VP ready?

[86NYGN]

Palin vindicated?: ADN Editorial | adn.com

She would fit into Bush's admin like a glove.

[Black Power]

Her abusing power to go after a guy that tazed his stepson or a guy that is good buddies with a couple terrorists...I will take her, thanks.

[pdzz]

Originally Posted by Black Power

Her abusing power to go after a guy that tazed his stepson or a guy that is good buddies with a couple terrorists...I will take her, thanks.

X2

[salvageV6]

Last I checked all those people Hitlery fired in travelgate were still fired.

Dumocraps started the firing people they don't like precedent, live with it.

Palin is a good girl.

The other alternative is Joe Bitem.

X3

[86NYGN]

Amazing how the "replies" have nothing to do with the SUBJECT of the article.
I figured that somehow it would be a "Clintons" fault.
I especially like how all the 60's and 70's radicals are now called "DOMESTIC TERRORISTS"
For the reading challenged the article is about how Palin says she was "cleared" in the report when she was NOT CLEARED.
Article says nothing about "domestic TERRORISTS",travelgate,firing people,Joe Biden nor anything else you care to "SPIN" it clearly states that it is about Palin stating she was "cleared" when in fact she wasn't "cleared".

[salvageV6]

Newsflash some 60's/70's radicals actually WERE domestic terrorists.

You can also thank your PC lefty friends for helping with that name.

Anyone with an illegal gun, or bomb or, threat of one has got to be a domestic terrorist.

Your article is also an editorial, so is my reply.

She was cleared for firing the Commissioner simply because she could for any reason, just like President BUSH and those fired prosecutors.

You do remember that one?

By the way you can't spin on Obama and the Klintons because what was posted about them is the truth.

[UNGN]

OMG!!!! Palin did something that "wasn't appropriate".

[IEATV8S]

Originally Posted by 86NYGN

Amazing how the "replies" have nothing to do with the SUBJECT of the article.
I figured that somehow it would be a "Clintons" fault.
I especially like how all the 60's and 70's radicals are now called "DOMESTIC TERRORISTS"
For the reading challenged the article is about how Palin says she was "cleared" in the report when she was NOT CLEARED.
Article says nothing about "domestic TERRORISTS",travelgate,firing people,Joe Biden nor anything else you care to "SPIN" it clearly states that it is about Palin stating she was "cleared" when in fact she wasn't "cleared".

Would you please tell all of us what SPECIFIC LAW Gov. Palin was GUILTY of breaking?

And when you get done trying to spin that, please let us know what charge she is going to be arrested on, and who will arrest her for whatever charge it is she broke?

Once an FAGGERAL, you just can't paper train them, they piss all over the place!

[86NYGN]

Originally Posted by 86NYGN

Amazing how the "replies" have nothing to do with the SUBJECT of the article.
I figured that somehow it would be a "Clintons" fault.
I especially like how all the 60's and 70's radicals are now called "DOMESTIC TERRORISTS"
For the reading challenged the article is about how Palin says she was "cleared" in the report when she was NOT CLEARED.
Article says nothing about "domestic TERRORISTS",travelgate,firing people,Joe Biden nor anything else you care to "SPIN" it clearly states that it is about Palin stating she was "cleared" when in fact she wasn't "cleared".

Hmmmmmmmmmmm, amazing how there is no mention in my reply about"what SPECIFIC LAW Gov. Palin was GUILTY of breaking? " Now I did mention the "reading challenged" and look at who replied. Usually if someone READS an article they will then have some sort of idea WHAT THE ARTICLE states.

[IEATV8S]

Originally Posted by 86NYGN

Hmmmmmmmmmmm, amazing how there is no mention in my reply about"what SPECIFIC LAW Gov. Palin was GUILTY of breaking? " Now I did mention the "reading challenged" and look at who replied. Usually if someone READS an article they will then have some sort of idea WHAT THE ARTICLE states.

I presumed you were SMART enough to know that what was issued was ONLY a report to the committee by the investigator Branchflower, a Democrat and acknowledged Obama supporter! This was all Branchflowers REPORT and in no way any sort of indictment of Gov. Palin! I should have known that you have NO IDEA what was going on with this case, but just picked out what you wanted from the many left wing websites that state untruths!

