Anyone else had enough of the way cops are being treated these days

You usually find what you are looking for. I support your right to express your opions. I hope you support mine. when people side with criminals over the police, I know when to walk away. We will never see eye to eye. Whats going on, when (the incident that started this thread) the parents of the girl shot now wants a federal investigation. When you look at the record she collected at only 16 they need to be indicted for unleashing their offspring on the american public.great parenting it would be great if you could respond to the topic rather than hand pick a few incidents
 
I respect opinions and I am very far from being a liberal. I detest their beliefs. Not all northerners are liberals.
As a matter of fact, we, Massachusetts, have a republican governor.

D
 
http://www.centralmaine.com/2014/11...hief-expected-to-plead-guilty-to-sex-assault/

Police chief sexually assaults 4 year old, only has to serve 4 years, more of the good ole boy deals of a life time, its has nothing to do with failing to do there job, its pure evil, and they continue to get special treatment.

http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_25754803/san-jose-cop-accused-rape-faces-new-charge

Another pos predator allowed out on low bail to harm new victims, why? because of his magic blue suit, like I said 0 accountability, respect has to be earned.

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/child-molesting-cops-treated-corrupt-police-state/

30 days for sodomizing a minor, once again special treatment.

I could go on all day, want me to continue?

1. http://www.postbulletin.com/news/cr...cle_33c8ce56-b34a-53b8-8fca-6275c3e7b00b.html

120 day sentence for same act....must be a retired cop or something. :rolleyes: Oh wait, I'm sure they would have mentioned that.

2. $100,000 is not low bail. The supposed victim only made the claim AFTER being locked up for DUI, which she pled no contest to and got ZERO jail time and only PROBATION. So she's not a risk to go out and harm anyone huh??? From what I'm reading, the DNA evidence they have is the cop's bullet proof vest, skin dander on the vest. That could just as easily have gotten on there if they had had CONSENSUAL SEX. You don't find it strange that her claim only occurred AFTER she was locked up? Of course you don't.... ;)

3. The incident apparently occurred BEFORE he became a cop.

http://www.fauquier.com/news/article/state_trooper_found_guilty_of_sex_abuse_charges

"Three of the charges to which Carson pleaded guilty stemmed from a series of incidents in 2001 where Carson, then 18, sexually assaulted a boy who was in seventh and eighth grade, said Assistant Commonwealth Attorney Jamey Cook at Wednesday's hearing.

In a proffer statement of accusations, Cook said Carson exposed himself to the child and masturbated in front of and with him. One night, Cook said, the boy woke up to find Carson performing oral sex on him.

Carson told the victim, "This is what friends do for one another," Cook said.

Investigation into Carson started when the victim, now an adult, told his probation officer that he was uncomfortable being watched during a urine test.

When asked, the victim said he had been abused as a child by someone who was now a police officer, Cook said. The victim said that national media coverage of Jerry Sandusky's sex abuses compelled him to come forward with his allegations, Cook said.

Carson joined the Virginia State Police in 2005 and was assigned to the Culpeper Division's Area 12 office in Warrenton."

OH WOWWWWW.....he told his PROBATION OFFICER. I'm shocked, shocked I tell ya!!!


Yeah bro please continue....cause you've failed miserably at your first attempt. :ROFLMAO::LOL:
 
If this conversation was taking place in person with an on duty policeman,
I wonder how long it would take before being asked to produce identification and getting arrested for disorderly conduct because of exercising our first amendment rights?

D
Conversation? LMAO What conversation? You can't have a conversation with a closed minded individual such as yourself and Mackin. After about a minute of listening to you in person, I'd just shake my head and drive off, leaving you to continue the verbal intercourse with yourself. :D
 
Speak for yourself, the cops 99 percent of the time make it worse, and dont give a shit about saving anybody, I could post numerous examples of there cowardice, more likely then them helping you, expect some do gooder neighbor to call 911 because your yelling at your child about bad grades, or whatever, and the cops show up and kill one of you.
125917-Jennifer-Lawrence-eagle-gif-Im-D2L5.gif
 
1. http://www.postbulletin.com/news/cr...cle_33c8ce56-b34a-53b8-8fca-6275c3e7b00b.html

120 day sentence for same act....must be a retired cop or something. :rolleyes: Oh wait, I'm sure they would have mentioned that.

2. $100,000 is not low bail. The supposed victim only made the claim AFTER being locked up for DUI, which she pled no contest to and got ZERO jail time and only PROBATION. So she's not a risk to go out and harm anyone huh??? From what I'm reading, the DNA evidence they have is the cop's bullet proof vest, skin dander on the vest. That could just as easily have gotten on there if they had had CONSENSUAL SEX. You don't find it strange that her claim only occurred AFTER she was locked up? Of course you don't.... ;)

3. The incident apparently occurred BEFORE he became a cop.

http://www.fauquier.com/news/article/state_trooper_found_guilty_of_sex_abuse_charges

"Three of the charges to which Carson pleaded guilty stemmed from a series of incidents in 2001 where Carson, then 18, sexually assaulted a boy who was in seventh and eighth grade, said Assistant Commonwealth Attorney Jamey Cook at Wednesday's hearing.

In a proffer statement of accusations, Cook said Carson exposed himself to the child and masturbated in front of and with him. One night, Cook said, the boy woke up to find Carson performing oral sex on him.

Carson told the victim, "This is what friends do for one another," Cook said.

Investigation into Carson started when the victim, now an adult, told his probation officer that he was uncomfortable being watched during a urine test.

