![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
well, you cant go wrong with a yamaha. my buddy used to have 1. they are a bit small and arent that great in the snow but still a lot of fun.
![]()
__________________
87 turbo t, new engine 40 over,delphi 50s,jim testa chip, ta 60 ,esp front mount, dynotech trans, protorque 10 inch converter, terry houston down pipe, 2 and a half hooker exhaust, ported plenum,power plate , ,champion ported irons and ported intake, razors progressive alky, best et{11.688 at 117 0n pump gas } |
|
||||
|
ok machine but they are small ...wont be very comfy if you go for any long trail rides
__________________
85ttype 87 powered (resting) , 78 elcamino turblo bruick powered Eastern Virginia Turbo Buicks From Stock To Stage All Types of Buick Repairs Or Mods business is closed ... relocating to jax. florida soon
|
|
|||
|
i have one that i used to ride a few hours every day. i'm 6' 140 lbs and never had a complaint about the size. i liked the smaller size, it was a lot easier to throw around than bigger quads. i also had a honda 400ex for a while, and i really did like the blaster much more. it wasn't as fast but the power band felt stronger, i think its just 2 vs. 4 stroke.
if i were getting another i'd look at an older honda or suzuki 250, there cheaper run better, just allaround better than a blaster is. it really depends on what you want to do though. with enough pratice a blaster will do pretty much anything you want it to do. i didn't have any problem climbing very steap or rocky hills, its GOOD at every thing, but not great at anything. and a pipe and set of reeds ($250 total) will have it screaming. the only real weakness they have is their suspension. i don't know if that has been fixed yet or now (mine is a 98) they do cost more, but look at the polaris 2 stokes. scrambler 400, xplorer 250 older 300, and 400 and the trail blazer. if i could get another it would be the scrambler 400 4x4.
__________________
87 turbo T. its just a big, heavy, v6 with a little turbo on it. sold... i miss it! 99 regal gs supercharged- daily driver, rice killer. Sold it. 06 cobalt, have to deal with $3+ a gallon for gas somehow. 38mpg cessna 172, taking all my money. "stupid ricers, wings are for airplanes." |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I see a 02 blaster for 1800 in the paper, not bad?
__________________
Glen 1986 GN- Garage Art. ![]()
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
87 turbo T. its just a big, heavy, v6 with a little turbo on it. sold... i miss it! 99 regal gs supercharged- daily driver, rice killer. Sold it. 06 cobalt, have to deal with $3+ a gallon for gas somehow. 38mpg cessna 172, taking all my money. "stupid ricers, wings are for airplanes." |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|