Go Back   TurboBuick.Com > Tech Arena > Smog tech and emissions tech
Register FAQ Members List Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old November 14th, 2007, 07:15 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 10
I came opon this site while searching for emissions help, non turbo buick

If I dont own a turbo buick is it possible to still get help in this regard?

I read alot of the post in the emissions help section, but had my own questions.
I noticed a few guys know ALOT about reading the printouts and was wondering if I could get some help in this regard.

I am in Maryland and have a 1991 pontiac firebird 350 tpi. treadmill test failing HC and NoX, have some room in the Co department. after tweaking fuel injector constant, before that I failed all 3 test.

If it is OK I will post up my reading and pictures of the read outs, if not I will just read up on some stuff since I wanted a TTA or at least do the engine swap into another thirdgen fbody.

Last edited by MdFormula350 : November 14th, 2007 at 07:20 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old November 15th, 2007, 05:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Warren, Oregon
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by MdFormula350 View Post
I am in Maryland and have a 1991 pontiac firebird 350 tpi. treadmill test failing HC and NoX, have some room in the Co department. after tweaking fuel injector constant, before that I failed all 3 test.

.
Sounds like you are running too much timing. How new is your cat? Post your numbers.
__________________
1987 GN, 2-1984 Hurst Oldsmobiles - one with 1987 GN drivetrain, the other soon to be.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old November 15th, 2007, 06:02 PM
johnnyttype's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: marriottsville, Md
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 808
yea def. post the numbers! check to see if ur egr is functioning properly, if it is not that could cause the NoX issue, and like mikestertwo said, high timing can cause a rich condition.

im from maryland and my friend got is 350tbi to pass emissions with no cats!!! what he did was create a vacuum leak and backed off ignition timing before the test!
__________________
86 T-type: 234ci., 206 roller, o-ringed ported heads and intake matched, 6152E turbo, 3in. dpipe, poston headers, 3in. torque tech exhaust. walbro 340, hotwired, 60lb inj., rjc powerplate, kn filter, Lt1 Maf w/trans., qboost controller, forged pistons, rods and crank. billet center caps. adj. fpr., 3400 L/U PTC converter(NEW). 11.824/4mile @117.2, 1.82 60ft, 21-22psi. street tires and 93 oct. razor alky! my daily driver!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old November 15th, 2007, 06:43 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 10
I have been trying to get help off my thirdgen websites but I thought I would try hear since from the threads I was reading on here people really have experience in this stuff. Most of this info. has just been copied and pasted so disregard it sounding weird


Here are the mods/delted stuff that matters most in emissions:

race shorty headers
no cats
no mufflers
no egr
no evap ccp
no a.i.r

Also I use 93 octane gas all the time.

new plugs, wires are good, new injectors, stock fuel pressure and stock regulator. I am using the stock a/c delco plugs that my car calls for with stock gap. aftermarket msd blaster 2 coil. other things that might affect test would be I have a 2800 lockup stall, with the stock torque converter settings for lockup speeds, etc... someone suggested on another board that I should keep the converter unlocked for test which would be speeds under 70 mph i think, might keep my reading more constant.

Test 1: Failure all 3

-chip had injector constant at 22, and I just put in 24s.
-chip 8 base timing, base timing set at 0 on engine.
-stock timing chart as well as stock fuel chart I believe.
-fan 1 I turned off, fan 2 I believe came on with the stock fan switch in the head, since it didnt get to the redline in temp but was def. up there at least 240
-outside was raining and about 58 degrees outside and humid

HC CO NOx
State 1.0000 GPM 20.0000 GPM 2.2000 GPM
My 1.7454 24.2047 3.3139
F F F

Test 2: Failure 2 out of 3

-chip injector set to 26, and I have 24s
-chip base timing set to 12, base timing set at 0 on engine.
-stock timing and fuel charts.
-fan 1 set at 235, off 230, however while I set sitting there it got passed 235 it seemed and I got worried and flipped my fan 2 switch on, so the whole time the fan 2 was on and the temp on the engine was about 185
-outside temp was 65 and sunny

HC CO NOx
State 1.0000 GPM 20.0000 GPM 2.2000 GPM
My 1.1174 16.5176 2.5409
F P F

Just from those readings I am going to double check my fan 1 does come on, and I think I am going to up the base timing in the chip to read 20.
would it be ok to try and lower engine base timing to under zero?

From these readings what else should I touch, since all did lower alot.

Test 3: Failure 2 out of 3

weather was crappy today, not raining anymore but humid and around 55 out.


this is what i tried today.

new chip with engine timing at 0, chip base at 0
lowered max timing from 42 to 30, and lowered all timing -5 on the charts, probably didnt take out enough timing

injectors set at 24 which they are, and for the fuel charts -5 throughout.

