Go Back   TurboBuick.Com > Marketplace > Stolen Buick Information Exchange/VIN Check
Register FAQ Members List Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old June 2nd, 2008, 06:23 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 12
Can CARFAX be wrong? Grievance??

Last month I was going to purchase an 87 Buick Grand National with 56,000 original miles on it from the second owner. VIN # 1G4GJ1177HP439319. When the carfax was run on the vehicle, it only had one odometer reading from one state DOMV at 127,000 miles. The owner felt that this was wrong was going to file a grievance against CARFAX. Has anybody heard of them being wrong in the past? I feel bad for the guy if he is being truthful as he might of bought the car feeling that it was a low mileage vehicle or perhaps it is a low mileage car with a bad odometer reading on carfax report.

We were going to make a deal at 13,000 which is great for a 56 K car but for a 156,00 perhaps a little high. He is confident of the mileage he says that it is and won't move from 13,000. Car has a 5 year old paint, new carpeting, headliner, and some minor rust under the doors, other wise all original.

I regret not buying but should a guy just walk away from the car and keep looking? I wont post the guys name but here are a couple photos without anything identifiable to him.
Attached Images
    
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old June 2nd, 2008, 10:50 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 12
I just found a related link and have found numerous responses that indicate that Carfax and the Dept. Motor Vehicles can be wrong, and have been wrong on numerous vehicle reports.

It's a great looking car and I'll take the owners word on the mileage.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old June 3rd, 2008, 10:37 AM
Still plays with cars!
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ca
Trader Rating: (4)
Posts: 1,834
carfax is WAY WRONG !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I purchased a car ( expensive) and did carfax, and got carfax insurance,
later found out car had been sotlen, and in accidents, I told carfax,and filed for replacement value with them, there reply was sorry , your not covered, and sue us if you don't like it!
I warn every one I can that carfax is a fraud.
there is a class action lawsuit against them , and yes I am part of it.

ask your 5yr old neighbor for car history before you ask carfax!! you'll be better off.
__________________
just a bunch of cars..
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old June 3rd, 2008, 10:42 AM
excobraguy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 674
Yes, carfax can be wrong and the DMV can be wrong. Mileage reporting on cars is a joke and yet it stays with the title forever.........and if an owner accidentally checks the box "Mileage is beyond mechanical limits"........good luck trying to get this one fixed. The DMV won't budge on it, at least in missouri. And also, Carfax only reports what is reported to carfax......if I own my own bodyshop, total my car out, repair it and then sell it........this was never reported to carfax so it won't show up. I'm amazed sometimes how people believe everything is reported to carfax!
__________________
87 GN
Revolution X roller cam, RJC girdle, PT6152E, VPE Stage 3 Heads, 3200 ProTorque TC,Built 200r4 for 700hp, TurboTweak Alky Chip, THDP, 65lb Inj, FMIC, ATR 3" Dual Crossflow, Kirban front/seat braces, Bilsteins, UMI UCA/LCA, Trans/LT1, Big Mouth CAI, RJC Boost Cont., RJC DSOP, DS poly Mount.

I asked a ref one time if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad thoughts about him...he said no, I said "Well I think you stink!" and then he gave me a technical, you can't trust 'em......
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old June 6th, 2008, 07:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Jersey
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 617
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polecat View Post
Last month I was going to purchase an 87 Buick Grand National with 56,000 original miles on it from the second owner. VIN # 1G4GJ1177HP439319. When the carfax was run on the vehicle, it only had one odometer reading from one state DOMV at 127,000 miles. The owner felt that this was wrong was going to file a grievance against CARFAX. Has anybody heard of them being wrong in the past? I feel bad for the guy if he is being truthful as he might of bought the car feeling that it was a low mileage vehicle or perhaps it is a low mileage car with a bad odometer reading on carfax report.

We were going to make a deal at 13,000 which is great for a 56 K car but for a 156,00 perhaps a little high. He is confident of the mileage he says that it is and won't move from 13,000. Car has a 5 year old paint, new carpeting, headliner, and some minor rust under the doors, other wise all original.

I regret not buying but should a guy just walk away from the car and keep looking? I wont post the guys name but here are a couple photos without anything identifiable to him.
A 13k car should look like New !!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old June 7th, 2008, 04:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 221
CARFAX is only one step in checking the background of a car. One of my '87s does not exist in the CARFAX database...

***CARFAX report says no records exist for this vehicle, but I have plenty of records going back to the original application for title when 12 miles were on the odometer.***
__________________
'87 GN T-Tops and all stock - a garage queen
NOS LC2 and LM9 engines decorating the shop

Current project...
'87 GN build-up for a stealthy street prowler...
currently working on the mill

Last edited by Anthony P : June 7th, 2008 at 04:44 PM. Reason: additional details of report
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old June 7th, 2008, 10:34 PM
87Regal3.8SFI's Avatar
V6 on steroids
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Missouri
Trader Rating: (3)
Posts: 2,507
Carfax only shows what is reported on a vehicle. If your car was ever wrecked but not reported by the cops or you to insurance, Carfax will not show it. Spend your $24 elsewhere.
__________________

1987 Regal LC2, hot-wired, Walbro 255 lph fuel pump, blue top injectors, Accufab adjustable fuel pressure regulator, Turbo Tweak chip, GN110T cam, TE-44 turbo, Alkycontrol, 3 inch mandrel bent Dynomax exhaust, Scanmaster, OD lockout detent plate, RJC power plate and RJC boost controller

