why hasnt bush been impeached????

[national]

Now for all you that voted for the cowboy 8&4 years ago..bush is saying..how do you like now...haha ..he is the most pathedic president we ever had..i thought..oh well how bad can he be but damn...get a blowjob & you get threatened to be impeached..have 3 disasters in his 8 years & not be impeached?? Why isnt that being brought up?yes he can be blamed for it all..he is the main man,,,the head honcho..rightys you cant go blaming everyone else..if clinton or anyone was in there yall sure would be blaming them too..just a truthful answer is all I want..Why isnt he being impeached?

[IEATV8S]

Originally Posted by national

Now for all you that voted for the cowboy 8&4 years ago..bush is saying..how do you like now...haha ..he is the most pathedic president we ever had..i thought..oh well how bad can he be but damn...get a blowjob & you get threatened to be impeached..have 3 disasters in his 8 years & not be impeached?? Why isnt that being brought up?yes he can be blamed for it all..he is the main man,,,the head honcho..rightys you cant go blaming everyone else..if clinton or anyone was in there yall sure would be blaming them too..just a truthful answer is all I want..Why isnt he being impeached?

Lying before a Grand Jury is a Felony. Because the FAGGERALS don't like him, is an opinion!

[Mac in SD]

Originally Posted by national

Now for all you that voted for the cowboy 8&4 years ago..bush is saying..how do you like now...haha ..he is the most pathedic president we ever had..i thought..oh well how bad can he be but damn...get a blowjob & you get threatened to be impeached..have 3 disasters in his 8 years & not be impeached?? Why isnt that being brought up?yes he can be blamed for it all..he is the main man,,,the head honcho..rightys you cant go blaming everyone else..if clinton or anyone was in there yall sure would be blaming them too..just a truthful answer is all I want..Why isnt he being impeached?

Just guessing here. You breathe through your mouth, don't you.

[PCS74]

Originally Posted by national

Now for all you that voted for the cowboy 8&4 years ago..bush is saying..how do you like now...haha ..he is the most pathedic president we ever had..

....says the guy who couldn't pass third grade reading, writing or spelling exams.

[SouthernCal GN]

Originally Posted by national

Now for all you that voted for the cowboy 8&4 years ago..bush is saying..how do you like now...haha ..he is the most pathedic president we ever had..i thought..oh well how bad can he be but damn...get a blowjob & you get threatened to be impeached..have 3 disasters in his 8 years & not be impeached?? Why isnt that being brought up?yes he can be blamed for it all..he is the main man,,,the head honcho..rightys you cant go blaming everyone else..if clinton or anyone was in there yall sure would be blaming them too..just a truthful answer is all I want..Why isnt he being impeached?

Truthful answer; Ok.

because he hasn't committed an impeachable offense.

When you pull you head out of the sand, perhaps we can go over things point by point. For now, suffice it to say that your obviously skewed viewpoint is based on nothing more than talking points, without fact to support them.

Oh yes, while the prez may enjoy a fairly low 30% (+/-) approval rating, the congress, led by your boys the Dems, have a 10% approval rating.

Isn't that interesting...........

[SFITurbo]

Originally Posted by national

Now for all you that voted for the cowboy 8&4 years ago..bush is saying..how do you like now...haha ..he is the most pathedic president we ever had..i thought..oh well how bad can he be but damn...get a blowjob & you get threatened to be impeached..have 3 disasters in his 8 years & not be impeached?? Why isnt that being brought up?yes he can be blamed for it all..he is the main man,,,the head honcho..rightys you cant go blaming everyone else..if clinton or anyone was in there yall sure would be blaming them too..just a truthful answer is all I want..Why isnt he being impeached?

Truthfully....you don't impeach someone who's doing their job within the constraints of their responsibility and the approval of the oversight of elected officials in place, nor do you impeach for the opinion of a select number of disgruntled people. Because the leaches of society are having a rough time financially, the President gets the brunt of the blame, guess what...your duely elected Congress and Senate is to blame for causing your strife, break out a junior high government textbook and research before you puke out the nonsense you posted. I don't blame Clinton for everything in the 90's, but his policies he pushed sure messed up alot both then and now.

[Gothmog]

You saw what happened when the democrats tried a simple investigation into US attorneygate...Bush simply stonewalls and ignores subpoenas.

So good luck getting an investigation going when the admin wont comply with the law of the land


He should be impeached for:

lying us into war
Using banned weapons in war
Violations of Geneva convention- Torture
and
Treason- outing a covert CIA operative

[The Blob]

And also for not being able to pronounce 'nuclear'.

[V8Assassin]

I don't believe he should be impeached. It doesn't seem, that's right goth, that he as done anything that would be an impeachable offense. Seems as though the dems would have done it by now given their control of Congress if there was something absolute.

However, he is an idiot and possibly the poorest excuse to ever be in the White House. His support of this bailout has been disgusting.

The problem with this election is simple, nobama supporters want change so bad they'll look over anything to get it. Simply put two wrongs don't make a right, and two bad Presidents in a row won't make one good one. His supporters have been so blinded with his change message they forgot to ask one crucial question, what kind of change? There's alot that can and will be if he is elected that will be negative change, or actually more of the same. Take one look at his home district and ask yourself, is this what I want for the rest of the country? Worst schools, worst crime, corrupt politics/fianancier, highest taxes, and everyone blaming each other. He was wrong on Iraq, no matter how hard he tries to spin it, he was wrong on "affordable mtgs, he was wrong on taxes, and he is currently supporting the person's idea that you want to impeach. He has been in the pocket of fannie and freddie since he took office, and actually boast of his working with paulson on the bailout. This is the guy Bush put in, the guy you want to impeach, and your candidate has already sold himself out to him. If watching this situation unfold hasn't convinced you that they are all in bed together, and in the end have no interest other than to perpetuate a corrupt system which serves only them and their closest allies who helped them get there or in some way can serve their mutal interest, then you are either an idiot or have become so overtaken by party loyalty that your country is taking a back seat to your desire to simply win an election.

No, I am not real happy with McCain and his support of the bill either. Every politician in DC should have to cut a personal check back to fannie, freddie, aig, and any other organization who they received lobbiest money from and are now bailing out. The failed CEO's should be in the same place my neighbor's ex husband is............PRISON!!!!!

[whitehot84]

Originally Posted by The Blob

And also for not being able to pronounce 'nuclear'.

If that's the case, Barney Frank should be hanged.

[national]

and when was they majority dem?.. like how long ago were they voted in? hmm must have been the majority rep. your talking about before that..

Originally Posted by SFITurbo

Truthfully....you don't impeach someone who's doing their job within the constraints of their responsibility and the approval of the oversight of elected officials in place, nor do you impeach for the opinion of a select number of disgruntled people. Because the leaches of society are having a rough time financially, the President gets the brunt of the blame, guess what...your duely elected Congress and Senate is to blame for causing your strife, break out a junior high government textbook and research before you puke out the nonsense you posted. I don't blame Clinton for everything in the 90's, but his policies he pushed sure messed up alot both then and now.

[UNGN]

Originally Posted by national

and when was they majority dem?.. like how long ago were they voted in? hmm must have been the majority rep. your talking about before that..

Watch this video, national.

YouTube Video

Forget about the pro McLame stuff at the end, but it will help you understand where the fannie mae/Freddie mac debacle came from.

Congress was in denial about Fannie and Freddie and the same people that were DIRECTLY responsible for the financial meltdown are blaming Bush.

[V8Assassin]

Keep blaming bush and the republicans, it serves us well to see your intellectual dishonesty.

YouTube Video

[a trail rider]

Originally Posted by national

Now for all you that voted for the cowboy 8&4 years ago..bush is saying..how do you like now...haha ..he is the most pathedic president we ever had..i thought..oh well how bad can he be but damn...get a blowjob & you get threatened to be impeached..have 3 disasters in his 8 years & not be impeached?? Why isnt that being brought up?yes he can be blamed for it all..he is the main man,,,the head honcho..rightys you cant go blaming everyone else..if clinton or anyone was in there yall sure would be blaming them too..just a truthful answer is all I want..Why isnt he being impeached?

You THOUGHT? Fooled most of us with that one...

1st, Clinton WAS impeached. No threat. It happened.
Now then... 3 disasters? Lemme guess, you mean the 2 hurricanes and the flooding? Or do you mean the attacks on 9/11/01 instead of flooding? Anyway, no President can be held responsible for a disaster. Only a real idiot would think he can. THAT is why it isn't being brought up, silly. They call'em "natural disasters" for a reason...
Nobody blamed Clinton for any disaster and only a scatter-brain would say it would happen... There WERE disasters, I'm sure. He wasn't blamed for any of them, ever. What a moronic thought process...

He isn't being impeached because he hasn't committed a single crime that Democrats in power can think of to date. So either he hasn't committed any, or the Democrats are not only inept, but stupid.

Originally Posted by national

and when was they majority dem?.. like how long ago were they voted in? hmm must have been the majority rep. your talking about before that..

The Dems were voted in nearly 2yrs ago. If they had ANYTHING they remotely thought was usable, they'd have used it by now. Indeed, they warned him they would impeach if we went to war with Iran... Of course, the Constitution protects him from such nonsense, but Democrats don't seem to have any understanding of that truth in the 1st place. Here's your "clue" before you spout off... It is the sole RIGHT of the President, as commander in chief, to send troops into battle. He, or she, need not ask for Congressional approval and they cannot, by law, prevent such orders or action on his part.

Originally Posted by Gothmog

You saw what happened when the democrats tried a simple investigation into US attorneygate...Bush simply stonewalls and ignores subpoenas.

