Go Back   TurboBuick.Com > Tech Arena > Turbo V8 Conversions
Register FAQ Members List Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
View Poll Results: Gen 3 with N2O, Gen 1 with turbo or Gen 1 with procharger?
Gen 3 ls 408 with nitrous 7 24.14%
Gen 1 sbc with XFI & turbo or turbos 21 72.41%
Gen 1 sbc with XFI & procharger 1 3.45%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old July 3rd, 2008, 08:33 PM
m6z's Avatar
m6z m6z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tulsa, OK
Trader Rating: (5)
Posts: 273
LS or Gen 1 Small block?

Looking for ideas & opinions guys. I'm wanting a solid 9 sec. PUMP GAS street/strip car with ac/heat/ps etc. I want to be able to cruise around on pump gas. Race fuel at the track is not a prob. Would like to atleast run in the 10's on 91 octane.



Should I go Iron block hyd. cam 408 ls stroker with a 200 or 300 shot? There are some nice conversion kits with headers out now. The only real fabrication would be the wiring and the ac lines. (Would be using the factory ls ecm)

Or option 2

Dart little m based sbc 400 c.i., 23 deg heads with edelbrock victor efi intake and a fast efi system. If I was to go with the old school sbc I would want to go turbo or turbos. Are there any good prefabbed headers for a swap like this or is it all going to have to be built? Would be staying air to air intercooled. Is 800 rwh possible with a hyd roller? Turbo suggestions?

Or option 3 Same dart based sbc, but with a procharger.

I am wanting to keep this build around 15k and would be shooting for 700-800 hp thats streetable. Really looking for streetable combos. I know a carbed & nitrous solid roller gen 1 would prob. be the easiest, but that not going to be the most streetable option. Like I could drive it to work in the oklahoma heat with the ac on without a problem.

This is the car it will be going in.

White 1987 T-Type with blackout, simmons, and alot more. Must see!
__________________
1987 T-Type - 11.52 @ 119 with a 1.80 60ft - Sold
1998 GMC Sonoma - Hurst equiped. lol.

Looking for a fast car now...

my fquick page: www.fquick.com/m6z

Last edited by m6z : July 3rd, 2008 at 08:42 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old July 3rd, 2008, 11:11 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 314
i would go with the sbc. there is a ton of parts available for sbc.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old July 4th, 2008, 08:53 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Madison, Ga.
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 3,085
Lightbulb My $.02...

The LS technology is light yrs ahead of the SBC stuff.
The new, LSX block is <$2k. The L92 heads are KILLER, right out of the box. And, are <$200 ea, bare.
Add a good crank, rods, pistons, [A must for a 300 shot!], and UR GTG..
Take a look at the Jan 08 issue of Chevy HP. A good back to back comparo of the old school, vs the gen 4 engine. Pretty easy choice, since you mentioned a streeter and 9's.

Using the LS ecm is a BIG improvement over the old GN stuff. We use EFILIVE, and find an absolutely amazing amount of tuning capability in that box...[Take a look, here. http://forum.efilive.com/]
A visit to LS1TECH - Powered by vBulletin, could help w/ your decision. They have a hybrid/conversion forum there.
The DBW feature on the later engines, is nice, too. No throttle linkage. I'd use the 4L80E trans, and have total tuneability of that component, too. [Besides, it'll last longer.]
I'm doing the LS engine system in my 55 Chevy.. A 100% streeter.. Well, almost. A 100 shot may sneak in there, too.
__________________
86 GN
9.98 @ 141.00
www.codymotorsports.com
FUEL INJECTOR SERVICE
706-342-3152

Last edited by Chuck Leeper : July 4th, 2008 at 09:00 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old July 4th, 2008, 10:28 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Leeper View Post
The LS technology is light yrs ahead of the SBC stuff.
The new, LSX block is <$2k. The L92 heads are KILLER, right out of the box. And, are <$200 ea, bare.
Add a good crank, rods, pistons, [A must for a 300 shot!], and UR GTG..
Take a look at the Jan 08 issue of Chevy HP. A good back to back comparo of the old school, vs the gen 4 engine. Pretty easy choice, since you mentioned a streeter and 9's.
everything on a ls motor is based on a sbc. I dont know how u could say LS is light yrs ahead of sbc maybe if it had dohc,vvt,etc .

ive seen sbc in the low 6`s. not bad for old technology
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old July 4th, 2008, 10:34 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Madison, Ga.
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 3,085
Question ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by daverr View Post
everything on a ls motor is based on a sbc. I dont know how u could say LS is light yrs ahead of sbc maybe if it had dohc,vvt,etc .