Quote:
Originally Posted by corsair231 View Post
Build a car to go 11's and detune it to run 12's and you don't have to worry about parts breakage. Build it for 11's and try to push it into the 10's and all bets are off. Of course trying to run a number is fine if that is what you want to do but beware if you walk on the edge sometimes you fall off.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old June 8th, 2008, 06:43 AM
Pronto's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nashua, NH
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 3,687
It's a guide but not an absolute answer to if the car has issues. Don't base 100% of your decision on it. The ones I have have had for my cars were accurate but then I knew about the cars history anyway and was doing the report for yucks.
__________________
87 TurboT--GT6131, 60lb injectors, Precision sl intercooler, Hooker cat back exhaust, THDP, home made Big Mouth, pp, 62mm tb, adj fr, Walbro 340/hotwire, AlkyControl kit, Turbo Tweak 93+alky chip, HR lower control arms, air bags, ATR bar, best et 11.79@113.86
http://s64.photobucket.com/albums/h1...secondpass.flv
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old June 8th, 2008, 03:44 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rochelle IL
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 318
you can get free VIN checks from insurance companies. they will usually use more then one source to check vehicle history as well.
might not always be 100% accurate either but its another route to take.
__________________
Steve G.
hybrid in the works '90 mustang notchback (true BUFORD?? )
ET too be decided
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old June 10th, 2008, 09:22 AM
hottrawd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dumas, Tx.
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 172
your really screwed in tx if you title a vehicle in TX, if it is 20 years old or older they mark the mileage as beyond mechanical limits no matter if you have proof of mileage or not. So both of my GN's that have under 70,000 miles are now screwed.
__________________
84 gn my first GN 68,900 stock.
87 gn stock except for unknown blue and pink chip. 14.61@95 mph spining 20 year old gatorbacks into 2nd gear.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old June 10th, 2008, 03:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ROCKY POINT, NY
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 133
I'm an insurance adjuster and sometimes if i look at a car that is locked or can not get the mileage, I used to estimate miles based on the year of a car, I do not do this now because any damage to a car over 1500.00 in new york gets reported to the state dmv, so if i have mileage thats not accurate , it can be posted on car fax that the car has higher miles or lower in some cases. Thats were car fax gets there info from.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old June 10th, 2008, 04:17 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Jersey
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 617
Quote:
Originally Posted by hottrawd View Post
your really screwed in tx if you title a vehicle in TX, if it is 20 years old or older they mark the mileage as beyond mechanical limits no matter if you have proof of mileage or not. So both of my GN's that have under 70,000 miles are now screwed.
That's not right.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old June 15th, 2008, 10:19 AM
gn.87's Avatar
No More 5.0
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 169
Reply to HOTTRAWD... Beyond mechanical limits in Florida is a branded title. What we have here in Florida is any car 10 years or older gets a "exempt" on the title unless we state otherwise "actual miles". I just titled a 12 year old car and did not fill out the mileage on the title. The DMV put exempt in my behalf. The car only had 26k original miles. Pissed! Branded titles are not good news.
__________________
60lb Injectors, Vigilante 9.5" billet converter, Walbro 340 Fuel Pump, 60lb injectors, Razor's alky, 6152 turbo (jet hot coated) on a low mile 87 GN with original paint.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old June 15th, 2008, 07:36 PM
19TTA89's Avatar
I know 8sec Pete!!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Central,N.J.
Trader Rating: (4)
Posts: 1,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by hottrawd View Post
your really screwed in tx if you title a vehicle in TX, if it is 20 years old or older they mark the mileage as beyond mechanical limits no matter if you have proof of mileage or not. So both of my GN's that have under 70,000 miles are now screwed.
I recently bought a car from an older Gentleman in TX,He brought the car to a garage to get the inspection done,It seems the yahoo from the garage took the Mileage from the tripometer rather than the odometer...(Digital dash car)..So the mileage went from 42k to 2700 in one year.

Obviously carfax doesn't want to know anything about it,And the Guy I got the car from never even thought they took the mileage because of the age of the car.

So,I have an original 46k mile car that has a spot on the carfax,And even though the carfax states that it could be a clerical error,They want nothing to do with making it right.

__________________
87 GN..Sold.

89 TTA#934..Gone!

87 Turbo T..45K Mile Lt.Chestnut Beauty.

Shawn...magna pot stirrer!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old June 15th, 2008, 08:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Jersey
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 617
Carfax

The problem is not with car fax it's with the yahoo who did the Inspection
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old June 15th, 2008, 08:21 PM
19TTA89's Avatar
I know 8sec Pete!!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Central,N.J.
Trader Rating: (4)
Posts: 1,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnxjames548 View Post
The problem is not with car fax it's with the yahoo who did the Inspection
Originally...yes,But when there contacted,And don't want to hear anything about it in order to get it resolved...Then I put the blame on them.

carfax sucks.
__________________
87 GN..Sold.

89 TTA#934..Gone!

87 Turbo T..45K Mile Lt.Chestnut Beauty.

Shawn...magna pot stirrer!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old June 15th, 2008, 08:24 PM
19TTA89's Avatar
I know 8sec Pete!!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Central,N.J.
Trader Rating: (4)
Posts: 1,145
Im not worried about it for my car...If I put it up for sale,There would be no question that it is a low mile car.
__________________
87 GN..Sold.

89 TTA#934..Gone!

87 Turbo T..45K Mile Lt.Chestnut Beauty.

Shawn...magna pot stirrer!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tell me I'm wrong or not... NCTURBOS Engine Tech 8 April 2nd, 2008 07:47 AM
Liberals: Wrong, wrong and wrong again TT/A1233 Political Views 78 March 26th, 2005 04:07 AM
always the wrong place at the wrong time saleen01 Turbo Lounge 3 October 23rd, 2004 09:33 PM
What if Carfax is wrong? JadeMonkeyStang Turbo Lounge 20 August 19th, 2003 08:39 AM
where carfax is wrong arista5 Turbo Lounge 11 May 14th, 2003 10:40 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
One of the largest message boards on the web !