Go Back   TurboBuick.Com > Tech Arena > Turbo Trans Am Tech
Register FAQ Members List Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old November 7th, 2001, 02:18 PM
Hi-psi's Avatar
Got Boost??
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: GA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 338
TTA vs GN head comparison.

Tooks some pics of a TR head and a TTA head from the same angle so as to see the differences, and possible more efficient TTA design. Notice on the TTA head how the spark plug is angled towards the intake valve. Also notice the non-round shape of the TTA bowls. This means more head deck surface which may lead to a less likelyness of a TTA headed motor to blow head gaskets. Thoughts?


TR head:

http://hi-psi.netfirms.com/stuff/41motor4.jpg

TTA head:

http://hi-psi.netfirms.com/stuff/ttahead.jpg
__________________
Robert
'87 Buick Turbo T R.I.P.
318rwhp / 476rwtq
'89 Pontiac Turbo TA
4.1L, T-70, 224/224, 9/11 convertor
'00 F250 4x4 PSD
Got Torque?
www.Hi-psi.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old November 8th, 2001, 05:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 135
To see the real difference you should take some pics of the exhaust ports. The TTA flows better on the exhaust out of the box because the exhaust port is cut back furter into the head as compared to the GN head.

But this a disadvantage in the long run. The material removed means the head has less meat to help hold the head down under boost. This is why the TTA heads tends to push the head gasket out at the bottom of #3 and #4.

Also, the open chamber of the TTA head is better more volume the more air/fuel you can pack in.

Champion recently add more meat in the exhaust area on the GN1 heads. The more metal the less the head will give and lift. There 4-5 pounds heaver and their aluminum!!

I ran 30-32 psi in my TTA even with no knock, the head will lift and the gasket will erode from exhaust gases passing by it. Then its only a matter of time before it blows.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old November 12th, 2001, 09:37 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FL.
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally posted by RobCrisafulli
To see the real difference you should take some pics of the exhaust ports. The TTA flows better on the exhaust out of the box because the exhaust port is cut back furter into the head as compared to the GN head.

But this a disadvantage in the long run. The material removed means the head has less meat to help hold the head down under boost. This is why the TTA heads tends to push the head gasket out at the bottom of #3 and #4.

Also, the open chamber of the TTA head is better more volume the more air/fuel you can pack in.

Champion recently add more meat in the exhaust area on the GN1 heads. The more metal the less the head will give and lift. There 4-5 pounds heaver and their aluminum!!

I ran 30-32 psi in my TTA even with no knock, the head will lift and the gasket will erode from exhaust gases passing by it. Then its only a matter of time before it blows.
Rob-
Can anything be done in the way of better gaskets for stock ported TTA Heads?
Thanks,
Jeff
__________________
89 TTA Best of Both Worlds
87 GN http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Speedway/1780/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old November 12th, 2001, 10:31 AM
Hi-psi's Avatar
Got Boost??
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: GA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 338
Quote:
Originally posted by RobCrisafulli
the head will lift and the gasket will erode from exhaust gases passing by it. Then its only a matter of time before it blows.
Wouldn't some of the heavy duty ARP bolts, or studding the block help to keep this from happening?
__________________
Robert
'87 Buick Turbo T R.I.P.
318rwhp / 476rwtq
'89 Pontiac Turbo TA
4.1L, T-70, 224/224, 9/11 convertor
'00 F250 4x4 PSD
Got Torque?
www.Hi-psi.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old November 12th, 2001, 11:03 AM
bruce's Avatar
Rest In Peace
 
Join Date: May 2001
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 9,537
Quote:
Originally posted by RobCrisafulli

Also, the open chamber of the TTA head is better more volume the more air/fuel you can pack in.
Actually that is a disadvantage.
The larger surface area allows for mor eheat to be transferred to the coolins system rather then recovering that energy to moving the piston.

All things being equal a smaller chamber is a better *thing*.

Using a relief in the piston under the plug area, maintains the same quench area in either case, but allows for mor heat enrgy to be recovered to moving the piston. If in doubt about putting too much heat into the piston in this design, a barrier coating and water injection would help

An interesting experiment would be surfacing the head to reduce the chamber size so the head wasn't as thermally loaded and see how the gasket sealing problem changes.

Also, all the iron heads need the chambers smoothed out to reduce detonation. Long term trace and tipin detonation will take it's toll
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old November 13th, 2001, 09:25 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 135
I would recommend head studs, but you need to clearence the headers and change to small headed ARP stainless 12 point bolt for the headers. You need to mockup this up on the engine stand. It a slight mod, but required. If you do not want to do this good ARP head bolts is second best.

