2 20psiofevil Active Member Joined Feb 10, 2013 Jan 16, 2019 #21 forcefed3.8's said: Nothing wrong with a 6870 on a healthy v6. Click to expand... I thought I read you were having high back pressure from this turbo at one point. May have been mistaken though.
forcefed3.8's said: Nothing wrong with a 6870 on a healthy v6. Click to expand... I thought I read you were having high back pressure from this turbo at one point. May have been mistaken though.
F forcefed3.8's Buckeye Bullet Joined May 26, 2002 Jan 16, 2019 #22 It still made good power. I have the backpressure under control now.
V6sleeper Turbo Buick's since 1988 TurboBuick.Com Supporter! Joined Jan 18, 2011 Jan 17, 2019 #23 There is way more in it fir shir
434nova Active Member Joined Sep 30, 2013 Jan 17, 2019 #24 forcefed3.8's said: It still made good power. I have the backpressure under control now. Click to expand... How much power did you make with the 6870?
forcefed3.8's said: It still made good power. I have the backpressure under control now. Click to expand... How much power did you make with the 6870?
F forcefed3.8's Buckeye Bullet Joined May 26, 2002 Jan 17, 2019 #25 Enough to trap 151mph, that was with a crappy intercooler. I bet the 6870 wouldnt be too far off from what I run with the 7270. There is still more in the 7270. I would love to test a 6870 again. It spooled way faster than the 7270.
Enough to trap 151mph, that was with a crappy intercooler. I bet the 6870 wouldnt be too far off from what I run with the 7270. There is still more in the 7270. I would love to test a 6870 again. It spooled way faster than the 7270.
toomanymodz Well-Known Member Joined Oct 14, 2009 Feb 2, 2019 #26 I'm saving up for a 6870. By the way, here is a frame-grab from the video. The car launches so straight and smooth. .
I'm saving up for a 6870. By the way, here is a frame-grab from the video. The car launches so straight and smooth. .