1/4 of the usual 93 gas, 2 to 3 bottles of the 91% rubbing alcohol and a small thing of octane booster (i am getting desperate).

fan comes on at 231 off and 225 regardless of vehicle speed.

HC CO NOx
State 1.0000 GPM 20.0000 GPM 2.2000 GPM
Readings 2.1073 GPM 15.6176 GPM 3.8295 GPM

I guess I need to start over again, I dont think it likes to run hot??? At least the NO is always high when it runs hot, maybe I need to cap the temp to 220 and no higher.


test 1 printout



test 2



test 3




I think my best choice to is maybe tweak the tc lockup some, set the chip base timing to 0 and -12 throughout the low to mid range and -15 middle to higher; set the injector constant to 26 again, fan to come on at 228 and off at 220.

with about 1/4 of gas i am going to add the gallon of denatured alcohol I purchased today and I think with decent outside temp and weather it might pass.

Last edited by MdFormula350 : November 15th, 2007 at 07:14 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old November 15th, 2007, 07:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Warren, Oregon
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,769
[quote=MdFormula350;1709460]
race shorty headers
no cats
no mufflers
no egr
no evap ccp
no a.i.r
QUOTE]

With that setup your going to have a little trouble getting it to pass. If I'm not mistaken the 91's were a speed density system (MAP), not a MAF system which makes it more difficult. Without a cat, egr, and the a.i.r. it's going to be difficult.
__________________
1987 GN, 2-1984 Hurst Oldsmobiles - one with 1987 GN drivetrain, the other soon to be.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old November 15th, 2007, 07:24 PM
johnnyttype's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: marriottsville, Md
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 808
man, looks like the 2nd time was pretty close! yea with ur mods it is gonna be hard but im sure it is possible

coolant temp i would not let get too high especially without EGR because there is nothing to cool the combustion chambers anymore. i would imagine higher NOx readings would come from higher coolant temps.

maybe try goin back to setup #2 and take a couple more degrees of timing out from that setup, but not too much, and maybe some Guranteed to pass.
__________________
86 T-type: 234ci., 206 roller, o-ringed ported heads and intake matched, 6152E turbo, 3in. dpipe, poston headers, 3in. torque tech exhaust. walbro 340, hotwired, 60lb inj., rjc powerplate, kn filter, Lt1 Maf w/trans., qboost controller, forged pistons, rods and crank. billet center caps. adj. fpr., 3400 L/U PTC converter(NEW). 11.824/4mile @117.2, 1.82 60ft, 21-22psi. street tires and 93 oct. razor alky! my daily driver!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old November 15th, 2007, 07:38 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 10
yeah speed density, I like not having a maf makes the engine bay look cleaner

anyway yeah this is what I am going to do next good weather day, I have till FEB. 08 something.

both 2 times I have passed with the same exhaust other than tranny work / stall has been idle test only and I have tried to get it again but no dice even with 3 diff. people nope the first time I had to go I went when the car was bone stock and they gave me a waiver for it being too low, now after dropping the car an inch I have to take the test now, lol

this is what I am going to try:

injector constant setting to 27 maybe
setting the tc lockup to over 70mph at the min.
timing engine at zero since the first test, chip base timing setting I am going to set to 0 then just remove -12 to -15 throughout the charts and cap max. timing to 20.
I will leave the fuel charts alone or maybe -1 or -2 throughout.
fan setting 215 on, 195 off regardless of vehicle speed, i do think when it gets to hot it starts getting higher NoX.

1/4 93 with gallon of denatured alcohol then ride to the place which is 13 miles mostly highway.

o yeah usually before swapping in the new chip I unplug the ecu fuse for a minute or two to erase and thinking it has .

If I dont get really close this time I am going to redo the exhaust with some cats and vbands so I can install delete pipes on and off quickly.

why cant they leave sports cars alone!

Last edited by MdFormula350 : November 15th, 2007 at 07:44 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old November 15th, 2007, 07:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Warren, Oregon
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,769
Are you running the stock cam?
__________________
1987 GN, 2-1984 Hurst Oldsmobiles - one with 1987 GN drivetrain, the other soon to be.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old November 15th, 2007, 08:05 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 10
yeah just a stock internal 350 tpi with exhaust, pulies, tranny mods, and suspension.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old November 15th, 2007, 11:25 PM
johnnyttype's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: marriottsville, Md
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by MdFormula350 View Post
why cant they leave sports cars alone!
cause they're exhaust nazi's!!! although they did give my friend a waiver for his 88 GMC S15 pickup with dual stacks

