Go Back   TurboBuick.Com > Tech Arena > Turbo V8 Conversions
Register FAQ Members List Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old November 7th, 2007, 12:49 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Janesville WI
Trader Rating: (3)
Posts: 473
Which LSx motor to use?

Well I'm strongly thinking of a Twin Turbo LSX for the GN this winter and wanna know what everyone thinks is the best canidate for this conversion. I cant keep all these LS motors str8, since there seems to be a dozen of em, LS1, LS2,LS6,LS7, heard about one which was an iron block that came in the trucks?( is this a iron headed motor to) Seems there's so many which one should I start with? Keep in mind my GN is a TRUE DAILY DRIVEN street car from March thru November. My goals are 700-800rwhp when I'm done which seems fairly obtainable with what Ive seen others doing.

So which LS? motor should I use for a base? Something that wont require a ton or any internals for my goals?
__________________
87 GN- BB GT6776, 65# inj, 62mm TB & Plenum, RJC Power Plate, ADFPR, Comp 212/212 Flat tappet, Stock Ported and Polished Irons and Intake Gasket matched, THDP, Dump Pipe /w Electric Cut Out, Hooker 2 1/2 Dual Exhaust, Pats 10" 3200 Stall, dual air bags, boxed lowers, Hot Wired 340, Maft PRO /w PRO Chip, LM1 Wide Band, Custom FMIC, Tach,Oil, Water, Audible Knock& Gauge, Scanmaster 2.1, Translator, Razors Alky, Direct Scan Ram Charger Fans, ect. ect....
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old November 7th, 2007, 07:21 AM
Looking for 11s...
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Falkner, MS
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 264
I'd recommend a 6.0L out of a truck. Look for an LQ4 or an LQ9...either would be a good baseline. The earlier models did have cast iron heads, but all of the later stuff came with good aluminum heads. For 700rwhp, you could use the stock crank, with good rods and pistons and even stock or mildly ported stock heads, just crank up the boost. Good Luck!
__________________
87 Limited with just a few bolt-ons
Coming Soon: Gray 86 T-type with Turbo LS1
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old November 7th, 2007, 08:44 AM
NothinYet's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: burbs of Chicago, IL
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 784
id say LQ9 over LQ4, just my 2 cents...

Then again, if you are made of money, buy an LS7... already has a forged crank, titanium rods, etc, but you would need to lower the compression a ton. (pistons)

Gm has already tested the LS7 with lower compression with a supercharger... made stupid amounts of power... Doesnt take as much boost to make tons of power, has much larger displacement then the rest of the LSx motors!

I dont honestly think an LQ9 will get you to your goals without tapping into the bottom end... 650-700HP is PUSHING it.

Again, just my 2 cents...
__________________
1985 Monte Carlo SS - 87 GN engine, Jimmy's 200r4Transmission Vigilante 3200 stall 9.5" converter.
Bone stock engine, stock turbo, 60 lb HIGH Z injectors. 3" Full Throttle Downpipe, 16 row Front Mount Intercooler, No cats, Dynomax Race mufflers, MSD plug wires, external walbro fuel pump , fuel cell and larger fuel lines, 3" cold air kit with 9" K&N Cone filter, accufab adjustable fuel press reg, MAFT Pro w/ innovative LC1, razors alky control.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old November 7th, 2007, 01:29 PM
Shadow Master
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Breckenridge MN
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 547
i would pick any one of them. Unless you go LS7 ($$$) you will need pistons and rods anyway. i would personally go with a LS2 alum block, with a camaro or vette accesory drive, the truck accessories dont fit with stock steering components.
Otherwise go for a LQ4 (what i have) and a 4l80e combo from a 3/4 ton pickup. Its low compression, 9.4:1, and you shouldnt have to do much to the trans to make it hold that. Plus get HP Tuners or EFILive to control the engine and trans. I was getting about 570-600whp out of mine without an intercooler, nothing but a cam.
Gary
__________________
87 Buick T-type WE-4,
6.0L LQ4 iron block LSx,
65# injectors, dual walbro 255s
HP Tuners 2-bar Speed Density EMS
224/224-112 cam,
4L80E, Fuddle 3200stall,
BW s475 turbo, 60mm wastegate,
9" rear 31 spline with spool, 3.07:1 gears,
11" rear disks,
TRZ Manual Rack and Pinion
full 4" exhaust with dynomax race bullets
650hp 585ft-lbs(crank)on 89 octane and no intercooler, 9.5psi-12 degrees timing
11.42@119-7psi
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old November 7th, 2007, 02:48 PM
johnplogii's Avatar
Senior citizen
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nebraska
Trader Rating: (3)
Posts: 725
I have a 6.0L iron motor for sale for $650
__________________
87 gnX clone, girdled 109, j & e's, ported stock heads, atr headers, THDP, te67, 60lb mototrons, precision FMIC and a 2004r trans by Brian. ET 10.16 at 132.21 mph 1.45 60ft.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old November 7th, 2007, 09:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Akron, OH
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 1,230
Well, how crazy do you want to get? I have mine all layed out. Will go in a buick regal not a GN but here is my paperd combo

