![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Be careful on the exhaust side it is going to be very easy to choke that sized motor with the hp requirement.
__________________
John Wilde 86 T Type Blue - Driver 86 T Type Black - Resting 87 GN Back Halved - Sold |
|
||||
|
Reply
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Your right, it is a crate motor. I was thinking of spraying it for the other 200hp but I hate the thought of refilling the bottles. My thoughts were to turbo it and run low boost for a couple of years and then breaker back down and build it right for the boost. Then I would have the setup (headers, plumbing, and gremlin) all worked out. I realize compression and cam are not ideal for a turbo but I seen LS1 running boost with reasonable success with similiar compression and cams. Thank for the comments Chuck |
|
||||
|
Hey Chuck,
Is this going on a certain aluminum block that my father and I got a chance to look at .If so, then .Anyhow, I am building a Twin Turbo LSx with ported L92s. At only 402 cubic inches, I am going to be running 2 GTQ72s with around a 1.00 on the exhaust side just to keep it from choking itself. Now with a 454, to let it breathe you are going to have to run some pretty strong turbos, however, with your horsepower goals, you wont need any boost hardly, and thus be way out of the effeciency of that size of turbo. Some may say its not feasible, and why do it.... But I understand the appeal and because its just so dang ....I have never built a TT 454, so I'm not an expert. I guess you could look at Nelson Racing Engines, I know he has some TT 454's, but they are more in the 2000+ horsepower range. Here's an idea and question for anyone, would he be able to try something like 2 GTQ70s with huge exhaust housings? I would believe that those, on only 5lbs of boost, would be around his goals, if they dont choke down the engine!
__________________
Cory King 87 GN - TT 402 LSX has officially begun 87 Turbo T 87 Turbo T 55 Chev LS1 4 Speed 71 Nova 396 4 Speed FOR SALE |
|
||||
|
Hi Cory,
You got it! I have been side tracked and not getting much done on the vette but the 63 impala is coming along pretty good. It should be into paint the end of the month. We hoping to take it to phoenix in November if things go well. The engine from the GN end up with a stroker kit, ta alum. heads ported , roller cam, and 6pack fogger kit. It's backed up by the 200r4 and a 9". Went with the air ride suspension, and wilwood brakes. Here's a link for you: 65cpe's photos and albums on webshots A for the vette, since I won't have her done till spring I thought I might spend a little more money on her. I would love a whipple supercharger but they are get hard to find for a BBC. I was thinking on 1.26 on the exhaust side. Chuck |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Actually I have been running turbos for years, my first turbo was a 1978 Kawasaki Z1R TC motorcycle (factory experiemental bike). In 1979 I had it down into the 8.90's which was fast back then. My first turbo car was a 1982 Camaro- 400 smallblock with a gale banks carb turbo setup, bordix alum heads, venolia blower pistons, and ran 10.9's but the plumbing was a nightmare. Took 2-3 hrs to change the plugs. In 86 I bought my 1st GN. I loved it. In Nebraska they had me in a M class with an index of 14.8 if I remember right. Everyone hated it, I could leave with no boost and still beat anyone by over a 1/2 second. Have owned 6 GN's, 1 Turbo Camaro, and 5 Z1RTC. The bikes started with 10:1 compression from the factory and ran 6-8lbs of boost on a carb. With alky injection I could run 12lb easily on pump gas. The bikes were a drawthrough system and carb. Actually had to run a fuel pump as it would run out of gas in 3rd gear. We ended up running blower pistions, welding the crank (pressed cranks), porting head, and other little tweaks. Dynoed 268hp at rear wheels. I have been burning GN chips for local guys for years so I have an idea on engine mangement (alway can learn more). As for weight, you are right. I have an all alum. engine and the turbos will be locate just above the pan and back next to the firewall. I have wonder what the results could be with a single turbo running off one side of exhaust? Any thoughts? Thanks Chuck |
|
|||
|
You can pull it off with that compression, C-16 and conservative timing. If you buy too large of a turbo and have to turn the boost way down it's gonna surge. I'd be scared of 10.2 with much boost at all on pump gas.
See if you can pick up a pair of 4 bolt turbo's in the 64-67mm range. Rking...check on the L92 heads. A friend spoke with a well known LS1 shop in Texas a couple weeks back about an LSX block and L92 heads with a 91mm for a street car. They did not like the decks on the L92's and advised against them for boost.
__________________
PTC Converter Distributor Twisted 6 Racing Fastest of the fastest Freeman, Fiscus, Kereny...who's next Cruz, White, Ted A...the list of record holders keeps growing 85 Regal w/ turbo SBC 4.96 @ 149.....3520# 94mm and 325's Best 1/4 pass 7.77 @ 181 |
|
||||
|
One of the LSX websites had pics of a sectioned L92 head. Some parts of the decks are really thin. But they are a steal.Maybe with low boost it should work.