As far as head gaskets and my brother and I have run them all (no kidding here). I like to run a 14bolt head gasket because the gasket has more material on the bottom and resists blowing more for this reason. I would not worry about running big bore gaskets on small or stock bore motors. I guess my favorite gasket is the Victor 14bolt for a Stage motor. Next would be the Felpro 1000. Although, at high boost this gasket will wafer and tends to get air bubles under it after the head lifts and exhaust gas eats at it. I am not into lock wires.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old November 13th, 2001, 11:10 AM
Hi-psi's Avatar
Got Boost??
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: GA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 338
Well the 4.1 I'm putting together had alread been studded. It's a .030 over bore. I'm planning to run the Felpro 1000's. I'm not planning on running any mad boost. Probably no more than 25psi.
__________________
Robert
'87 Buick Turbo T R.I.P.
318rwhp / 476rwtq
'89 Pontiac Turbo TA
4.1L, T-70, 224/224, 9/11 convertor
'00 F250 4x4 PSD
Got Torque?
www.Hi-psi.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old January 13th, 2002, 01:19 AM
TTA89
 
Posts: n/a
Rob just curious what your car runs and how much boost do you run?

Thanks
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old January 13th, 2002, 06:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 135
Which Rob?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old January 13th, 2002, 06:54 PM
TTA89
 
Posts: n/a
You Rob C
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old January 13th, 2002, 07:58 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 135
Sadly, my first TTA has not run in years now. I used to run it in the NSCA EFI class. It has been sitting in the garage with a bare Stage II 4.1 into for a long time now. I have started to work on it again and hope to have it running by the end of the summer if I can ever stop playing with my other turbo cars.

The original TTA build up was Ruggles 210/205 cam, big valve fully ported and polished heads, pot matched intake, adjustable push rods, stock rocker arms, stock bore, stock pistions, arp main studs and head studs, port and probed headers, arp rod bolts, 72 pounders, TA63/ptrim, PTE.63 housing, TH dp, 2800 multidisk lockup, built 2004R, bank to bank felpro, MJ 17 row IC, Currie 9", 3.40 gears, ATR exhaust, denny's driveshaft.

The EFI class was an indexed, power to weight factoring. We had to weight 3650 for the 11.75 class. You could run no more than 1 second under your index so 10.75 was the fasted we could go. My car was built to run 10-40's - 10.50's on super kill 30 psi, VP C16 only. We used to run 11.0's @128 with 24/25 psi, 1.7's 60 foot in the EFI class. If you go to close to the index they refactor you and slow you down. I have a picture of the car yanking the front gatorback off the ground, no trans brake, 2800 stall converter.

The converter started taking a dump shortly after that, wonder why and the intake started leaking oil into number 6 hole so we were done racing for the year. Even with the converter dumping I would put 30 psi on it and it would run 131-132 mph.

I am actually finish up a similar build up on my festival car, it got a lot of the parts off the first car. These cars are a lot of fun.

Robert Crisafulli
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old January 19th, 2002, 03:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 712
Rob,I was wondering if you have found more or less where the limit is for TTA heads holding boost and not lifting enough to erode the gasket?Also how many runs,on average,could you get out of a set of gaskets running 30#'s of boost?

I'm starting to think I should take a pair of headgaskets and a torque wrench with me to the track

Steve

BTW I put my motor together with the 1000's
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old January 22nd, 2002, 09:29 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 135
You can run low 11's and have a car that last for years, running every weekend at the track. Typically this would be 500-525 hp, good gas C16 and no knock. 20-23 psi. Boost depends on cam and turbo size.

Now you want to go 10's. Now you need 550-600hp. So you crank up the boost to 25-30 psi. If you have a lighter car that 60 foots good, you can go 10's with less hp. If you have a heavy car you need more hp.

My brother and I would change the head gaskets on our motors every winter. Run the car during the racing season and freshen up over the winter. First, we think nothing of changing the head gaskets on a motor. We do all the work our selves so its not a problem for us. Second you learn a lot by tearing down the motor. You may find oil system problems, port mismatches, wiping cams, etc. If you run any National events, it sucks driving 12 hours to blow a gasket during the racing season. I think its better to be prepared.

If you want to make your motor live the longest, do it a favor by making the car as light as you can, work on 60 foot so you get the best ET for the hp the car makes and tune the car carefully. Go at it easy sneak up on higher boost levels. Read the spark plugs they will tell you everything you need to know. If you are running 27 or more psi, I would change the head gaskets every year and keep and eye on the inside of the motor.

Robert
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old April 14th, 2008, 10:54 PM
BandAid's Avatar
B P U +++
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Trader Rating: (2)
Posts: 2,907
some good info from yrs ago...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old April 15th, 2008, 10:57 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 315
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobCrisafulli View Post
Also, the open chamber of the TTA head is better more volume the more air/fuel you can pack in.
TTA heads are NOT open chamber heads. They are closed, heart shaped chambers. They are also smaller CC than GN heads.
__________________
.020" Diamond pistons, Ported heads (206I/196E cfm) comp. 212/212 cam, 9.1:1 compression. Turbonetics 66BB, Modified BGC 23 row interooler. Razor's alcohol kit. Turbo tweak chip.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
One of the largest message boards on the web !