When asked, the victim said he had been abused as a child by someone who was now a police officer, Cook said. The victim said that national media coverage of Jerry Sandusky's sex abuses compelled him to come forward with his allegations, Cook said.

Carson joined the Virginia State Police in 2005 and was assigned to the Culpeper Division's Area 12 office in Warrenton."

OH WOWWWWW.....he told his PROBATION OFFICER. I'm shocked, shocked I tell ya!!!


Yeah bro please continue....cause you've failed miserably at your first attempt. :ROFLMAO::LOL:
You suck at reading comprehension, it said Three of the charges, hence the guy is a SERIAL PEDOPHILE, thats just when he started hurting children, this guy was released on 5k bond, he doesnt have to register as a sex offender, he could live next to you, and you will never know it, you failed miserably at your call out attempt, maybe you a pedophile and thats why your sticking up for them.
 
The same judge in another very similar case

If I haven’t presented enough information in this article to convince you that Officer Carson received a free pass, then consider for a second that Judge Whisenant presided over a very similar case in 2012. In that case, thirty five year old Donald Hausen was charged with sexual battery, manufacturing child pornography, and distribution and possession of child pornography. He was convicted and sentenced to 66 years, and will also have to register as a sex offender upon release. - See more at: http://libertywarrior.com/police-of...-days-jail-plea-bargain/#sthash.rvxnvFKb.dpuf
seems fair, 66 years vs 30 days and not register as a sex offender, keep justifying.
 
You suck at reading comprehension, it said Three of the charges, hence the guy is a SERIAL PEDOPHILE, thats just when he started hurting children, this guy was released on 5k bond, he doesnt have to register as a sex offender, he could live next to you, and you will never know it, you failed miserably at your call out attempt, maybe you a pedophile and thats why your sticking up for them.
Ummmm you do realize you can have multiple charges at one time in regard to ONE INCIDENT.....don't you? Keep reading those libertarian sites bro....it's really paying off for you. :D
 
The guy has a 10 year history of crimes against children, and was released on 5k bail, thank god for his magic blue suit.
 
The same judge in another very similar case

seems fair, 66 years vs 30 days and not register as a sex offender, keep justifying.
Similar case? How do you know that, cause some retarded, cop hating, libertarian website said so? Guess if it's on da nets, it must be so. :rolleyes:
 
The guy has a 10 year history of crimes against children, and was released on 5k bail, thank god for his magic blue suit.
Is that what it said? Quote it.

The CRIMINAL claims the cop did this to him 10 YEARS AGO. Only ONE person is claiming this.

Keeeeppppp reaching.
 
Ummmm you do realize you can have multiple charges at one time in regard to ONE INCIDENT.....don't you? Keep reading those libertarian sites bro....it's really paying off for you. :D
The boy’s disclosures prompted the Virginia State Police to conduct an internal review of Carson, during which they determined that on two separate instances Carson had given pornographic videos to another minor in 2011. However, despite the seriousness of the charges and the seemingly evident pattern of behavior, Carson appears to have been given what amounts to a free pass. - See more at: http://libertywarrior.com/police-of...-days-jail-plea-bargain/#sthash.rvxnvFKb.dpuf Dummy do you not see the highlighted 2011, the charges you used in your argument where from 2001, hence he has current and old charges, the guy a is a serial child predator, even if the 2001 charges where all there was, would becoming a cop wipe clean his past transgressions? if somebody butt raped your 13 year old, and was a legal adult would you feel fine with a 30 day sentence? and yes i know you can have many charges from the same offense, i know more about the criminal justice system then you could dream.
 
can you READ where it says "another" minor, can you read that dummy? where did you find that it was only the case from 2001? on itsokforcopstosodomizekids.com?
 
I'm waiting for the good old.....jack booted thugs....to enter this "conversation". LMAO
 
The boy’s disclosures prompted the Virginia State Police to conduct an internal review of Carson, during which they determined that on two separate instances Carson had given pornographic videos to another minor in 2011
can you not read that?
 
The boy’s disclosures prompted the Virginia State Police to conduct an internal review of Carson, during which they determined that on two separate instances Carson had given pornographic videos to another minor in 2011. However, despite the seriousness of the charges and the seemingly evident pattern of behavior, Carson appears to have been given what amounts to a free pass. - See more at: http://libertywarrior.com/police-of...-days-jail-plea-bargain/#sthash.rvxnvFKb.dpuf Dummy do you not see the highlighted 2011, the charges you used in your argument where from 2001, hence he has current and old charges, the guy a is a serial child predator, even if the 2001 charges where all there was, would becoming a cop wipe clean his past transgressions? if somebody butt raped your 13 year old, and was a legal adult would you feel fine with a 30 day sentence? and yes i know you can have many charges from the same offense, i know more about the criminal justice system then you could dream.

Wait so now you're using the police's own investigation as your basis for your argument? Thought you don't trust the poooleeece? LMFAO what a fucking hypocrite dumbass.


You know about the justice system? You a jail house lawyer? :D
 
Conversation? LMAO What conversation? You can't have a conversation with a closed minded individual such as yourself and Mackin. After about a minute of listening to you in person, I'd just shake my head and drive off, leaving you to continue the verbal intercourse with yourself. :D

Sure you would.
That’s the spirit.
Protect and serve!

D
 
Wait so now you're using the police's own investigation as your basis for your argument? Thought you don't trust the poooleeece? LMFAO what a fucking hypocrite dumbass.


You know about the justice system? You a jail house lawyer? :D
good job ignoring where you where wrong, yeah im a jail house lawyer, good deflection, good job defending a child predator walking the streets with no protections for anybody, if it was your child, what do you think would be fair?
 
Top