The Committee has taken NO ACTION against Sarah Palin, and in all probability WON'T take any action, as the investigator had an acknowledged agenda to fullfill! You notice that NOTHING has been said or done since it was issued to the committee!

Perhaps you should read from the final complaint issued by the investigator!

"Pursuant to a unanimous bi-partisan vote of the Alaska Legislative Council taken on July 28, 2008, a contract for legal services was entered into between the Council and me to provide legal services. The contract provides that I, as the Consultant to the Council

"shall provide legal services to investigate the circumstances and events surrounding the termination of former Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan and potential abuses of power and/or improper actions by members of the executive branch. The Consultant shall conduct its investigation in a professional, unbiased, independent, objective manner, and conduct the investigation at arm's length from the political process. The Consultant shall prepare a final report, including any recommendations for action by the Legislature, and submit it to the Agency in a timely manner. If the report includes confidential information, that information shall be set out in a separate attachment so that the main portion of the report consists solely of information that may be disclosed to the public."

For those interested here's WHO Steve Branchflower is and who are the people he's associated with!

* Who is Steve Branchflower?*by*Macsmind - Official Blog of the MacRanger Show

Who is Steve Branchflower, the hired gun for the Palin investigation?

Via BarackBook, a Facebook styled site that keeps track of Obama’s “friends”, comes this work up.

“Branchflower And Walt Monegan Were Colleagues. “If Plummer and his troops can make it happen, these warmed-up cases may be only the beginning. [Anchorage Police Chief] Monegan has ‘given us the time, and we’re going to give him the results,’ Plummer said. As head of the new unit, Plummer is following a department legend. In 1984, Sgt. Mike Grimes, along with Gifford and former prosecutor Steve Branchflower, developed a team approach to working homicides that proved successful into the 1990s, attracting praise from the FBI among others.” (Sheila Toomey, “Cold Cases Brought To Front Burner,” Anchorage Daily News, 5/5/02)”

Branchflower And Democrat Hollis French Are Former Colleagues. “French will supervise Branchflower. French, also a former prosecutor and colleague of Branchflower, has told the council that the investigator will go to work gathering evidence and could come back to lawmakers if ’some people just won’t talk.’ The House and Senate Judiciary Committees could then issue subpoenas to compel testimony.” (Megan Holland, “Branchflower Will Investigate Monegan Case,” Anchorage Daily News, 8/2/08)

Branchflower Deferred Questions Regarding The Subpoena List To Obama Partisan, French. “Rep. David Guttenberg (D.) asked Branchflower why he was requesting subpoenas for only those people attending the meeting and not Tibbles himself. Branchflower said he would ‘have to defer that question to Mr. French.’ ’I put the list together with, talking to Mr. French,’ Branchflower added. Sen. Gene Therriault (R.) told Branchflower, ‘I don’t understand why you would have to defer that question to Sen. French. If it’s your list you’re in complete control of the list, then why can’t you answer the question?’ Branchflower had no explanation.” (Amanda Carpenter, “Obama Partisan Tampers With Palin Subpoena List,” Townhall, 9/13/08)”

It’s clear from the record that Branchflower has a long-standing relationship with Monegan and especially with Hollis French, much of what he failed to disclose from the outset. This of course would explain the report which offers more opinion than fact and moreover completely throws the unbiasedness of the investigation into question.

Perhaps it’s Branchflower who should be looked into?

[Gothmog]

If Palin's brother in law attacked a child with a tazer, why isnt he in jail?
Why didnt Palin openly ask for his dismissal, rather than go after him by having her husband harrass his boss

sounds very Cheney-esque. Rather than call Joe Wilson a liar in public, he has his minions trash him "off the record"

[pdzz]

Originally Posted by Gothmog

If Palin's brother in law attacked a child with a tazer, why isnt he in jail?
Why didnt Palin openly ask for his dismissal, rather than go after him by having her husband harrass his boss

sounds very Cheney-esque. Rather than call Joe Wilson a liar in public, he has his minions trash him "off the record"

It was his son.

[IEATV8S]

Originally Posted by pdzz

It was his son.

Small details like that he misses!!!!

