![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
From a performance stand point, the BHJ should provide better bearing/crank life. The stock balancer (actually it's only a hub and not a balancer) might cause you issues with tech guys at the track. (though, my local division tech director stated that if it doen not have an inertia ring with a sandwitched elastomer it is not considered a balancer and does not need to be SFI.) The BMS hub falls into the same catigory as the stock balancer, though it is made from steel and is much stronger. The stock balancers are known to crack. (which is also another readon to replace it with the BHJ.) An ATI balancer is considered the best balancer on the market, but would require some fabrication to make work on a EFI Buick V6. The BHJ balancers also have timing issues with the interruptor rings. Check the timing carefully.
__________________
Ken B. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Balancer | Russ Merritt | Parts wanted | 2 | February 18th, 2005 07:12 PM |
| B-H-J Balancer. | 9SECVSIX | Stage II Tech | 4 | July 28th, 2004 07:25 AM |
| Balancer same as GN? | mrtransam3 | Turbo Trans Am Tech | 2 | January 22nd, 2004 11:14 PM |
| Bms Hub (balancer)! | BigChinooks | Stage II Tech | 2 | October 4th, 2003 10:32 AM |
| balancer | John Mason | Stage II Tech | 4 | November 27th, 2002 09:07 PM |