GM's new LSX block.

Forged Stroker crank

I beam rods

Forged pistons at about 8.5 - 9 : 1

Iron heads from a truck

Mild Cam

427 ci

Turboed.

4l80E

Should be fun.
__________________
86 gn Stock Block and heads. 210/205 cam, 70mm TB , CASV4R, TE60, THDP with dump, MM BOOSTCMND, Poston Headers, BFGDR 275 50 15, Direct Scan. Only has two speeds with wife driving, Idle and HOLY MOTHER OF GOD!!

86 GN TTop daily driver. K&N, 17" 009's Centerline wheels some dings runs great. Faster than your average Honda
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old November 7th, 2007, 11:01 PM
Shadow Master
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Breckenridge MN
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 547
why on earth would you use iron heads? the aluminum heads are >50lbs lighter and are the same if not better casting. And if you want to argue about deck strength, you have no argument. With studs 317 castings have been known to hold 18-20psi without pushing water. And a 427+18psi would be pretty much uncontrollable, like 1200rwhp or more.
Gary
__________________
87 Buick T-type WE-4,
6.0L LQ4 iron block LSx,
65# injectors, dual walbro 255s
HP Tuners 2-bar Speed Density EMS
224/224-112 cam,
4L80E, Fuddle 3200stall,
BW s475 turbo, 60mm wastegate,
9" rear 31 spline with spool, 3.07:1 gears,
11" rear disks,
TRZ Manual Rack and Pinion
full 4" exhaust with dynomax race bullets
650hp 585ft-lbs(crank)on 89 octane and no intercooler, 9.5psi-12 degrees timing
11.42@119-7psi
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old November 7th, 2007, 11:41 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 233
Definitely select the LS7. I’ve got a Lingenfelter twin turbo in my C6 Z06 making 700 hp at the wheels on pump gas and no alky – yes it is stupid fast. The package includes ball bearing turbos, rods, pistons, balance & blueprint fuel system upgrades and a duel 4” exhaust. The motor is capable of 1000 crank hp. The red one the net was done the same time as mine. The difference if the manifold and 16 injector set-up. Since it runs the stock cam it is very streetable – until you step into it.
YouTube - Lingenfelter C6 ZO6 1000 HP Twin Turbo Corvette Chassis Dyno
__________________
Stroker GNX
Twin Turbo C6 Z06
Tweaked WS6 TA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old December 13th, 2007, 08:11 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Allentown, PA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 246
The LS1, LS2, and LS6 are basically the same. The LS2 and LS6 have the better heads. The LS2 has the cam from the 01 Z06's (LS6) and the cam sensor was moved to the front of the motor, other than that and LS2 is an LS1. The LS7 has the forged components, but they sell for about $13,000. You can get an LS6 for 3-4K. My buddy had twins on his LS6, with stock heads and put down over 1000HP. He had to tune it down to race, it ran low 8's hundreds of times. The LS7 uses the dry sump, I'm not sure you want to mess with that, but thats your choice.
Let us know what you decide...
__________________
2003 Z06
ECS/Paxton Custom SC600 Novi2000 with Forced Induction Cam/Meth Kit
RPM level V
American Racing Headers
595 RWHP and 510 RWTQ
9's.....
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old December 13th, 2007, 10:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vett-Klr View Post
The LS1, LS2, and LS6 are basically the same. The LS2 and LS6 have the better heads. The LS2 has the cam from the 01 Z06's (LS6) and the cam sensor was moved to the front of the motor, other than that and LS2 is an LS1. The LS7 has the forged components, but they sell for about $13,000. You can get an LS6 for 3-4K. My buddy had twins on his LS6, with stock heads and put down over 1000HP. He had to tune it down to race, it ran low 8's hundreds of times. The LS7 uses the dry sump, I'm not sure you want to mess with that, but thats your choice.
Let us know what you decide...
Not true the ls2 is a 6.0l and the ls1 as well as the ls6 are 5.7l.
You should go to ls1tech.com because your getting bad info.
If your on a budget go with the lq9 as it has dished (about 9.2 to 1 CR) pistons and great boost heads. Stay away from lq4 as it has flat top pistons (about 10.5 to 1 CR). The ls2 is the same as the lq4 except aluminum. LSx = aluminum, LQx = iron.