__________________
http://community.webshots.com/user/10secv6 ![]() 1987 Buick Grand National Dart 400ci SBC, PTE106,PTE 2000 liquid IC, ,PTC Powerglide and converter,FAST XFI Dyno Tune by Cal Hartline 1989 Pontiac TTA |
|
||||
|
Dusty and Louie,
I appreciate it. Yeah, I have been spending hours on LS1tech.com just reading over stuff for the past year or so. I have a 6.0 liter iron block, Lunati internals, but only the L92s as of now. The intention is to get everything together, plumbed, then switch to the LSX block and the LSX 6 bolt heads when they are released. The block and internals have proven to be 1000+ RWHP capable, the heads however have been noted to have a thin deck for forced induction. The ET and AFR heads are much better suited with a thicker deck, but why spend the money on a 4 bolt head that can still result in pushed water and lifting, when the LSX head has finally been given a release date. I know that it will take me at least the winter to get everything done, and give the head time to released. As for the L92s not being good for forced induction, probably, but if I get a chance, I am going to push them to see what they really can do, and give my report!
__________________
Cory King 87 GN - TT 402 LSX has officially begun 87 Turbo T 87 Turbo T 55 Chev LS1 4 Speed 71 Nova 396 4 Speed FOR SALE |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Im sure that the L92 heads will work well with forced induction. Its just that you are goona have to be sensible with the boost. I heard that the guys from Hardcore were using Yamabond on their head gaskets to help retention. Might be a little trick to use. But again if boost numbers are kept reasonnable you should not need all that glue either.
I have looked at the numbers for those ET heads . Those things are pretty awesome.
__________________
http://community.webshots.com/user/10secv6 ![]() 1987 Buick Grand National Dart 400ci SBC, PTE106,PTE 2000 liquid IC, ,PTC Powerglide and converter,FAST XFI Dyno Tune by Cal Hartline 1989 Pontiac TTA |
|
|||
|
Chuck, looking at all the specs you listed in your first post, and running through the calculation that I detailed in this article on the Turbo Regal website:
Turbocharger Compressor Calculations (link to the spreadsheet I use is down at the bottom, so you can go through the same math pretty easily) I get a maximum air flow of about 40-42 lb/hr (for 1 of 2 turbos) and a pressure ratio of about 1.8. Looking through the Garrett catalog it looks like a pair of GT3076R's would suit you really well. That is assuming that you have enough restraint to keep the boost down under 10 psi. I also made some allowance for the fact that you live at altitude, and the possibility of water/alky injection. I'm not sure what the equivalent turbo is in standard GN nomenclature; ie what that relates to in the TA/TE/GT sizes. Or in the Turbonetics sizes for that matter. But it shouldn't be too tough to figure that out. I'd guess you would end up with around 700ish hp from that setup, plus or minus 50ish depending on the all the details. Looks like the 60 lb injectors will be perfectly matched for the setup you described. Understand that none of this is to say that your plan is a good plan, it's just answering the question you initially asked - what size turbo for that setup. It's going to be a little different than what most guys have experience with, since you are looking at low boost. Seems like most guys are looking for the flow at 25+ psi, but you need the flow at something a lot less than that. That changes up the size turbo you need. John |
|
|||
|
WHoa, thats a no-go on the gt3076. those things are VERY tiny. think stock GN size here. Of your trying to keep costs down, i would do dual 66-67mm with a p trim and 1.1 housings. those should spool up to 8-10psi by around 2500rpm, that would be a sick street car, with 700+ft/lbs from 2500 and up. but being an alum block, i would think you would want to spin it up to 6500-7000rpm right? if thats the case i would most certainly go with a set of 70gtq's with a .96 housing. this is really the perfect turbo for your goals, with spool by about 3000, and enough to push your motor to 1200hp easily. also with that big cam and good heads, i wouldnt be scared of running 5psi on it in the least. that should do 700hp sooo easy, and a good 750ft/lbs. Good luck and keep asking questions
Gary
__________________
87 Buick T-type WE-4, 6.0L LQ4 iron block LSx, 65# injectors, dual walbro 255s HP Tuners 2-bar Speed Density EMS 224/224-112 cam, 4L80E, Fuddle 3200stall, BW s475 turbo, 60mm wastegate, 9" rear 31 spline with spool, 3.07:1 gears, 11" rear disks, TRZ Manual Rack and Pinion full 4" exhaust with dynomax race bullets 650hp 585ft-lbs(crank)on 89 octane and no intercooler, 9.5psi-12 degrees timing 11.42@119-7psi |
|
|||
|
I have to disagree. With what he stated - 6200 rpm, 454, 5-8 psi - a pair of GN stockish type turbos is exactly what he needs. Stock GN turbos fed 231 cid pretty well at stock boost levels. A pair should feed 2X that (ie 454 cid) well - especially at the low boost levels he's talking about. The conditions he listed call for about 1150 cfm or so of compressor capacity. A pair of 1200 cfm turbos like your recommendation is way too much. I would be very worried about it performing well down low. Now maybe the best answer is to jump up a size over that GT3076, but I wouldn't go too far out. Unless he wants to buy 'em once, and be prepared for the future when he does want to crank up the boost. That changes everything.
John |