A Chance for JSAut to debate in a logical, principled manor without insulting verbage

[Blown&Injected]

Originally Posted by JSAautomotive

Snopes did not agree with the picture that Red tried painting by posting this trash. Reds post makes it seem like Bush won by a landslide. In actuality it was the other way around. As far as Americans that voted, 500,000 more Americans voted for Gore than they did for Bush. It's at the official site for U.S. elections if you care to check it out.

So when you Republiloons say Bush won the election.... he did. Technically. But he's not the man Americans wanted to be in the White house.

You have again been WHOOOSHED.

Just like all your other posts you are attempting to change the topic and then argue the point from your changed topic. What is sad, by the way you finish your post, you seem to enjoy the status of the board strawman.

It is not about how many voted for which person, it is more about the type of person that has the support of each party.

Also, it is transparent to just about any other poster that you would not use insults in the form of child-like made-up words like "Republiloons" if you really had any ground to stand on. It just makes you look like the {edited to keep within the rules that got the other thread closed}

Originally Posted by JSAautomotive

As far as the other information is concerned.... it was grossly overstated. A typical republican trick to make it seem once again that the whole country is lock footstep with your idealologies.... but when the data is closely analyzed, it shows nothing different than the trends/data that is available from U.S. sources. So.... while it may not technically be a lie, the gross over-exajuration of the numbers certainly is.

It's dis-honest and you and your buddies should fact check yourselves more.

Kinda like when you said Don Dumbsfeld didn't sell arms to Iraq.

The other information is not "grossly overstated" as you claim. Your own liberal slanted site says agrees with the election figures even conceding that the final result jives. They offer some evidence that the crime stats are not as far apart as the article states but then goes on to show that those figures maybe calculated in different ways. Also, snopes does not account for the different time periods or over time period that may produce the numbers claimed in the article. Either way, even your source agrees that the rate is, or was, higher in the liberal areas.

Originally Posted by JSAautomotive

You were dead wrong and didn't know what you're talking about.

Strawman = 10
Scarecrow = 0

You lose.

It seems that you again have been proven wrong without even needing more than your own source. It matters not how many times you claim to win or to have "slapped" any board member, the end result is the same - you lose again - LOL

[Red Regal T]

An agreement would have to be met. However, to expect a leftist to honor his word, and not continue the exact bad behavior, is totally naive. You could make the same offer a million times, and get the same result. You can't make deals with people who don't work in good faith. Just as you see the democrats voting in lockstep in the congress, they only forward the leftist mindset as demanded by the leftist fringe who finance the democrat party. They only vote with the Republicans if they know they are going to lose to give the perception, to the people, that they are reasonable. Always calculating, always political, and always jockying for advantage even if it hurts America.

They voted for it, before they voted against it ... KOOKS!

[The Blob]

Somehow I think we have seen the last of JSA.

[Red Regal T]

Originally Posted by The Blob

Somehow I think we have seen the last of JSA.

..................

You have a penchant for trolls, don't you?

[Vector]

I have to say, that I enjoy reasonable, well thought out debate.
Personal attacks taint discussion and typically de-rail an otherwise interesting thread. I don't like to use the terms left-wing, right-wing, liberal, or conservative as most do not like to be labeled; when labeled people get defensive and name calling starts - good-bye thread.

[Vector]

Gee, that sounds so politically correct, that I want to slap myself.
Take it for the meaning, not the wording.

[Red Regal T]

I don't believe a CONSERVATIVE exists, that isn't proud to be referred to as a CONSERVATIVE. Now, I understand that liberals don't like to be labelled or admit what they are for. If you'd like, I could list for you what they're for. That's why they call themselves something different all the time. They are just plain, DECEPTIVE. They have to be, to fool as many people as they have. THAT'S A FACT!

[weester87]

"A Chance for JSAut to debate in a logical, principled manor without insulting verbage"

Pssst, its manner not manor. You might want to take an English class before you start the debate

manor

NOUN:
A landed estate.
The main house on an estate; a mansion.
A tract of land in certain North American colonies with hereditary rights granted to the proprietor by royal charter.


You cant have a debate with Comrade Red, if you disagree with him you are a leftist/liberal/traitor. He uses the same tactics that were used in Nazi Germany and Italy by their FASCIST governments.

[Red Regal T]

Originally Posted by weester87

"A Chance for JSAut to debate in a logical, principled manor without insulting verbage"

Pssst, its manner not manor. You might want to take an English class before you start the debate

manor

NOUN:
A landed estate.
The main house on an estate; a mansion.
A tract of land in certain North American colonies with hereditary rights granted to the proprietor by royal charter.


You cant have a debate with Comrade Red, if you disagree with him you are a leftist/liberal/traitor. He uses the same tactics that were used in Nazi Germany and Italy by their FASCIST governments.

Correcting word usage now? Running out of LIES?

[weester87]

"Correcting word usage now? Running out of LIES?"

LMAO! No lies here, Comrade Red! Its time for your daily reality check!

[Blown&Injected]

It was past 2 in the morning and you are just being argumentative for the purpose of being insulting. The proof is that you admit that you perfectly understand what I had written in the first place. You are proving RRT's point in this thread.

Albert Einstein wan many other extremely intelligent types were/are bad spellers.

So i say please direct all your comments about my spelling and grammar to the brick wall to your left.

NEXT!!!

[Blown&Injected]

Whoops, forgot to cap "i" in my last post, I wonder if that means it now makes absolutely no sense to those that read it

Just forget this entire thread.
I noticed JS Auto posting in another section and clicked on his screen name, and then find all posts. It looks like his behavior has caught up with him. Until just the other day, all his posts, going back 10 pages, are all in the Political section. It seems he has not seen fit to add anything to the Turbo Buick community in a long time, but for some reason he is now posting in the Tech section after no posts anywhere but here so it looks like there will be no debate with him for seemingly good reason.

[weester87]

"Albert Einstein wan many other extremely intelligent types were/are bad spellers"

Are you comparing yourself to AE?

Its impossible to have a debate on this board, too many extremists..

I know, Red...Its a liberal conspiracy!