Why Americans are Skeptical of Their Role in Global Warming

[Weester]

Why Americans are Skeptical of Their Role in Global Warming

By Sara Goudarzi, LiveScience Staff Writer
19 February 2007 11:29 am ET

While the evidence is clear that human-caused global warming is occurring and is a threat to many humans and other organisms on the planet, many Americans have been slow to buy the whole argument.

Yesterday at its annual meeting here, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the largest science organization in the world, issued a consensus statement that "global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now and is a growing threat to society,'' Earlier this month the Intergovernmental Panel in Climate Change issued a statement that global warming will "continue for centuries" and is "very likely caused by man."

While these statement may have changed public opinion in recent weeks, last year a joint poll between ABC News, Time, Stanford University and Ohio State University found that only 3 in 10 Americans believed that global warming is caused by humans. Less than 40 percent of the nation’s public called global warming is an immediate and serious problem.

"Americans are very much on the same wavelength with the scientific community about the basics of the issue," Jon Krosnick, professor of communication and of political science from Stanford University said during a talk here yesterday. "But they lack certainty" about how bad the problem really is.

Amid the public uncertainty, data continues to pile up. The average global temperature last month was the highest for any January on record. Last year was a record warm year in the United States. The past nine years are all among the 25 warmest on record for the contiguous United States, a streak unprecedented in records dating back to 1896. Scientists say 2007 could be the warmest yet globally.

But there is a disconnect between what scientists know and what the public believes. In order for Americans to embrace an issue like climate change as a nationally serious concern, they first have to believe that the problem exists and that the results would be bad for people, Krosnick said.

“Most Americans believe that,” Krosnick said. However, they also have to be highly certain about the problem. “Only 7 percent are extremely sure of their views about climate change, another 25 percent are very sure and 41 percent only somewhat sure,” Krosnick said. “So there’s lots of room for potential increase in certainty.”

Krosnick's research finds scientists are frustrated. "They've been sounding alarm bells for over a decade, saying, ‘We have a really serious problem with the environment and we're destined for a train wreck down the road. How come nobody is listening?'"

Many scientists assume that the public doesn't understand or accept their work.

"That is wrong," Krosnick said. Most Americans believe the world has been heating up, probably as a result of human activity, and that this will be bad for people, he said. But because people lack absolute certainty, global warming does not arouse a constantly heightened level of public concern.

Additionally, Americans believe that unless they caused the problem, they should not interfere with what’s happening with the climate.

“So in other words, if Mother Nature is doing her thing, then we cope with it and don’t try to manipulate it,” Krosnick said “But if we damage nature then it’s our responsibility to undo it and it is, in fact, a national problem.”

Only 42 percent of Americans blamed climate change on people in last year's poll, Krosnick said.

And lastly, people aren’t willing to acknowledge something is a problem unless it can be fixed, because otherwise it’s just too upsetting.

Media's role

The role of scientists and media is not to be forgotten in affecting public opinion, Krosnick said. Good scientists always leave room for potential mistakes and doubt when reporting their work, but communicating their natural uncertainty can cause reservation in the public mind.

“When we ask people, 'Do you think scientific experts that study the climate mostly agree that the climate is heating up or do you think that there is a lot of disagreement,' 64 percent of Americans said that there is disagreement in the scientific community,” Krosnick said.

This false belief, Krosnick explained, seems to be tied to the efforts of the news media to tell a balanced story.

“Many of the stories have not only the mainstream scientific opinion on climate change but they also have some attention to the skeptics—four people, I guess, that make a good living doing this—and the skeptical point of view has more prominence in the media than it does in the scientific literature,” Krosnick said. “And that’s what’s contributing very importantly to this belief.”

[IEATV8S]

Global warming may 'stop', scientists predict - Telegraph

American Thinker Blog: Global Warming may 'Stop': Scientists

Ocean currents may offset global warming over coming decade | Science | guardian.co.uk

Apathy About Global Warming May Be Result Of Increased Knowledge

Browse by tag: global warming may 2008

The Mystery of Global Warming's Missing Heat : NPR

Global warming impact may be overstated - Telegraph

Global Warming and the Minefield of Unintended Consequences - Freakonomics - Opinion - New York Times Blog

Sun's Shifts May Cause Global Warming | Global Warming | DISCOVER Magazine

Blue Crab Boulevard » “Global Warming” Jumps The Shark, Literally

Ad infinitum!

[Weester]

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....yawn

[Turbo RX-6]

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....yawn

First post, or second?

[bsdlinux]

Originally Posted by Weester

Why Americans are Skeptical of Their Role in Global Warming

Well seeing pictures of Bejing where you can't actually see the city and all the while being told that the US must sign the Kyoto treaty but China doesn't have to abide or have the same standards certainly doesn;t help

[salvageV6]

Ouch lying lefty smackdown by the truth.

" Well seeing pictures of Bejing where you can't actually see the city and all the while being told that the US must sign the Kyoto treaty but China doesn't have to abide or have the same standards certainly doesn;t help! "

I am not part of the "problem" so I don't intend to be part of the "solution", I'm not skeptical of my role at all!

I do know for a fact that I'm "greener" than Al Gore.

And smarter than Weakster.

Certainly this is a seriously flawed premise!!!

" While the evidence is clear that human-caused global warming is occurring and is a threat to many humans and other organisms on the planet, many Americans have been slow to buy the whole argument. "

I don't buy the first part of the argument so why buy the rest of it.

More of Weaksters LIES.