Go Back   TurboBuick.Com > Tech Arena > Turbo Trans Am Tech
Register FAQ Members List Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old November 26th, 2001, 11:38 PM
Four-Four-Two
 
Posts: n/a
TTA vs GN

I was just wondering what TTA owners opinions were as far as how they like their TTA, as opposed to a GN. Or visa versa. I am very familiar with G- bodies, but I have never driven a 3rd gen F-body. Just curious what people think.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old November 27th, 2001, 08:41 AM
Hi-psi's Avatar
Got Boost??
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: GA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 338
Turbo Regals are deceptively fast. They sit higher up than a TTA so they don't really feel fast. As for the TTA being low to the ground, you really get a sense of the speed. Obviously the Regal is going to be more comfortable, but you'll have to let off when you come up to that off-ramp........in the TTA you just stay in the throttle, turn the wheel and let that WS6 suspension do the work. I drive the Turbo T daily b/c it's more comfortable and have the TTA to play with on the weekends.
__________________
Robert
'87 Buick Turbo T R.I.P.
318rwhp / 476rwtq
'89 Pontiac Turbo TA
4.1L, T-70, 224/224, 9/11 convertor
'00 F250 4x4 PSD
Got Torque?
www.Hi-psi.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old November 27th, 2001, 06:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wichita Kansas
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 248
The Gn are more recognizable!! and they are more comfortable, but OVERALL performance goes to the TTA "HANDS DOWN".

And they make lots of parts for 3rd gen F bodies.
__________________
Phil
Wichita Kansas
1988 Cougar XR7
1991 Mustang LX Coupe.
1993 Lightning (red)
1995 Lightning (white)
2003 Volvo S60
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old November 27th, 2001, 07:56 PM
quick85
 
Posts: n/a
gn/tta

yes, but the tta thinks its a truck! at least it rides like one! imho
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old November 27th, 2001, 11:04 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wichita Kansas
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 248
Re: gn/tta

Quote:
Originally posted by quick85
yes, but the tta thinks its a truck! at least it rides like one! imho
Apparently you dont know what sports cars ride like!!!
__________________
Phil
Wichita Kansas
1988 Cougar XR7
1991 Mustang LX Coupe.
1993 Lightning (red)
1995 Lightning (white)
2003 Volvo S60
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old November 27th, 2001, 11:12 PM
Four-Four-Two
 
Posts: n/a
riding like a truck

I drive an '85 S-10 as a winter driver, so I guess it will be nothing new to get used to.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old November 28th, 2001, 05:46 AM
Audiowizard's Avatar
CARE FOR A SMOKE ANYONE?
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wichita Falls, Tx
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 1,115
Thumbs up

I like them both . I was at Thunder Valley Buick verse Ford shootout and even though there were only 3 TTAs, they where running some impressive time slips.

I noticed quick85s response about the TTA riding like a truck, well it is a sports car which are designed for handling so you will give up some of the soft ride for that purpose. If you think the ride is bad in a TTA then you would hate my Corvette . But then again it will take a turn at 1 G with no problem .
__________________
1986 Buick Grandnational

MODS: 17" x 8" Billit Centerline "Champ 800's" wrapped in 225/45 Nitto 450s, Bell Tech 2" dropped front spindles, High flow cat/dual 2.5" diameter mandrel bent pipes and Flowmaster Delta Flows with dumps in front of rear axle, '87 GN grille, Polished aluminum mass air flow pipe with K&N on a 150,000 plus mile stock unopened motor.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old November 28th, 2001, 01:29 PM
TTA89
 
Posts: n/a
The TTAs handle like a normal F-body does, Its a jarring ride with sqeaks and rattles but its fun

I LOVE the way the buicks drive, just riding in the passenger seat you can feel how much more smooth they are. I think they are a nicer driving car as well BUT the TTA has more potential than a Regal.

The TTA is a weekend car, wouldnt be fun to daily drive.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old November 28th, 2001, 06:27 PM
Four-Four-Two
 
Posts: n/a
floating

Do the TTA's have that "floating feeling" like the G's do? I've noticed in G body's that when you are under heavy acceleration and you are going on anything but a perfectly flat surface that if kinda feels like you are floating. I don't really like it, seems kinda scarry to me like I'm not actually in control.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old November 29th, 2001, 12:37 AM
1BADDAM's Avatar
Venomous Snake Handler
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Temecula. CA.
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 572
Been in a GN at around 140 and TTA at 140 mph. GN floaties, TTA no floaties.
__________________
Frank

TTA#1416
11.78 @ 117 1.86 60'
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old November 29th, 2001, 09:02 AM
bruce's Avatar
Rest In Peace
 
Join Date: May 2001
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 9,537
Quote:
Originally posted by 1BADDAM
Been in a GN at around 140 and TTA at 140 mph. GN floaties, TTA no floaties.
I've been in properly set up ones at those speeds, and they both are stable, just takes more HP to get the GN up there.

FBod does take work to get stable, chassis wise. Morrison coil over front end, and Adam Reese bar rear end to get em right.
Figure a grand to get the FBod suspension right, and probably the same for the GN.

The GN can be made to handle as well as a TTA. The McPherson strut in the TTA is lousy compared to the GN with the B Car spindles.

Sides it's fun to take a few pals along to have some laughs <G>
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old November 29th, 2001, 05:14 PM
dhause
 
Posts: n/a
I basically agree with TTA89s comments. The TTA squeaks and rattles a lot to me, something I do not care for all that much. Plus, the GN is much smoother in every way. But the TTA's performance (assuming both are stock) is quite a bit better in my opinion.

I bought a 94 Firebird Formula (LT1 6 speed with T-tops) and found that car to be 1000% better in the ride quality/no squeaks and rattles dept than the 3rd gen Fbody.

Both have their pluses and minuses. I love those form-fitting TTA seats, and hate the junky GN ones. Overall, I'd take the GN though, especially if I drive it much at all.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old November 29th, 2001, 07:20 PM
Snake Killer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bristol,TN
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 147
If your looking for weekend car with good braking,decent handling,and a sporty look get the TTA.If you have a family and intend to drive it every day buy the GN.Expect to put some money into the GN to get similar handling and braking from it.I bought my TTA because it was sporty,was a Indy pace car,anniversary edition, and had a lower prodution number.I wanted to buy something that I felt may increase in value as the years went by and or atleast hold some of it's value as the miles went on.Not saying the GN wont but hoping the TTA will.Cars are lowsy investments I know. Just don't want lose any more than I have to.
__________________
WES
#1361 T-tops Leather SOLD!
Missing my TTA already. 8-(
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old November 29th, 2001, 11:55 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago suburbs
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 454
Put a set of subframe connectors on. Got rid of almost all the rattles in my TTA.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
One of the largest message boards on the web !