[Gothmog]

I know that it was his son, but since the guy wasnt fired it kinda makes you think that there is more to the story. Since she didnt publicly go after him, but had her husband pressure Wooten's boss secretly, makes you think something is up

[86NYGN]

Originally Posted by 86NYGN

Hmmmmmmmmmmm, amazing how there is no mention in my reply about"what SPECIFIC LAW Gov. Palin was GUILTY of breaking? " Now I did mention the "reading challenged" and look at who replied. Usually if someone READS an article they will then have some sort of idea WHAT THE ARTICLE states.

Ah lets see if I can possibly dumb this down for the "political guru" who still can't either read or comprehend the article. Palin said that she was CLEARED when in REALITY the report states that she did in fact ABUSE HER POWER. Now it seems that all here EXCEPT for one read and understood what they read so I have C&Ped the article's own words for the benefit of the "slow kid" in the class; "She claims the report "vindicates" her. She said that the investigation found "no unlawful or unethical activity on my part."

Her response is either astoundingly ignorant or downright Orwellian. Page 8, Finding Number One of the report says: "I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act."

In plain English, she did something "unlawful." She broke the state ethics law.Palin asserted that the report found "there was no abuse of authority at all in trying to get Officer Wooten fired."

In fact, the report concluded that "impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates in order to advance a personal agenda, to wit: to get Trooper Michael Wooten fired."

Now the point of this thread was to point out how her own constituants, that would be the residents of Alaska, are being "mislead" by her "vindication pronouncement" when she was not vindicated,". Page 8, Finding Number One of the report says: "I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act."
I don't care who wrote the report or what party he belonged to, what color his socks are or if he went to church the point remains that she read the report and said it vidicated her when it in fact did nothing of the sort. She is not smart enough to read it and realize what it said about her "ethics abuse" just like the "political guru" here is not smart enough to.

[Gothmog]

In order to be a good republican you have to selectively enforce laws. The ends ALWAYS justify the means to a republican

they dont care if she acted illegally, because Wooten tazered his son
they dont care that Libby lied about outing a CIA agent because no harm was done
they dont care that we were lied into a war..cause we got rid of an "evil dictator"

[IEATV8S]

Originally Posted by 86NYGN

Ah lets see if I can possibly dumb this down for the "political guru" who still can't either read or comprehend the article. Palin said that she was CLEARED when in REALITY the report states that she did in fact ABUSE HER POWER. Now it seems that all here EXCEPT for one read and understood what they read so I have C&Ped the article's own words for the benefit of the "slow kid" in the class; "She claims the report "vindicates" her. She said that the investigation found "no unlawful or unethical activity on my part."

Her response is either astoundingly ignorant or downright Orwellian. Page 8, Finding Number One of the report says: "I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act."

In plain English, she did something "unlawful." She broke the state ethics law.Palin asserted that the report found "there was no abuse of authority at all in trying to get Officer Wooten fired."

In fact, the report concluded that "impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates in order to advance a personal agenda, to wit: to get Trooper Michael Wooten fired."

Now the point of this thread was to point out how her own constituants, that would be the residents of Alaska, are being "mislead" by her "vindication pronouncement" when she was not vindicated,". Page 8, Finding Number One of the report says: "I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act."
I don't care who wrote the report or what party he belonged to, what color his socks are or if he went to church the point remains that she read the report and said it vidicated her when it in fact did nothing of the sort. She is not smart enough to read it and realize what it said about her "ethics abuse" just like the "political guru" here is not smart enough to.

For the idiot that doesn't UNDERSTAND what he reads, that REPORT, was just that, a report, nothing more or less! That was one man's opinion of the situation, NOT THE COMMITTEE that has the final word on if the governor was guilty or not!

How much easier do I have to get to point out that NO ILLEGALITIES or unethical activity has been found by the committee. ANY one of the Committee can write a report, or they can have another investigator do another investigation, or decide that there is NO ACTION to be taken.

The COMMITTEE responsible for any action, has NOT made a decision! Until that time, the Governor's statements are correct. She has NOT been charged or indicted in any wrongdoing!

How dumb are you? It's a partisns investigtion, as shown by my links to who the investigtor was, and what he said especially about subpoenaes!!!!