Go Back   TurboBuick.Com > Tech Arena > Stage II Tech
Register FAQ Members List Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old December 11th, 2006, 08:17 PM
oldtimer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 448
Stage 2 engine balancing

What's the ideal bob weight per-centages for a stage 2 used for drag racing 95% of the time ?

Is 50% reciprocating the norm for Poly mounts and spinning 7500 RPM

Anyone try overbalancing ? Is it necessary ?

What about internal VS external balancing ?

Thanks for your help.

George
__________________
Oldtimer


'87 GN ( original owner )
Cal Hartline prepared Stage 2

9.76 et @ 148.07 @ 25# with awful 1.80+ 60 fts. (some more work to do)

G S C A 2865
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old December 12th, 2006, 12:18 PM
Always Look Forward
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 3,618
Internal balancing makes for easier external component replacement. Flywheel, damper. For high performance, 50 percent is the recommended factor. It will require the installation of heavy metal to the crank. I'm using poly mounts with a stock style rubber trans mount and the vibration is very manageable. Hardly noticeable unless you really concentrate on picking it up.
__________________
Donnie
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old December 12th, 2006, 01:02 PM
oldtimer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 448
Thanks Donnie,

much appreciated ! What piston to cylinder wall clearance would you recommend .... 4.005" bore

George
__________________
Oldtimer


'87 GN ( original owner )
Cal Hartline prepared Stage 2

9.76 et @ 148.07 @ 25# with awful 1.80+ 60 fts. (some more work to do)

G S C A 2865
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old December 12th, 2006, 07:02 PM
Always Look Forward
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 3,618
I can only relay what I've used. With JE pistons (relatively high growth) I've used .0065" with no piston noise (Alky ver.2.0). I've used .0072" with a previous engine (Alky ver.1.0), again JE, and could hear slight piston slap until after the first run (heated up). Both cases were with alcohol fuel which runs a bit cooler than gasoline. HP levels around 1,000. Ring seal (gapless top Total Seals) stayed good throughout the life of the engine (2% leakdown and less).
__________________
Donnie
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old December 12th, 2006, 08:37 PM
oldtimer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 448
Thanks Donnie

I should have mentioned that I'm going with JE's

George
__________________
Oldtimer


'87 GN ( original owner )
Cal Hartline prepared Stage 2

9.76 et @ 148.07 @ 25# with awful 1.80+ 60 fts. (some more work to do)

G S C A 2865
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old December 13th, 2006, 10:17 AM
Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtimer View Post
Thanks Donnie

I should have mentioned that I'm going with JE's

George
George,
The pistons you received has a spec sheet with a suggested clearance, I
have always used their recommended clearances without an problems. As we
talked earlier balancing the crank would depend on how it was originally done.
__________________
Dan Strezo
DLS Engine Development
886 E 900 N
Wheatfield IN 46392
219-956-3653
Driver, Builder,and Transporter of J Lubrants
8.61@ 161.** TSO car


DLS Engine
dlsengine@hotmail.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old December 13th, 2006, 07:15 PM
oldtimer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 448
Quote:
Originally Posted by V6gofast View Post
George,
The pistons you received has a spec sheet with a suggested clearance, I
have always used their recommended clearances without an problems. As we
talked earlier balancing the crank would depend on how it was originally done.
Thanks Dan,

The sheet says for bores from 4.000 up to 4.200 the minimum clearance is
.0035 to .0045 (Quote ... Some applications such as supercharged, turbo, nitrous and endurance applications may require .001 to .003 to be added to the minimum clearances, unquote) so I was just wondering what the extra clearance might be for our stage 2 applications, if any.

Comments ...

George
__________________
Oldtimer


'87 GN ( original owner )
Cal Hartline prepared Stage 2

9.76 et @ 148.07 @ 25# with awful 1.80+ 60 fts. (some more work to do)

G S C A 2865
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old December 13th, 2006, 07:33 PM
Always Look Forward
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 3,618
The suggested clearance that comes with the pistons is very general and usually does not take into account the exact anticipated application.
The more HP you're planning on, the more clearance you will need. More HP means more heat that will be transferred to the piston, which means more growth. This is a decision where experience comes in handy. If it is a street application keep it on the tight side. If it is a track only engine, go for the loose side. A little bit of piston slap noise when cold does not hurt a thing. It does give you some insurance in case an overheat condition comes up.

Just what HP level are you shooting for?

Dan's right on the balancing. Some setups might make it undesireable to try and change the balance configuration.
__________________
Donnie

Last edited by DonWG : December 13th, 2006 at 07:42 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question On Balancing Engine ????? PHANTASM General Turbo Buick Tech 2 July 30th, 2005 07:20 AM
Engine Balancing??... NCTURBOS Stage II Tech 0 July 28th, 2005 04:39 PM
? On Engine Balancing...... PHANTASM General Turbo Buick Tech 2 February 1st, 2005 06:56 PM
engine builders, balancing question boostedblkbeast Stage II Tech 17 November 26th, 2004 11:33 PM
Engine Balancing blueracer1969 General Turbo Buick Tech 2 October 19th, 2003 05:34 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
One of the largest message boards on the web !