From what I've seen, there are 2 ways to allow a wideband to control A/F ratio at WOT. 1) Purchase the TurboTweak 6.0 chip and powerlogger or 2) Go with the Gen 2 MAF translator and Extender chip.
My preference would be to use the GEN 2 translator with the 5.6 TurboTweak chip that I already own. Unfortunately the wide band tracking feature of the GEN 2 translator is not compatable with any other chips aside from the extender chip.
The overall cost would be a little lower with the GEN 2 translator because I already have an LS1 MAF, and it would allow me to sell the 2 stock MAF's that I own to recoup some of the investment. Also, I would need to purchase a laptop if I bought a powerlogger, but I do like the features of the powerlogger aside from enabling wideband control.
So for those that are using either system for wideband control of A/F; what are some of the advantages and disadvantages?.....and have you noticed any performance gains?
My preference would be to use the GEN 2 translator with the 5.6 TurboTweak chip that I already own. Unfortunately the wide band tracking feature of the GEN 2 translator is not compatable with any other chips aside from the extender chip.
The overall cost would be a little lower with the GEN 2 translator because I already have an LS1 MAF, and it would allow me to sell the 2 stock MAF's that I own to recoup some of the investment. Also, I would need to purchase a laptop if I bought a powerlogger, but I do like the features of the powerlogger aside from enabling wideband control.
So for those that are using either system for wideband control of A/F; what are some of the advantages and disadvantages?.....and have you noticed any performance gains?