Go Back   TurboBuick.Com > Tech Arena > Stage II Tech
Register FAQ Members List Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old November 7th, 2006, 05:49 PM
TransAm WS6 420's Avatar
Professional Smack Talker
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: South Florida
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 714
Largest displacement using TA block?

I heard rumor of a raised cam version of this block that would allow displacement into the 300's. Any truth to this? If not, what is the max displacement for this block?
__________________
1972 Chevelle Convertible
1986 Grand National
1991 GMC Syclone
2000 Trans Am WS6 - Girlfriend's toy

Needed: More toys!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old November 7th, 2006, 06:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wilson,NC
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 304
not to sure about that. But we sure could use some more cubes out of the old 6!
__________________
87' GN Stage II Coming Soon
03' Duramax/Allison
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old November 7th, 2006, 08:29 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: n. illinios
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 1,237
I think 300ci is max.
__________________
63 Chevy nova
4.5L stage duce
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old November 8th, 2006, 08:40 PM
750H.P.V6's Avatar
Former Buick Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sunny Califonia
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,515
I haven't heard of a raised cam version. Maybe Mike from TA can chime in if he's lurking out there. With the current block displacement will be limited to approx 274 cu in with a 3.625" stroke and 4" bore.

Neal

Quote:
Originally Posted by TransAm WS6 420 View Post
I heard rumor of a raised cam version of this block that would allow displacement into the 300's. Any truth to this? If not, what is the max displacement for this block?
__________________
Neal Steward

Brutal Six Racing (1996 - 2008)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old November 8th, 2006, 10:00 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: n. illinios
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 1,237
They did advertise a raised cam block I dont know if they made any. The problem with one is this a special timing set which would have to be a belt more than likely. Then there is the issues with the dist/cam sensor drive.
I looked into the same thing with a chevy block and the cutom parts got really expensive and the buick parts would be made to order. I think it could support a 3.700 crank. Also the chevy had wider oilpan rails to clear the rods,so a custom pan was needed.


If a stage 2 alum block costs 20,000-25,000 then the 300CI would top 30,000 easy
__________________
63 Chevy nova
4.5L stage duce
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old November 9th, 2006, 12:10 AM
BAGN's Avatar
GO ASTROS ! ! !
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Knee Deep In Debt!
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 1,115
Quote:
Originally Posted by 750H.P.V6 View Post
I haven't heard of a raised cam version. Maybe Mike from TA can chime in if he's lurking out there. With the current block displacement will be limited to approx 274 cu in with a 3.625" stroke and 4" bore.

Neal

Dont quote me on this, but when I talked to mike a year ago or so, I think I remember him telling me that he could go a lot larger then 4.00 bore. If my memory serves me correctly (which it seldom does) I believe it was very close to 300c.i. w/a 3.70 crank and large bore. ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
__________________
1986 Buick GN "BLACK"
10 sec. "109" motor -SOLD
Stage II w/Stage II Heads,Edelbrock Tunel Ram Intake & Big Stuff 3.
Damn Right it has A/C ! Its HOT here in Texas.
My Photo Gallery

www.CONLEYRACING.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old November 9th, 2006, 12:41 AM
750H.P.V6's Avatar
Former Buick Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sunny Califonia
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,515
Chris,

It was of the belief that the max recommended bore size was 4.00" per TA. Not to say you couldn't go larger but I would wonder what sleeve wall thickness you'd end up with. With what the LS1 guy's are doing I'm sure you could find a replacement sleeve that would allow greater than a 4.00" bore. As far as the stroke goes you'll still run into the a cam clearance issue like you would in a Stage II block. If you were to build an odd fire engine you could probably go with a 3.750" stroke due to the smaller crankpin diameter.

Neal

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAGN View Post
Dont quote me on this, but when I talked to mike a year ago or so, I think I remember him telling me that he could go a lot larger then 4.00 bore. If my memory serves me correctly (which it seldom does) I believe it was very close to 300c.i. w/a 3.70 crank and large bore. ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
__________________
Neal Steward

Brutal Six Racing (1996 - 2008)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old November 9th, 2006, 09:52 AM
Nick Micale's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 3,514
Having been involved in the block design and production from the start, I can say that a raised cam version was never advertised, or even designed for production. The concept was discussed and some checking into the feasibility of doing this was done, but there would be such a limited demand, production has not been considered up until this time.

The "recommended" bore limit is 4" just as Neal stated, and he is right on with the comment about stroke also.

What is being considered for a future run would be a change in the block oiling. Since the design is based upon the Stage II block, oil first goes to the lifters and cam, then to the main and rod bearings.

A study is under way to re-design for priority oiling to send oil first to the bearings, and then to the valve train. This way, oil could be better restricted to the heads and any lifter displacement would not affect oil supply to the mains.
__________________
Nick Micale
3334 W. Marconi Ave
Phoenix, AZ 85053
602-866-9908
Home of the world's fastest stock block Buick!
www.arizonaGN.net
arizonagn@qwest.net
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old November 9th, 2006, 10:00 AM
Always Look Forward
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 3,618
I went 4.00 on my TA block and the sleeve wall thickness is scary. If your interested on what it ended up being, I can measure it. This time around, since I have to replace the sleeves, I'm going with a 3.930 bore size to give me a bit more sleeve thickness. If you were to go over 4.0 with a TA block you would need to bore the block out to fit larger OD sleeves. I'm not sure how close the oil galleries are to the bores. That would have to be checked out before you bore the block.
__________________
Donnie
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
One of the largest message boards on the web !