If your able to spend more money and want a bullet proof setup, To meet your goals go to scoggin dickey performance center and buy a forged 402 6.0l LS based stroker short block and stock (317) 6.0l heads or a 408 LQ based 6.0l iron stroker short block and 317 heads.

Please do your own research first but IMO you'll easily hit your goals and reasonably cheap. And if you go with the stroker short block you can easily do it with a single turbo or even a procharger.

I have a N/A ls1(5.7l) stock unopened bottom end making 465 rwhp with heads and cam and of course bolt ons. after Xmas I'll be doing a magnusson roots style S/Charger with only 6#s of boost and should be, from my research close to 625 rwhp. On pump gas no less!

Thanks for listening and PM me if you have any other ?s
Doug
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old December 15th, 2007, 11:54 AM
rking's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: St. Louis and Puxico Missouri
Trader Rating: (12)
Posts: 873
Here you go, start researching!

Forced Induction - LS1TECH

Your goals are very reachable on a stock LSx/LQx, however, that amount of power on stock rods and pistons for a long time would make me nervous! But I understand costs, just know that rods and pistons WILL be needed in the future, the cranks are of no worries, they're awesome in these things.

Personally, I prefer the LSx's that have the 4" bore, ie. your LS2, LS3, L92, LQ4, LQ9. The heads for this bore are so much better, and very affordable.

If you're worried about weight in the already massive GN, go with aluminum, if not go with iron. At your goals, either will work, however, iron will be cheaper

If you want to spend the cash, listen to Doug on the shortblocks, and consider some of the LS3/L92 heads.

I wouldn't even consider a LS7, theres just no point to spend that kind of money.

Just my $.02
__________________
Cory King

87 GN - TT 402 LSX has officially begun
87 Turbo T
87 Turbo T
55 Chev LS1 4 Speed
71 Nova 396 4 Speed FOR SALE
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old December 15th, 2007, 12:14 PM
NothinYet's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: burbs of Chicago, IL
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 784
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosewood T-Type View Post
Not true the ls2 is a 6.0l and the ls1 as well as the ls6 are 5.7l.
You should go to ls1tech.com because your getting bad info.
If your on a budget go with the lq9 as it has dished (about 9.2 to 1 CR) pistons and great boost heads. Stay away from lq4 as it has flat top pistons (about 10.5 to 1 CR). The ls2 is the same as the lq4 except aluminum. LSx = aluminum, LQx = iron.

If your able to spend more money and want a bullet proof setup, To meet your goals go to scoggin dickey performance center and buy a forged 402 6.0l LS based stroker short block and stock (317) 6.0l heads or a 408 LQ based 6.0l iron stroker short block and 317 heads.

Please do your own research first but IMO you'll easily hit your goals and reasonably cheap. And if you go with the stroker short block you can easily do it with a single turbo or even a procharger.

I have a N/A ls1(5.7l) stock unopened bottom end making 465 rwhp with heads and cam and of course bolt ons. after Xmas I'll be doing a magnusson roots style S/Charger with only 6#s of boost and should be, from my research close to 625 rwhp. On pump gas no less!

Thanks for listening and PM me if you have any other ?s
Doug
Whats that? Scrotum Dick performance! LOL!

(sorry, I had to.)
__________________
1985 Monte Carlo SS - 87 GN engine, Jimmy's 200r4Transmission Vigilante 3200 stall 9.5" converter.
Bone stock engine, stock turbo, 60 lb HIGH Z injectors. 3" Full Throttle Downpipe, 16 row Front Mount Intercooler, No cats, Dynomax Race mufflers, MSD plug wires, external walbro fuel pump , fuel cell and larger fuel lines, 3" cold air kit with 9" K&N Cone filter, accufab adjustable fuel press reg, MAFT Pro w/ innovative LC1, razors alky control.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old December 15th, 2007, 12:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by rking View Post
Here you go, start researching!

Forced Induction - LS1TECH

Your goals are very reachable on a stock LSx/LQx, however, that amount of power on stock rods and pistons for a long time would make me nervous! But I understand costs, just know that rods and pistons WILL be needed in the future, the cranks are of no worries, they're awesome in these things.

Personally, I prefer the LSx's that have the 4" bore, ie. your LS2, LS3, L92, LQ4, LQ9. The heads for this bore are so much better, and very affordable.

If you're worried about weight in the already massive GN, go with aluminum, if not go with iron. At your goals, either will work, however, iron will be cheaper

If you want to spend the cash, listen to Doug on the shortblocks, and consider some of the LS3/L92 heads.

I wouldn't even consider a LS7, theres just no point to spend that kind of money.

Just my $.02
I agree with most of that except for the l92 heads. They are great for n/a but lack the exhaust flow for forced induction. The out of the box 317 heads are a much better (money wise) choice. Plus you can use the truck intake manifold with these heads. The l92s require a l76 intake and ls2 style T/body.
Doug
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old December 16th, 2007, 11:14 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by NothinYet View Post
id say LQ9 over LQ4, just my 2 cents...

Then again, if you are made of money, buy an LS7... already has a forged crank, titanium rods, etc, but you would need to lower the compression a ton. (pistons)

Gm has already tested the LS7 with lower compression with a supercharger... made stupid amounts of power... Doesnt take as much boost to make tons of power, has much larger displacement then the rest of the LSx motors!

I dont honestly think an LQ9 will get you to your goals without tapping into the bottom end... 650-700HP is PUSHING it.

Again, just my 2 cents...
lq4 if your not wanting to change pistons
lq4=9.4:1
lq9=10.2:1
these are factory numbers
these motors are identical except the pistons, same heads, etc, etc, etc
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosewood T-Type View Post
I agree with most of that except for the l92 heads. They are great for n/a but lack the exhaust flow for forced induction. The out of the box 317 heads are a much better (money wise) choice. Plus you can use the truck intake manifold with these heads. The l92s require a l76 intake and ls2 style T/body.
Doug
if you have a custom cam made the l92 heads would be fine, but the intake for the l92 heads run out of steam at 6k. you could always go with a carb intake and run a custom elbow to keep the fuel inj.
__________________
06 2500 duramax crew-cab duramax 4x4 tow b--ch
05 2500 suburban 4x4 8.1l back-up tow b--ch 10 mpg, but its mean
04 nissan frontier (gas mileage king for me!)
98 t/a just a little 94mm w/ a billet wheel
04 gto stock
86 gn not stock
00 z28 stock for now
94 z28 stock
00 tacoma dana 60 front 14-bolt rear, 39.5 iroks, marlin crawler doubler.....its been rolled once or .................................................. .......20 times
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old December 16th, 2007, 11:41 PM
rking's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: St. Louis and Puxico Missouri
Trader Rating: (12)
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosewood T-Type View Post
I agree with most of that except for the l92 heads. They are great for n/a but lack the exhaust flow for forced induction. The out of the box 317 heads are a much better (money wise) choice. Plus you can use the truck intake manifold with these heads. The l92s require a l76 intake and ls2 style T/body.
Doug

Very true. I sometimes forget about those things since I do my own port work .

For his goals, and that many cubic inches, they would still do the job very easily. Some people are getting great results with them. Also, on the intake side, Weiand has a great one coming out for those heads pretty soon IIRC.
__________________
Cory King

87 GN - TT 402 LSX has officially begun
87 Turbo T
87 Turbo T
55 Chev LS1 4 Speed
71 Nova 396 4 Speed FOR SALE
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
85 GN motor for sale/trade for repair of old 3.8 carb motor andrewrock5 Hot Air (non-intercooled) Tech 4 November 27th, 2005 05:18 PM
Swapping 87 motor for 85 Gn motor :want advice new2boost General Turbo Buick Tech 9 December 13th, 2003 01:56 PM
pulling motor or not to pull the motor? ulose2av6 General Turbo Buick Tech 2 November 23rd, 2003 01:09 PM
just got back a motor from machine shop- MOTOR IS TOOOO TIGHT Quick6'n'-K.C. General Turbo Buick Tech 13 September 2nd, 2002 11:44 PM
Need suggestions on a cam for my motor...motor specs inside... FJM568 General Turbo Buick Tech 15 April 5th, 2002 03:54 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
One of the largest message boards on the web !