So good luck getting an investigation going when the admin wont comply with the law of the land


He should be impeached for:

lying us into war
Using banned weapons in war
Violations of Geneva convention- Torture
and
Treason- outing a covert CIA operative

Goth, how stupid do you hope the citizens of America are? You just said, "the admin wont comply with the law of the land" as if that's true. Only one minor problem... You lied(again) because if they did as you say, the President and more would be removed from power. As for "lying us into war"... Not only did that never happen, but even if it did, that's not impeachable because it is the Presidents right, even though the mindless/thoughtless wonders of America don't understand that simple truth.

Banned weapons in war... Don't even bother trying to prove that idiocy. You and the rest of us know that you're totally incapable.

Violations of Geneva Convention... Torture. LAUGHABLE! Utterly laughable.

Treason, for "outing" a CIA agent... Flat out lie, but we've come to expect nothing more from you. It simply didn't happen... ever. No doubt, you're referring to Valerie Plame, but the world already knows who "outed" her and as you know, it wasn't President Bush.

All I have trouble understanding is WHY you just make up this garbage as you go? Do you even attempt to read the lies you make up? Are you really convinced that somehow, some way, the rest of the country will just grow stupid one day and think you're being honest? Of course not. You don't even believe you, but you are blinded by hatred of that which you have proven, you cannot comprehend. You're a disgrace to all educated Americans living today. It's sad how pathetic you can be.

[national]

you got proof of clinton being impeached? I have never seen it but im sure you have..\en go to washing to fix this mess..im sure you have a solution..your prob for the 700billion too arent ya..

im not the moron as that would even think that someone else would think a president or anyone for that matter could stop a natural disaster..your the freaking moron...he sure didnt help any at all did he..well maybe he did 2 months after or at least gave a speech of it..im sure you have that video also..
im sure glad you know it all from now on i can just ask you..why the hell arent you running for senate or something..
yeah the 911 thing..way to go..go to iraq to find billaden..im sure hes there somewhere also..wheres your proof of weapons of mass destruction? im sure glad this economy is so good under an eight year tern of bush & the dems only being in last 2 years of it..i guess it was all created in the clinton time huh.. again..i love you hard rightys..you all are so freaky funny..yall know it freaking all..hahaha
1st, Clinton WAS impeached. No threat. It happened.
Now then... 3 disasters? Lemme guess, you mean the 2 hurricanes and the flooding? Or do you mean the attacks on 9/11/01 instead of flooding? Anyway, no President can be held responsible for a disaster. Only a real idiot would think he can. THAT is why it isn't being brought up, silly. They call'em "natural disasters" for a reason...
Nobody blamed Clinton for any disaster and only a scatter-brain would say it would happen... There WERE disasters, I'm sure. He wasn't blamed for any of them, ever. What a moronic thought process...

He isn't being impeached because he hasn't committed a single crime that Democrats in power can think of to date. So either he hasn't committed any, or the Democrats are not only inept, but stupid.
The Dems were voted in nearly 2yrs ago. If they had ANYTHING they remotely thought was usable, they'd have used it by now. Indeed, they warned him they would impeach if we went to war with Iran... Of course, the Constitution protects him from such nonsense, but Democrats don't seem to have any understanding of that truth in the 1st place. Here's your "clue" before you spout off... It is the sole RIGHT of the President, as commander in chief, to send troops into battle. He, or she, need not ask for Congressional approval and they cannot, by law, prevent such orders or action on his part.
Goth, how stupid do you hope the citizens of America are? You just said, "the admin wont comply with the law of the land" as if that's true. Only one minor problem... You lied(again) because if they did as you say, the President and more would be removed from power. As for "lying us into war"... Not only did that never happen, but even if it did, that's not impeachable because it is the Presidents right, even though the mindless/thoughtless wonders of America don't understand that simple truth.

Banned weapons in war... Don't even bother trying to prove that idiocy. You and the rest of us know that you're totally incapable.

Violations of Geneva Convention... Torture. LAUGHABLE! Utterly laughable.

Treason, for "outing" a CIA agent... Flat out lie, but we've come to expect nothing more from you. It simply didn't happen... ever. No doubt, you're referring to Valerie Plame, but the world already knows who "outed" her and as you know, it wasn't President Bush.

All I have trouble understanding is WHY you just make up this garbage as you go? Do you even attempt to read the lies you make up? Are you really convinced that somehow, some way, the rest of the country will just grow stupid one day and think you're being honest? Of course not. You don't even believe you, but you are blinded by hatred of that which you have proven, you cannot comprehend. You're a disgrace to all educated Americans living today. It's sad how pathetic you can be.[/quote]

[national]

funny i didnt see this video before now..you should have been on here with it a long time ago..i know..maybe someone on here has a link to a couple years ago where it was posted...
hers you a link to a video as i dont know how to post videos like yall..maybe you rep that know it all can help me out & teach me..

YouTube - BUSH WMD FUNNY=DEAD AMERICANS FUNNY=WHAT YOU WON'T SEE ON TV

Originally Posted by UNGN

Watch this video, national.



Forget about the pro McLame stuff at the end, but it will help you understand where the fannie mae/Freddie mac debacle came from.

Congress was in denial about Fannie and Freddie and the same people that were DIRECTLY responsible for the financial meltdown are blaming Bush.