ive seen sbc in the low 6`s. not bad for old technology
"based on"??
Yep, it has 8 cyls, has in blk cam.
You think GM made all the changes, just to have a new name?? Guess again.
__________________
86 GN
9.98 @ 141.00
www.codymotorsports.com
FUEL INJECTOR SERVICE
706-342-3152
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old July 4th, 2008, 11:01 AM
kingots2004's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: star city,ar
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 470
well ive had both my turbo combo was a 400 cube small block with a small chet herbert blower cam and little m block.had afr 220 heads and a blow-thru carb.in a 3000 pound car on 10.5 tires and 91mm turbo on 18lbs of boost non-intercooled.car went 9.35 at 122 miles per hour lifting early and getting on the brakes.this was in the quarter mile after that pass i was kicked off the track.i also have an 01 chevy truck with a 6.0 ls1 motor on nitrous if i had it to do all over with my car it would have an ls motor.there is a guy with a stock bottom end 6.0 with l92 heads and small turbo setup running 5.85 in an s10 at he said 15lbs of boost.on a STOCK ls motor and drag radials.ls motor all the way
__________________
87 buick turbo t
01 chevy truck with 6.0
04 gsx-r 750 turbocharged-sold
72 vega turbocharged-sold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old July 4th, 2008, 07:13 PM
kenny's Avatar
No turbo, no care.
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 1,325
I still can't believe no one bought your car.

Personally, if you're going to V8 it I would like to see a turbocharged LSx. Nitrous cars are lame IMO.

That said - if I had it, I'd just make the V6 faster.
__________________
87 Turbo-T, stock - for now
87 Turbo-T 440rwhp, 491ft-lbs (sold)
87 Turbo-T 324rwhp, 393ft-lbs (stolen)
Looking for a white or gunmetal W04 hardtop...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old July 4th, 2008, 09:17 PM
What
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: fl
Trader Rating: (4)
Posts: 456
Put a "Ford" motor in it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old July 5th, 2008, 02:28 PM
m6z's Avatar
m6z m6z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tulsa, OK
Trader Rating: (5)
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenny View Post
I still can't believe no one bought your car.

Personally, if you're going to V8 it I would like to see a turbocharged LSx. Nitrous cars are lame IMO.

That said - if I had it, I'd just make the V6 faster.
Turbo would be nice, but I'm not much of a fabricator and paying some one to build a turbo kit would be way out of the budget. Also making the v6 faster, just doesn't make sense money wise. I'd be starting from scratch either way.
__________________
1987 T-Type - 11.52 @ 119 with a 1.80 60ft - Sold
1998 GMC Sonoma - Hurst equiped. lol.

Looking for a fast car now...

my fquick page: www.fquick.com/m6z

Last edited by m6z : July 5th, 2008 at 02:32 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old July 5th, 2008, 02:33 PM
m6z's Avatar
m6z m6z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tulsa, OK
Trader Rating: (5)
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by REBAL T View Post
Put a "Ford" motor in it.

wtf? yeah thats not going to happen.
__________________
1987 T-Type - 11.52 @ 119 with a 1.80 60ft - Sold
1998 GMC Sonoma - Hurst equiped. lol.

Looking for a fast car now...