i just got historic tags on my car for maryland and now i am rocking them all the way up in Michigan! no more emissions for me
__________________
86 T-type: 234ci., 206 roller, o-ringed ported heads and intake matched, 6152E turbo, 3in. dpipe, poston headers, 3in. torque tech exhaust. walbro 340, hotwired, 60lb inj., rjc powerplate, kn filter, Lt1 Maf w/trans., qboost controller, forged pistons, rods and crank. billet center caps. adj. fpr., 3400 L/U PTC converter(NEW). 11.824/4mile @117.2, 1.82 60ft, 21-22psi. street tires and 93 oct. razor alky! my daily driver!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old November 16th, 2007, 06:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: md
Trader Rating: (3)
Posts: 138
try to find a tester that needs money, my cousin got his car to pass for$80
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old November 16th, 2007, 07:13 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 10
I will try those things in my next chip and see what happens. I am going to try next week sometime when the weather looks a tad better.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old November 20th, 2007, 03:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Laurel, MD
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 2,223
Looks to me like going from test 1 to test 2 you moved everything in the right direction so I would go further. Take your test 2 chip and advance the timing another 4-6 degrees and raise the injector constant 2-4 to try to lean it out some more. I always wondered what effect timing had on NOx, and guessed that advancing it would increase the chamber temps and raise NOx, but you advanced it and lowered NOx, and then later retarded it a bunch and raised the NOx, so I'm ready to believe I was wrong :-). You are also so close that if you put any kind of 3-way cat on the car it would pass.
__________________
Regards,
Carl Ijames carl.ijames@verizon.net
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old November 21st, 2007, 12:03 AM
sprayhead
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 1,110
I'm with you Carl. And diesel inj timing is analogous to spark timing, and advancing that raises peak combustion temps, which raises NOx. But also tends to lower the HC. Conversely, retarding the timing tends to lower peak combustion temps and thus NOx, but then tends to raise HC.

TurboTR
__________________
Austin area dealer for FAST engine management, SCT tuning, Precision turbos, intercoolers, wastegates, fuel injectors, fuel pumps, etc. WOT cylinder pressure testing available. Todd (512) 422-6049c.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old November 21st, 2007, 06:11 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 10
test 4: kinda getting somewhere. failed hc, passed CO and NOx

things i did.

1/4 tank of 93 like usual with 1 gallon of denatured alcohol.
fuel injector constant 26
stock fuel charts but -1
timing: 0 on engine, 8 base in chip, -10 on stock spark charts, max timing advance 25
torque converter lockup at 50, instead of 38.
fan on a 225, off at 200.



HC CO NOx
State 1.0000 GPM 20.0000 GPM 2.2000 GPM
Readings 1.7634 GPM 11.9250 GPM 1.8673 GPM



I think since this is my first time running the denatured it might now be too lean now?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old November 25th, 2007, 10:46 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 10
well i am going to try the injector constant at 24 now, run the gas down to under 1/4 then pour in the 2 quarts of alcohol I have left. and give that a try.

should I mess with any timing also? I am thinking now its mostly fuel tuning only needed.

maybe move up the converter lockup to over 60?


thank you
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old November 30th, 2007, 07:18 AM
87gta-turbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Beaufort, SC
Trader Rating: (2)
Posts: 953
Maybe go into the test with 87 octane & denatured mix.. The 93 might not be burning completely.
__________________
Steve-

1987 GN, Astroroof, GNX dash, 109 3.8, .030 TRW forged, TE-62, CXR fmic, G Body DP, 212/212 cam, 60-65 Siemens inj, TT chip, LS1 MAF, port matched intake and heads, Razor's meth. inj. CK Trans, Pats Conv, Metco LCA's
Monitored by:PLX WB, EGT, SM & DS

11.8 @ 117 w/ 4.1 -(R.I.P. 7/25/08)


1987 Gray Regal T-- Low Options: Bucket seats w/ console, G80, AM/FM, Pwr windows & Ant., thats it!
LS1 MAF, 32lb inj, Chip, mostly stock
and staying that way....

2001 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 I6 4x4
K&N
Daily Driver

Out of F bodies..for good.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old November 30th, 2007, 11:49 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 10
you may be right, from the Co being so low I assumed it was just running lean, but the higher octane still might be causing the HC numbers to be too high still.

right now I got about alittle over 1/4 of 93 and most of the gallon of the denatured out of the system.

I guess I can run low again, fill up with some 87 about 1/4 tank then pour in just one quart of the alcohol and try that.

so leave everything else alone?

I think ur right maybe with all the timing out of the system I dont need 93 because it doesnt see close to wot anyway so no knocking should occur away.



thanks I really never thought about changing the gas octane much.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode