Go Back   TurboBuick.Com > Tech Arena > Turbo Trans Am Tech
Register FAQ Members List Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old July 6th, 2003, 10:46 PM
Signal 1 J-12
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Paola, Kansas
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 2,186
Rear pinion angle???

I have a TTA that makes ~480 RWHP and need to know what pinion angle you all use that offers the best all around traction on the track without binding the U joints? I launch off of a T brake at ~10-15 psi and use MT street ET's in case you need to know.
I was under the TTA today and noticed that when I installed and set my Spohn adjustable torque arm, I must have had a brain fart and set the negative angle at 1/2º. The destructions that came with the torque arm said to use 2º-3º for a "faster" TTA. Would you all agree with these numbers? I ended up setting mine for 2.5º negative angle to play it safe. I rarely street drive my car and have no need for perfect "on road" longevity, so that's not an issue here. Any opinions will be greatly appreciated. TIA
__________________
Joe Reif Jr. Paola, Kansas
2008 Can-Am Renegade 800 CVT beast
2007 Harley Davidson Road King FLHPI SE 103"
2005 Chevy Silverado 3500...Bombed Oil Burner
1987 Turbo-T...light blue exterior/dark blue interior 84k miles
Chip programming by: Eric Marshall @ www.turbotweak.com
Meth injection by: www.alkycontrol.com
My email:pdq6cyl@midwest-connections.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old July 7th, 2003, 01:07 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chi-Town
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 131
trial and error man
__________________
89 IROC-Z
Twin Turbos
F.A.S.T.
GOT BOOST?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old July 7th, 2003, 04:48 AM
Buick "RICER"
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Andover, Ma
Trader Rating: (14)
Posts: 6,512
I would put it to whatever the stock set up was... havin a brain fade now... gone 1.3's with a stock set up!!!
__________________
Dan
don't run your mouth if you cant run your car



86/87 GN and 89 TTA .. tons of parts !! Time to get out! Stuff has to go !!! Otherwise I am cutting it up and throwing it away email ttastage2@yahoo.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old July 7th, 2003, 06:58 AM
Signal 1 J-12
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Paola, Kansas
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 2,186
Stock angle is/was 0º total and that's about what mine was at untill yesterday. Thing about 0º angle is that when I launch hard off the T brake, the angle ends up in the positive area which is not good for anything let alone ET's. I think the reason these recommend 2º-3º negative for higher HP motors is that the driveline/suspension is under that much more "twist" over that of a stock HP motor....makes a lot of sense to me. Years ago I built a 1978 Ford P/U with 44" mud grips on it. With the motor and the lift, I had to set the pinion angle to extreme negative angle to offset the twist imposed by the motor and the weight of those tires. I would only get about 200 miles to a set of extreme duty U joints beofre they would start making noise of just break...kinda the same idea here. Anyhow, anyone else have an opinion???
__________________
Joe Reif Jr. Paola, Kansas
2008 Can-Am Renegade 800 CVT beast
2007 Harley Davidson Road King FLHPI SE 103"
2005 Chevy Silverado 3500...Bombed Oil Burner
1987 Turbo-T...light blue exterior/dark blue interior 84k miles
Chip programming by: Eric Marshall @ www.turbotweak.com
Meth injection by: www.alkycontrol.com
My email:pdq6cyl@midwest-connections.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old July 7th, 2003, 08:39 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 135
2 to 3 is fine. You can go as much as 4 if you like. The more pinion angle the slower the car is to pitch rotate. My car used to like 2.5 with the random tech arm.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old July 7th, 2003, 09:50 PM
Signal 1 J-12
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Paola, Kansas
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 2,186
Ok...thanks Rob. BTW, what are the disadvantages/advantages of a quicker pitch rotation?
__________________
Joe Reif Jr. Paola, Kansas
2008 Can-Am Renegade 800 CVT beast
2007 Harley Davidson Road King FLHPI SE 103"
2005 Chevy Silverado 3500...Bombed Oil Burner
1987 Turbo-T...light blue exterior/dark blue interior 84k miles
Chip programming by: Eric Marshall @ www.turbotweak.com
Meth injection by: www.alkycontrol.com
My email:pdq6cyl@midwest-connections.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old July 8th, 2003, 09:00 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 135
Basically the more pinion angle the slower the car picks the front up. Picking the front up is good for weight transfer, but slower reaction times and 60 foot. You want the car to transfer weight and move forward.

I recommend writing down the settings and running the car a couple of weekend each tuning the chassis in. Leave the boost alone so you can evaluate the suspension.

Robert
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old July 8th, 2003, 10:16 PM
Signal 1 J-12
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Paola, Kansas
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 2,186
I plan to do just that, thanks for the response.
__________________
Joe Reif Jr. Paola, Kansas
2008 Can-Am Renegade 800 CVT beast
2007 Harley Davidson Road King FLHPI SE 103"
2005 Chevy Silverado 3500...Bombed Oil Burner
1987 Turbo-T...light blue exterior/dark blue interior 84k miles
Chip programming by: Eric Marshall @ www.turbotweak.com
Meth injection by: www.alkycontrol.com
My email:pdq6cyl@midwest-connections.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old July 9th, 2003, 08:17 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Madison, Ga.
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 3,321
Question Pinion angle??

Quote:
Originally posted by RobCrisafulli
Basically the more pinion angle the slower the car picks the front up. Picking the front up is good for weight transfer, but slower reaction times and 60 foot. You want the car to transfer weight and move forward.
Robert
Robert, would you please explain how the pinion angle setting affects the speed of pitch rotation?? I guess there's something I'm missing in my understanding of suspension operation w/ the various designs out there.

TIA,
__________________
86 GN
9.98 @ 141.00
www.codymotorsports.com
FUEL INJECTOR SERVICE
706-342-3152
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old July 10th, 2003, 11:23 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 135
Chuck,

I would recommend getting the Chassis book by Dave Morgan. I think jegs has it. I think that is the correct name and author. Good book.

Robert
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old October 17th, 2003, 12:26 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Lake Stevens, WA.
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 54
Pinion Angle

The ideal setting for the TT/A is 2° neg. for drag racing
and 0° for the street. In RSE competition, you change the
setting. When you set your angle to 2°, reset it afterwards
back to 0 and count the turns on the nut to get it there, that way
you can make the changes without the angle finder if needed. The 2° setting that has been discovered to be optimum comes from Joe Cobson. If memory serves, he told me this back when
he was running 9's.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
One of the largest message boards on the web !