my fquick page: www.fquick.com/m6z
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old July 6th, 2008, 11:20 AM
Shadow Master
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Breckenridge MN
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 542
I would go with basically exactly what i have. I would not go with a 408 either. Get a good 6.0L with a 2wd 4l80 behind it like i did and you will be so far ahead of the game. Then build a forged 370 using the stock crank and a set of compstar rods and wiseco pistons or the brand of your choice. The stock crank has been to +1400whp in both the ohio boys cars, and they say the 370 will make more power than the 408 to boot.
So you saved $1k by using the stock crank, get a set of L92 heads with good springs and a decent cam. GMPP L92 intake and 65# injectors, Intake elbow with the stock TB. Definately go with a turbo, you can get a 302 SBF header kit and have the LS1 flanges welded on and your turbo kit is pretty much done. Put a 91mm Borg Warner unit on there and you should be able to get 850whp on pump gas pretty easily. I make about 575whp with only 9psi and no intercooler, 89 octane. I also use stock everything including the trans.
Oh, and with the 4l80, just a set of good clutches and a shift kit and converter and your done, no new parts are needed.
Gary
Gary
__________________
87 Buick T-type WE-4,
6.0L LQ4 iron block LSx,
65# injectors, dual walbro 255s
HP Tuners 2-bar Speed Density EMS
224/224-112 cam,
4L80E, Fuddle 3200stall,
BW s475 turbo, 60mm wastegate,
9" rear 31 spline with spool, 3.07:1 gears,
11" rear disks,
TRZ Manual Rack and Pinion
full 4" exhaust with dynomax race bullets
650hp 585ft-lbs(crank)on 89 octane and no intercooler, 9.5psi-12 degrees timing
11.42@119-7psi
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old July 6th, 2008, 08:53 PM
m6z's Avatar
m6z m6z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tulsa, OK
Trader Rating: (5)
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by ITSNOTAGN View Post
I would go with basically exactly what i have. I would not go with a 408 either. Get a good 6.0L with a 2wd 4l80 behind it like i did and you will be so far ahead of the game. Then build a forged 370 using the stock crank and a set of compstar rods and wiseco pistons or the brand of your choice. The stock crank has been to +1400whp in both the ohio boys cars, and they say the 370 will make more power than the 408 to boot.
So you saved $1k by using the stock crank, get a set of L92 heads with good springs and a decent cam. GMPP L92 intake and 65# injectors, Intake elbow with the stock TB. Definately go with a turbo, you can get a 302 SBF header kit and have the LS1 flanges welded on and your turbo kit is pretty much done. Put a 91mm Borg Warner unit on there and you should be able to get 850whp on pump gas pretty easily. I make about 575whp with only 9psi and no intercooler, 89 octane. I also use stock everything including the trans.
Oh, and with the 4l80, just a set of good clutches and a shift kit and converter and your done, no new parts are needed.
Gary
Gary
Ok, thanks for the info. I've spent countless hours on ls1tech here lately... There are a few guys running the l92's with good results and I was planning on using the carb style intake. Which brand/part number headers? Going to be going with a turbo 400 trans with a brake. Not going to try to make a od trans live at 800 rwh.

Do you have any picts of your setup? I'm running a CAS V4 front mount that I was going to try and use on this build. Are you still running ac? That a main concern with this build.

Thanks for the ideas and help. keep them comming.
__________________
1987 T-Type - 11.52 @ 119 with a 1.80 60ft - Sold
1998 GMC Sonoma - Hurst equiped. lol.

Looking for a fast car now...

my fquick page: www.fquick.com/m6z
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old July 6th, 2008, 09:15 PM
m6z's Avatar
m6z m6z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tulsa, OK
Trader Rating: (5)
Posts: 273
Hey ITSNOTAGN I found you forsale thread. Looking through your pictures it doesn't look like the stock location of the ac compressor would work. Are you supporting the turbo with anything other then the headers?

Looks like quite abit of fabrication work. I allready have some 3/8" stainless header flanges. I'm going to be using the bhp mount and crossmember kit. So I will prob. run the f-body or the corvette bracketry. I'm going to be ordering a complete long block from LME or another one of the sponsers on tech.

I'm not much of a fabricator, That's one reason I was thinking of going with the procharger. I'm thinking that the c5 procharger mounting position will work on a g-body. (mounts high on the pass. side)
__________________
1987 T-Type - 11.52 @ 119 with a 1.80 60ft - Sold
1998 GMC Sonoma - Hurst equiped. lol.

Looking for a fast car now...

my fquick page: www.fquick.com/m6z
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old July 6th, 2008, 11:32 PM
87Regal3.8SFI's Avatar
V6 on steroids
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Missouri
Trader Rating: (3)
Posts: 2,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by REBAL T View Post
Put a "Ford" motor in it.
That would just make it slower.
__________________

1987 Regal LC2, hot-wired, Walbro 255 lph fuel pump, blue top injectors, Accufab adjustable fuel pressure regulator, Turbo Tweak chip, GN110T cam, TE-44 turbo, Alkycontrol, 3 inch mandrel bent Dynomax exhaust, Scanmaster, OD lockout detent plate, RJC power plate and RJC boost controller

Quote:
Originally Posted by corsair231 View Post
Build a car to go 11's and detune it to run 12's and you don't have to worry about parts breakage. Build it for 11's and try to push it into the 10's and all bets are off. Of course trying to run a number is fine if that is what you want to do but beware if you walk on the edge sometimes you fall off.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old July 7th, 2008, 01:28 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 1,230
Parish on ls1tech.com built a Ford Fairmont drag car (gutted to 3,200lbs with driver) and installed a stock 5.3 truck motor/TH400 with the only mods being a used Z06 cam (204/218 duration) and better valvesprings with larger injectors. It runs a cheapy MasterPower T70 turbo and stock 5.3/6.0 manifolds flipped forward.
quickest stock ls longblock? this might be it!! - LS1TECH

