VP ready?

[86NYGN]

Palin vindicated?: ADN Editorial | adn.com

She would fit into Bush's admin like a glove.

[Black Power]

Her abusing power to go after a guy that tazed his stepson or a guy that is good buddies with a couple terrorists...I will take her, thanks.

[pdzz]

Originally Posted by Black Power

Her abusing power to go after a guy that tazed his stepson or a guy that is good buddies with a couple terrorists...I will take her, thanks.

X2

[salvageV6]

Last I checked all those people Hitlery fired in travelgate were still fired.

Dumocraps started the firing people they don't like precedent, live with it.

Palin is a good girl.

The other alternative is Joe Bitem.

X3

[86NYGN]

Amazing how the "replies" have nothing to do with the SUBJECT of the article.
I figured that somehow it would be a "Clintons" fault.
I especially like how all the 60's and 70's radicals are now called "DOMESTIC TERRORISTS"
For the reading challenged the article is about how Palin says she was "cleared" in the report when she was NOT CLEARED.
Article says nothing about "domestic TERRORISTS",travelgate,firing people,Joe Biden nor anything else you care to "SPIN" it clearly states that it is about Palin stating she was "cleared" when in fact she wasn't "cleared".

[salvageV6]

Newsflash some 60's/70's radicals actually WERE domestic terrorists.

You can also thank your PC lefty friends for helping with that name.

Anyone with an illegal gun, or bomb or, threat of one has got to be a domestic terrorist.

Your article is also an editorial, so is my reply.

She was cleared for firing the Commissioner simply because she could for any reason, just like President BUSH and those fired prosecutors.

You do remember that one?

By the way you can't spin on Obama and the Klintons because what was posted about them is the truth.

[UNGN]

OMG!!!! Palin did something that "wasn't appropriate".

[IEATV8S]

Originally Posted by 86NYGN

Amazing how the "replies" have nothing to do with the SUBJECT of the article.
I figured that somehow it would be a "Clintons" fault.
I especially like how all the 60's and 70's radicals are now called "DOMESTIC TERRORISTS"
For the reading challenged the article is about how Palin says she was "cleared" in the report when she was NOT CLEARED.
Article says nothing about "domestic TERRORISTS",travelgate,firing people,Joe Biden nor anything else you care to "SPIN" it clearly states that it is about Palin stating she was "cleared" when in fact she wasn't "cleared".

Would you please tell all of us what SPECIFIC LAW Gov. Palin was GUILTY of breaking?

And when you get done trying to spin that, please let us know what charge she is going to be arrested on, and who will arrest her for whatever charge it is she broke?

Once an FAGGERAL, you just can't paper train them, they piss all over the place!

[86NYGN]

Originally Posted by 86NYGN

Amazing how the "replies" have nothing to do with the SUBJECT of the article.
I figured that somehow it would be a "Clintons" fault.
I especially like how all the 60's and 70's radicals are now called "DOMESTIC TERRORISTS"
For the reading challenged the article is about how Palin says she was "cleared" in the report when she was NOT CLEARED.
Article says nothing about "domestic TERRORISTS",travelgate,firing people,Joe Biden nor anything else you care to "SPIN" it clearly states that it is about Palin stating she was "cleared" when in fact she wasn't "cleared".

Hmmmmmmmmmmm, amazing how there is no mention in my reply about"what SPECIFIC LAW Gov. Palin was GUILTY of breaking? " Now I did mention the "reading challenged" and look at who replied. Usually if someone READS an article they will then have some sort of idea WHAT THE ARTICLE states.

[IEATV8S]

Originally Posted by 86NYGN

Hmmmmmmmmmmm, amazing how there is no mention in my reply about"what SPECIFIC LAW Gov. Palin was GUILTY of breaking? " Now I did mention the "reading challenged" and look at who replied. Usually if someone READS an article they will then have some sort of idea WHAT THE ARTICLE states.

I presumed you were SMART enough to know that what was issued was ONLY a report to the committee by the investigator Branchflower, a Democrat and acknowledged Obama supporter! This was all Branchflowers REPORT and in no way any sort of indictment of Gov. Palin! I should have known that you have NO IDEA what was going on with this case, but just picked out what you wanted from the many left wing websites that state untruths!

The Committee has taken NO ACTION against Sarah Palin, and in all probability WON'T take any action, as the investigator had an acknowledged agenda to fullfill! You notice that NOTHING has been said or done since it was issued to the committee!

Perhaps you should read from the final complaint issued by the investigator!

"Pursuant to a unanimous bi-partisan vote of the Alaska Legislative Council taken on July 28, 2008, a contract for legal services was entered into between the Council and me to provide legal services. The contract provides that I, as the Consultant to the Council

"shall provide legal services to investigate the circumstances and events surrounding the termination of former Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan and potential abuses of power and/or improper actions by members of the executive branch. The Consultant shall conduct its investigation in a professional, unbiased, independent, objective manner, and conduct the investigation at arm's length from the political process. The Consultant shall prepare a final report, including any recommendations for action by the Legislature, and submit it to the Agency in a timely manner. If the report includes confidential information, that information shall be set out in a separate attachment so that the main portion of the report consists solely of information that may be disclosed to the public."

For those interested here's WHO Steve Branchflower is and who are the people he's associated with!

* Who is Steve Branchflower?*by*Macsmind - Official Blog of the MacRanger Show

Who is Steve Branchflower, the hired gun for the Palin investigation?

Via BarackBook, a Facebook styled site that keeps track of Obama’s “friends”, comes this work up.

“Branchflower And Walt Monegan Were Colleagues. “If Plummer and his troops can make it happen, these warmed-up cases may be only the beginning. [Anchorage Police Chief] Monegan has ‘given us the time, and we’re going to give him the results,’ Plummer said. As head of the new unit, Plummer is following a department legend. In 1984, Sgt. Mike Grimes, along with Gifford and former prosecutor Steve Branchflower, developed a team approach to working homicides that proved successful into the 1990s, attracting praise from the FBI among others.” (Sheila Toomey, “Cold Cases Brought To Front Burner,” Anchorage Daily News, 5/5/02)”

Branchflower And Democrat Hollis French Are Former Colleagues. “French will supervise Branchflower. French, also a former prosecutor and colleague of Branchflower, has told the council that the investigator will go to work gathering evidence and could come back to lawmakers if ’some people just won’t talk.’ The House and Senate Judiciary Committees could then issue subpoenas to compel testimony.” (Megan Holland, “Branchflower Will Investigate Monegan Case,” Anchorage Daily News, 8/2/08)

Branchflower Deferred Questions Regarding The Subpoena List To Obama Partisan, French. “Rep. David Guttenberg (D.) asked Branchflower why he was requesting subpoenas for only those people attending the meeting and not Tibbles himself. Branchflower said he would ‘have to defer that question to Mr. French.’ ’I put the list together with, talking to Mr. French,’ Branchflower added. Sen. Gene Therriault (R.) told Branchflower, ‘I don’t understand why you would have to defer that question to Sen. French. If it’s your list you’re in complete control of the list, then why can’t you answer the question?’ Branchflower had no explanation.” (Amanda Carpenter, “Obama Partisan Tampers With Palin Subpoena List,” Townhall, 9/13/08)”

It’s clear from the record that Branchflower has a long-standing relationship with Monegan and especially with Hollis French, much of what he failed to disclose from the outset. This of course would explain the report which offers more opinion than fact and moreover completely throws the unbiasedness of the investigation into question.

Perhaps it’s Branchflower who should be looked into?

[Gothmog]

If Palin's brother in law attacked a child with a tazer, why isnt he in jail?
Why didnt Palin openly ask for his dismissal, rather than go after him by having her husband harrass his boss

sounds very Cheney-esque. Rather than call Joe Wilson a liar in public, he has his minions trash him "off the record"

[pdzz]

Originally Posted by Gothmog

If Palin's brother in law attacked a child with a tazer, why isnt he in jail?
Why didnt Palin openly ask for his dismissal, rather than go after him by having her husband harrass his boss

sounds very Cheney-esque. Rather than call Joe Wilson a liar in public, he has his minions trash him "off the record"

It was his son.

[IEATV8S]

Originally Posted by pdzz

It was his son.

Small details like that he misses!!!!

[Gothmog]

I know that it was his son, but since the guy wasnt fired it kinda makes you think that there is more to the story. Since she didnt publicly go after him, but had her husband pressure Wooten's boss secretly, makes you think something is up

[86NYGN]

Originally Posted by 86NYGN

Hmmmmmmmmmmm, amazing how there is no mention in my reply about"what SPECIFIC LAW Gov. Palin was GUILTY of breaking? " Now I did mention the "reading challenged" and look at who replied. Usually if someone READS an article they will then have some sort of idea WHAT THE ARTICLE states.

Ah lets see if I can possibly dumb this down for the "political guru" who still can't either read or comprehend the article. Palin said that she was CLEARED when in REALITY the report states that she did in fact ABUSE HER POWER. Now it seems that all here EXCEPT for one read and understood what they read so I have C&Ped the article's own words for the benefit of the "slow kid" in the class; "She claims the report "vindicates" her. She said that the investigation found "no unlawful or unethical activity on my part."

Her response is either astoundingly ignorant or downright Orwellian. Page 8, Finding Number One of the report says: "I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act."

In plain English, she did something "unlawful." She broke the state ethics law.Palin asserted that the report found "there was no abuse of authority at all in trying to get Officer Wooten fired."

In fact, the report concluded that "impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates in order to advance a personal agenda, to wit: to get Trooper Michael Wooten fired."

Now the point of this thread was to point out how her own constituants, that would be the residents of Alaska, are being "mislead" by her "vindication pronouncement" when she was not vindicated,". Page 8, Finding Number One of the report says: "I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act."
I don't care who wrote the report or what party he belonged to, what color his socks are or if he went to church the point remains that she read the report and said it vidicated her when it in fact did nothing of the sort. She is not smart enough to read it and realize what it said about her "ethics abuse" just like the "political guru" here is not smart enough to.

[Gothmog]

In order to be a good republican you have to selectively enforce laws. The ends ALWAYS justify the means to a republican

they dont care if she acted illegally, because Wooten tazered his son
they dont care that Libby lied about outing a CIA agent because no harm was done
they dont care that we were lied into a war..cause we got rid of an "evil dictator"

[IEATV8S]

Originally Posted by 86NYGN

Ah lets see if I can possibly dumb this down for the "political guru" who still can't either read or comprehend the article. Palin said that she was CLEARED when in REALITY the report states that she did in fact ABUSE HER POWER. Now it seems that all here EXCEPT for one read and understood what they read so I have C&Ped the article's own words for the benefit of the "slow kid" in the class; "She claims the report "vindicates" her. She said that the investigation found "no unlawful or unethical activity on my part."

Her response is either astoundingly ignorant or downright Orwellian. Page 8, Finding Number One of the report says: "I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act."

In plain English, she did something "unlawful." She broke the state ethics law.Palin asserted that the report found "there was no abuse of authority at all in trying to get Officer Wooten fired."

In fact, the report concluded that "impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates in order to advance a personal agenda, to wit: to get Trooper Michael Wooten fired."

Now the point of this thread was to point out how her own constituants, that would be the residents of Alaska, are being "mislead" by her "vindication pronouncement" when she was not vindicated,". Page 8, Finding Number One of the report says: "I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act."
I don't care who wrote the report or what party he belonged to, what color his socks are or if he went to church the point remains that she read the report and said it vidicated her when it in fact did nothing of the sort. She is not smart enough to read it and realize what it said about her "ethics abuse" just like the "political guru" here is not smart enough to.

For the idiot that doesn't UNDERSTAND what he reads, that REPORT, was just that, a report, nothing more or less! That was one man's opinion of the situation, NOT THE COMMITTEE that has the final word on if the governor was guilty or not!

How much easier do I have to get to point out that NO ILLEGALITIES or unethical activity has been found by the committee. ANY one of the Committee can write a report, or they can have another investigator do another investigation, or decide that there is NO ACTION to be taken.

The COMMITTEE responsible for any action, has NOT made a decision! Until that time, the Governor's statements are correct. She has NOT been charged or indicted in any wrongdoing!

How dumb are you? It's a partisns investigtion, as shown by my links to who the investigtor was, and what he said especially about subpoenaes!!!!

[IEATV8S]

Originally Posted by Gothmog

In order to be a good republican you have to selectively enforce laws. The ends ALWAYS justify the means to a republican

they dont care if she acted illegally, because Wooten tazered his son
they dont care that Libby lied about outing a CIA agent because no harm was done
they dont care that we were lied into a war..cause we got rid of an "evil dictator"

AZZHAT Democrats and their supporters don't care that BJ LIED before a criminal court!
They don't care that COLD CASH Jefferson had $90,000 in marked money in his freezer!
They don't care that Dodd and Frank caused the worst economic diseaster in America's history since CARETER!!!

[Gothmog]

Originally Posted by IEATV8S

AZZHAT Democrats and their supporters don't care that BJ LIED before a criminal court!
They don't care that COLD CASH Jefferson had $90,000 in marked money in his freezer!
They don't care that Dodd and Frank caused the worst economic diseaster in America's history since CARETER!!!

who said that?
we care about those issues. Jefferson should go to jail, and Clinton should have been admonished- not impeached.

and the other claim is beyond absurd

[BlownZ]

Originally Posted by Gothmog

In order to be a good republican you have to selectively enforce laws. The ends ALWAYS justify the means to a republican

they dont care if she acted illegally, because Wooten tazered his son
they dont care that Libby lied about outing a CIA agent because no harm was done
they dont care that we were lied into a war..cause we got rid of an "evil dictator"

Maybe true...maybe not...but one thing is clear....to an idiot....nothing ever makes sense.

[87gta-turbo]

The article said:
Has Gov. Palin committed an impeachable offense? Hardly.

Is what she did indictable? No.

and then they call it "trooper GATE" WTF is that!?
That is the media bull$hit when ever they add GATE to something it's some sensationalized crap.
Its not like she was smoking pot in office, because we all know only pathetic, worthless, losers, who are unable to form coherent thoughts smoke pot.
I mean come on.....

[Gothmog]

Originally Posted by 87gta-turbo

The article said:
Has Gov. Palin committed an impeachable offense? Hardly.

Is what she did indictable? No.

and then they call it "trooper GATE" WTF is that!?
That is the media bull$hit when ever they add GATE to something it's some sensationalized crap.
Its not like she was smoking pot in office, because we all know only pathetic, worthless, losers, who are unable to form coherent thoughts smoke pot.
I mean come on.....

Clinton didnt commit an impeachable offense either, but they impeached him

[IEATV8S]

Originally Posted by Gothmog

Clinton didnt commit an impeachable offense either, but they impeached him

HE LIED UNDER OATH IN A CRIMINAL HEARING, THE SAME THING YOU FAGGERALS CLAIM LIBBY DID!!!

INSTEAD OF GOING TO JAIL, KLINTON WAS IMPEACHED, THEY SHOULD HAVE THROWN HIS ASS IN JAIL!

[TexasT]

Originally Posted by Gothmog

who said that?
we care about those issues. Jefferson should go to jail, and Clinton should have been admonished- not impeached.

and the other claim is beyond absurd

Beyond absurd? What/Who do you think caused the latest crash? The housing market is a pretty large part of the economy and the two listed had a pretty large part in bringing the fm/fm fiasco to fruition. I believe this led to the decline in the stock market. What do you think caused it?

As far as the topic. The report was an opinion. You could write one and it would hold the same weight. Until proven guilty one is innocent in this country. Isn't that how it works?

[Gothmog]

Originally Posted by IEATV8S

HE LIED UNDER OATH IN A CRIMINAL HEARING, THE SAME THING YOU FAGGERALS CLAIM LIBBY DID!!!

INSTEAD OF GOING TO JAIL, KLINTON WAS IMPEACHED, THEY SHOULD HAVE THROWN HIS ASS IN JAIL!

why should Clinton be thrown in jail? Libby wasnt

[IEATV8S]

Originally Posted by Gothmog

why should Clinton be thrown in jail? Libby wasnt

Libby was commuted, perhaps BJ should have got a 1/4 million fine also, but then, he would have pleaded to THE PEOPLE to help him and his 109 million out!

[86NYGN]

The ACTUAL point of this thread was to show that Palin can't read a report and actually GRASP what the written words are and what their meaning is. It doesn't matter who wrote the report or whether or not it is true or even if it was written in crayon. The report stated she ABUSED her power and she said that it does NOT state she abused her power. If someone can read a very clearly writen report,be it true or false in crayon ink or pencil, which states that there was an ABUSE OF POWER ,and this person is running for VP of the USA and makes a statement repeatedly that the report CLEARED her of any abuse or wrongdoing then she is either reading challenged or just plain lying.

