![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Australian Turbo V6 rear wheel drive
heres my car not sure if its in the right spot aiming at 200-240rkw on high and low boost
its a buick 231 same as what comes from the front wheel drive buick powered cars from around 1990 with a turbo hydromatic gear box behind it the car weights 1311 kgs no idea in pounds lol its got acl pistons at 9.5.1 comp, prep'd rods mild cam heads log manifolds t3/t4 turbo(garrett) 32lbs injectors, 600x300x75 intercooler. my question is what do people in the states no about our cars lol they dont come factory turbo and the usa is kinda where all the cool stuff comes from what do standard regal turbo bottem ends standard up too? horse power and psi? are the parts very cheap? im talking pistons/rods compare to what i have in my engine which is better the stock the regal turbo pistons look kick ass any info u guess could give me would be great thanks heres some pics |
|
|||
|
heres some more pictures the standard bottom ends in these arnt very strong just a cast piston with 8.5.1 the max boost people run in to the is about 10-12 psi with a good tune, although people have run 14psi i cant see it lasting.
they arnt cross bolted mains just two bolts the later version the "ecotec" has weaker pistons and rods but stronger main caps better flowing heads and manifold, the engine in my car was sourced from a buick rettea? something like that little front wheel drive car, and the later ecotecs from something else we also get the supercharger m90 version. the rear axel is a 5 link two upper trailing arms two lower and a panhard rod to keep it centered, with 28 spline axels and open center or lsd option from factory, mine has a mini aka locker, locked diff, its illegal here but who cares lol the trasmission is a turbo hydrmatic 700-R aka T-700R, T-700, which is was basiclay used from 1988 to around 2006 i guess with slight revisions my model car also came out with a holden 5L v8 304ci in it which have been the enmey of my car since iv had it in now well and truely kills them ![]() |
|
||||
|
more info and pictures
it looks a little like the corsica.
__________________
1968 LC2 Powered Chevelle Boost gauge Scanmaster TT 93 Chip K&N cone filter Dutt neck OE IC Stock rebuilt Turbo Adjustable actuator Adjustable FP reg. 340M Hot Wired RJC Power Plate 200-4R built by Earlys D5 with heavy duty bearing 2.5 Exhaust worst time a 17.99 backed up by a 17.91 1966 Mustang all Original, Rebuilt Engine, Fresh paint, lots of new parts pictures by request (For sale) 1987 Turbo Regal - http://www.turbobuick.com/forums/car...rbo-regal.html |
|
|||
|
cheers guys
its called a holden commodore everyone one over here does them up but not so much the v6's the model before the vl had an inle 3.0L nissain turbo which everyone loves and my model coming out with the v8 means that most choose that path, ill up load some more pics tomra it is a sleeper, better to be that way with the laws we have in our state get caught doing anything naughty u lose the car for 48 hours and end up in court, it weights about 1311kg stock, has 15" rims on it 6-7" wide umm dunno what else to tell you? our later model cars 1996 onward some come out with the supercharged motor they go well very well but the cars are quite heavy so yeah, breaks traction at 40km untill about 70km, on 9psi with a small turbo very very poor tune, and no full throttle. should be good im guessing for a low 14 atm with better sized turbo more boost and tune should do high 12's yeah anything u want to know i can tell you and any pics just ask theres heaps of forums about our cars just look on google street commodores forum its the biggest one |
|
||||
|
Did you use the factory 3800 flywheel/flexplate? What torque converter did you use?
Did you have any problems with the starter hitting the transmission? What computer are you running?
__________________
Love putting Buick engines where they don't belong. Love taking chevy engines out from where they don't belong. |
|
|||
|
the series 2 3800 can take 400+ whp (298 wkw) without breaking open the motor. i believe the head gasket lets go around 20 psi.
series 3 sc rods (L32) and diamond forged pistons are used with 700+ bhp (521 kw) builds. use arp rod bolts, head and main studs. 1311 kg = 2889 lb. that's seriously light for a midsized car...esp with 240 kw ( 322 whp). zzp's base t04e-50 turbo kit is good for ~300 whp (223 wkw) without intercooler. with 6 psi, a 1600 kg regal runs high 13 second quarter. you'd be low 13s. ZZ Performance
__________________
1999 Buick Regal GS stock for now. |
|
||||
|
I'm pretty sure that it's a series 1. That engine looks identical to the one in my 88 Bonneville. Even the intake and valve covers. Mine had the Magnavox coil pack. This one is using the coil packs from my 91 Toronado but with the intake from the older car. Since it's in Australia, I have no idea for sure...
__________________
Love putting Buick engines where they don't belong. Love taking chevy engines out from where they don't belong. Last edited by KrisW : July 30th, 2007 at 03:51 PM. |
|
|||
|
you're right...it is a series 1. i'm looking at a series 2 cylinder head right now. i was just reporting hp levels.
the series 1 probably shares more parts with the 231 than the series 2/3 motors. do you have an LN3 or L27? either one is very close to the 231. Buick V6 engine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia follow the gn guys for combos. any buick engine can easily take 300+ whp. you're already making 127 kw (not including mods), so 15 psi will get you 185 - 213 kw (depending on your intercooler and octane). i'd add 20% for the mods. you seem set to reach your goals (and then some). you didn't mention the turbo trim. fyi, 1 kw = 1.34 hp 1 kg = 2.2 lb
__________________
1999 Buick Regal GS stock for now. |
|
||||
|
Looks good! I would suggest checking out some of the Grand Prix forums for some information on what they are using for the series 2 motor in their car (they call it the L67 like we call ours the LC2).
__________________
1987 Buick GN - Lots of stuff, 11.51 @ 117 MPH 1.76 60' on Nittos! No cage so no 10 second timeslip... for now. 2001 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP Special Edition - It has a pulley and a lot of KR which is not my fault! 14.66 @ 98 MPH with a crap 60' <~~ WebmasterWant your transmission built right? Call the master BGN Registry #BGN00858C |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Send me an e-mail with the GTOs set up... You must like Duttweiler's driver. =)
__________________
John Wilde 86 T Type Blue - Driver 86 T Type Black - Resting 87 GN Back Halved - Sold |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 400 hp 400 ft lbs Rear wheel drive Buick Concept | turbo nasty | Turbo Lounge | 13 | April 9th, 2004 10:14 AM |
| Question about 4-wheel drive...is it REALLY 4x4? | d0n_3d | Turbo Lounge | 11 | December 11th, 2003 05:47 PM |
| 4 Wheel Drive GNX? | Rick | Turbo Lounge | 1 | November 21st, 2003 03:29 PM |
| Do you really need four wheel drive for winter... | AsphaltAnihil8r | Turbo Lounge | 13 | October 9th, 2003 06:23 PM |
| Australian guy needing help about buick | adz | General Turbo Buick Tech | 7 | April 3rd, 2003 02:37 AM |