is probably one of the worst ones you could possibly pick to race on. Blunt curbs, chain link fences, and other nearby obstacles to hit if you go off the road surface. An abandoned airport runway would be much...

You think I'm acting butthurt? LOL. I could care less about you and turbo89's opinions of me, personally; I think your statements show how immature both of you are. I'm not new to the internet message forum game - I've seen this all before. I don't need your apology if it is going to be...

I posted my opinions, you posted yours. Then others came into the discussion and raised other "what if" scenarios - and I reply with how I can see the EPA doing this or that in response to those. What was I supposed to do, in your eyes? Make one statement in this whole thread and just go away...

I see what you posted (said), and I comprehend that you said it, but what good is it? It's just your opinion. No facts, no explanation, no legal precedent provided to back up your claims.

Good, play it and post up the video. Until then, your talk is worth about 2 dead flies.

It's difficult to comprehend information that isn't there. All you've said is they "can't", "won't", and even if they do, "it will be met with stiff resistance". That's not information, that's your opinion. I think it is you having the problem comprehending things. I'm asking for proof...

Didn't all of those laws and regulations you cited have grandfather clauses written into them? PLEASE SHOW ME IN THIS PROPOSED EPA REGULATION WHERE THE GRANDFATHER CLAUSE IS.

So are you saying what happened to Casper's isn't more plausible under these new regs?

So if I get hauled into court by the EPA, do you think "THEY CANT ENFORCE THIS" is going to be a viable argument I can use that will cause the judge to dismiss the case?

The burden of proof is on you because you are the one making the claim nothing can or will happen. And you are also making the claim that even if it does get passed, there are loopholes and ways around it. I just want to hear about these loopholes and ways around the law you seem to know.

Are you saying you have no factual information to back up your argument?

I see the lips moving, but I don't hear anything of substance being said.