[Gothmog]

Originally Posted by 86NYGN

The ACTUAL point of this thread was to show that Palin can't read a report and actually GRASP what the written words are and what their meaning is. It doesn't matter who wrote the report or whether or not it is true or even if it was written in crayon. The report stated she ABUSED her power and she said that it does NOT state she abused her power. If someone can read a very clearly writen report,be it true or false in crayon ink or pencil, which states that there was an ABUSE OF POWER ,and this person is running for VP of the USA and makes a statement repeatedly that the report CLEARED her of any abuse or wrongdoing then she is either reading challenged or just plain lying.

She knows what it says, but she knows that if you lie, there is a bunch of people who will believe you anyway, and if you continue to lie, that number will go up.
Lies like-liberal media, republicans are fiscally conservative, republicans are small govt, republicans love their country more than democrats, republicans are the only ones who care about the troops...etc

keep lying, and the sheep will eventually repeat it

[salvageV6]

Yep, just like Obama and Bitem do.

Speaking of lying lefty sheep.

Like we aren't really associated with domestic terrorists, racists, socialists, communists, and the lying lefty toe the line Dumocrat party, we are for "change".

BWAHAHAHAHAA!!!!

[IEATV8S]

You talk about a complete IDIOT!!!!

Joe's BULL**** diarrhea potty mouth!

YouTube - Sen. Biden calls BULL**** on Bush smearing Obama from Israel

Joe's STAND UP CHUCK to a wheelchair bound man! Ya can tell I'm NEW at this!!!!

YouTube - Joe Biden Tells Chuck Graham to Stand Up

Ya can't go to a 7-11 UNLESS you have a slight Indian accent!!!

YouTube - Joe Biden's racist slip

My State was a SLAVE STATE!!!!!

YouTube - Sen. Biden Brags: "My State Was A Slave State"

Biden thinks Gun Owner should have his head examined!

YouTube - Biden thinks gun owner should have his head examined

The Presidency is not for ON THE JOB TRAINING!

YouTube - Joe Biden On Barack Obama

Obama, main stream African American whi is Clean, articulate, bright and nice looking!!

YouTube - Match Made in Heaven: Biden VP to a Clean Obama

BUT, I'm not running for Vice President!!!

YouTube - Joe Biden Tells His First Fib as Obama's VP (Vice President)

Being a DRUNK jerk and being taped!!!!

YouTube - The Drunk: Joe Biden drunk singing gaffe Obama vice president

Barack AMERICA!!!!!!

YouTube - Barack Obama , Joe Biden Gaffes Begin

Be PATRIOTIC, PAY higher taxes!!!!!

YouTube - Be Patriotic and Pay Higher Taxes

Joe and NObama got tested for AIDS!!!!!

YouTube - Joe Biden says Barack Obama got tested for Aids

Biden's "McCain computer ad" was "TERRIBLE"!!!!

YouTube - Biden: Obama ad attacking McCain "Terrible"

Biden elitism - Obama too smart & well educated for you to relate to

YouTube - Biden elitism - Obama too smart & well educated for you to relate to

Joe Biden on Renewables and Coal, Opposite NObama's stance!

YouTube - Joe Biden on Renewables and Coal in Maumee, OH

INSTILL CONFIDENCE? FDR when the market crashed got on TV!

YouTube - Biden: FDR Led When Market Crashed

I Got a much higher IQ then you do!

YouTube - 1988 Road to the White House with Sen. Biden

Hillary Clinton is qualified or MORE qualified then I am, she might have been the better pick!!!

YouTube - Unbelievable - Joe Biden says Hillary Clinton is better VP than he is.

Biden calls Palin a Lt. Governor?

YouTube - Biden Gaffe: Lt. Governor of Alaska?

Doesn't know the difference between Brigades Or Battalions!

YouTube - Biden Gaffe: Brigades Or Battalions

Joe Biden Exaggerates Helicopter Story!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQ7Kf7jJOM4

Biden Should Have Waited On AIG!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KbaG...eature=related

A THREE LETTER WORD..........J-O-B-S!!!!!!!

YouTube - Joe Biden Can't Count

[whitehot84]

Originally Posted by Gothmog

She knows what it says, but she knows that if you lie, there is a bunch of people who will believe you anyway, and if you continue to lie, that number will go up.
Lies like-liberal media, republicans are fiscally conservative, republicans are small govt, republicans love their country more than democrats, republicans are the only ones who care about the troops...etc

keep lying, and the sheep will eventually repeat it

Hey, if anyone on here knows about lies it's the good Spin Doctor.