One hand on the wheel running 9.49@138mph+:
1320Video - The Fairmont's new 1/4 Mile Time

Car-Part.com--Used Auto Parts Market has tons of 5.3 pullout motors for sale
__________________
'87 Mazda RX-7 with '87 GN drivetrain stk turbo/convertor
11.62@114mph R.I.P.
http://www.wrongmotor.com/gallery/mark_c/index.htm.
LS1/T56/RX-7 FD 13" AP brakes, coilovers, 18x10.5 CCW's. 439rwhp/385rwtq 2800lbs/1.13g's 11.42@127.4mph n/a SOLD
http://www.turbobuick.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=195038.
LS7/T56 RX-7 FD project: 575rwhp + 140mph trap speed n/a goal
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old July 7th, 2008, 11:11 AM
Shadow Master
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Breckenridge MN
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 542
As far as the a/c, i am going to make a bracket for it and mount it pretty much where the stock v6 one was. still using the v6 compressor as well. Just have to get that far. I do have the box and evaporator in there and it fits just fine, even with my 4" downpipe. As far as a 4l80, just a set of clutches and it will laugh at 800whp. Being it is just a t-400 with an OD it will take alot of power. There are quite a few cars running 9s with about 3800lbs on just a good rebuild. Also you would be losing all the greatness of the factory PCM with an electronic trans.
With anything this complex its going to be alot of fab work and hassle, thats why i suggest doing it all right away. A procharger would be alot easier and if thats what you want it is a very good idea. Just go right to a F1 with the 370 and L92 heads.
Gary
__________________
87 Buick T-type WE-4,
6.0L LQ4 iron block LSx,
65# injectors, dual walbro 255s
HP Tuners 2-bar Speed Density EMS
224/224-112 cam,
4L80E, Fuddle 3200stall,
BW s475 turbo, 60mm wastegate,
9" rear 31 spline with spool, 3.07:1 gears,
11" rear disks,
TRZ Manual Rack and Pinion
full 4" exhaust with dynomax race bullets
650hp 585ft-lbs(crank)on 89 octane and no intercooler, 9.5psi-12 degrees timing
11.42@119-7psi
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old July 7th, 2008, 03:44 PM
m6z's Avatar
m6z m6z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tulsa, OK
Trader Rating: (5)
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnx7 View Post
Parish on ls1tech.com built a Ford Fairmont drag car (gutted to 3,200lbs with driver) and installed a stock 5.3 truck motor/TH400 with the only mods being a used Z06 cam (204/218 duration) and better valvesprings with larger injectors. It runs a cheapy MasterPower T70 turbo and stock 5.3/6.0 manifolds flipped forward.
quickest stock ls longblock? this might be it!! - LS1TECH

One hand on the wheel running 9.49@138mph+:
1320Video - The Fairmont's new 1/4 Mile Time

Car-Part.com--Used Auto Parts Market has tons of 5.3 pullout motors for sale
Yeah that car runs very very well for the money spent. Though I know my luck and if I tried somthing like that I'd be picking up parts off the track every time I went. lol.
__________________
1987 T-Type - 11.52 @ 119 with a 1.80 60ft - Sold
1998 GMC Sonoma - Hurst equiped. lol.

Looking for a fast car now...

my fquick page: www.fquick.com/m6z
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old July 7th, 2008, 03:49 PM
m6z's Avatar
m6z m6z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tulsa, OK
Trader Rating: (5)
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by ITSNOTAGN View Post
As far as the a/c, i am going to make a bracket for it and mount it pretty much where the stock v6 one was. still using the v6 compressor as well. Just have to get that far. I do have the box and evaporator in there and it fits just fine, even with my 4" downpipe. As far as a 4l80, just a set of clutches and it will laugh at 800whp. Being it is just a t-400 with an OD it will take alot of power. There are quite a few cars running 9s with about 3800lbs on just a good rebuild. Also you would be losing all the greatness of the factory PCM with an electronic trans.
With anything this complex its going to be alot of fab work and hassle, thats why i suggest doing it all right away. A procharger would be alot easier and if thats what you want it is a very good idea. Just go right to a F1 with the 370 and L92 heads.
Gary
Ok, I see what you mean. If you reuse you